Stochastic investigation of the relationship between track geometry and ballast degradation rates

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Geotechnics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101533
Jose Augusto V.S. Ramos, Arthur de O. Lima, Marcus S. Dersch, J. Riley Edwards
{"title":"Stochastic investigation of the relationship between track geometry and ballast degradation rates","authors":"Jose Augusto V.S. Ramos,&nbsp;Arthur de O. Lima,&nbsp;Marcus S. Dersch,&nbsp;J. Riley Edwards","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The railroad track system and its components are a critical transportation asset that is responsible for transmitting rolling stock wheel loads to the roadbed. To ensure safe and efficient operations, railroads perform frequent track inspections, some of which generate substantial amounts of track health data. Furthermore, with the rise of data science tools and methods, the potential for these data to move maintenance and safety towards more robust analysis is fostered. Recently, railroads around the world have increased their use of data trending for geometry prediction but they do not always cover how the boundary conditions are also changing over time. This study presents an evaluation of the relationship between the change of track geometry condition and ballast profile on both curved and tangent track segments. The stochastic approach proved to be a valid comparative method for the existing and emerging datasets. Track geometry profile degradation was shown to have significant correlation with both the Ballast Health Index (BHI) and initial value of profile. Additionally, profile degradation was found to be more accelerated in regions with poorer initial geometry profiles and higher initial BHI values. Findings have the potential to improve maintenance effectiveness and prioritization and provide a method for quantifying track degradation rates under different operating and maintenance conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 101533"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391225000522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The railroad track system and its components are a critical transportation asset that is responsible for transmitting rolling stock wheel loads to the roadbed. To ensure safe and efficient operations, railroads perform frequent track inspections, some of which generate substantial amounts of track health data. Furthermore, with the rise of data science tools and methods, the potential for these data to move maintenance and safety towards more robust analysis is fostered. Recently, railroads around the world have increased their use of data trending for geometry prediction but they do not always cover how the boundary conditions are also changing over time. This study presents an evaluation of the relationship between the change of track geometry condition and ballast profile on both curved and tangent track segments. The stochastic approach proved to be a valid comparative method for the existing and emerging datasets. Track geometry profile degradation was shown to have significant correlation with both the Ballast Health Index (BHI) and initial value of profile. Additionally, profile degradation was found to be more accelerated in regions with poorer initial geometry profiles and higher initial BHI values. Findings have the potential to improve maintenance effectiveness and prioritization and provide a method for quantifying track degradation rates under different operating and maintenance conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Geotechnics
Transportation Geotechnics Social Sciences-Transportation
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
11.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.
期刊最新文献
Stochastic investigation of the relationship between track geometry and ballast degradation rates Integral railway bridges with different transition zone designs Utilising construction and demolition waste in soft soil stabilisation: A prediction model for enhanced strength and stiffness Research on the determination of subgrade gravimetric moisture content under different compactness based on the ground penetrating radar Evaluating dispersivenss of high cations content clay soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1