Greenness index profile in maize canopy: Implications for crop N status diagnosis

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Field Crops Research Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109824
Nicolas E. Maltese , Walter D. Carciochi , Octavio P. Caviglia , María P. Iglesias , Nahuel I. Reussi Calvo
{"title":"Greenness index profile in maize canopy: Implications for crop N status diagnosis","authors":"Nicolas E. Maltese ,&nbsp;Walter D. Carciochi ,&nbsp;Octavio P. Caviglia ,&nbsp;María P. Iglesias ,&nbsp;Nahuel I. Reussi Calvo","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The greenness index of the ear-leaf in maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) has been used to assess crop nitrogen (N) status, but it may not accurately predict yield responses to late N fertilization.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to i) analyze differences in the greenness index and N sufficiency index (NSI) across maize canopy leaf positions and their relationship with soil N availability, N nutrition index (NNI), and grain yield, and ii) evaluate the accuracy of NSI determined in different leaf positions in predicting the grain yield response to N fertilization at silking.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The greenness index was measured across the maize canopy profile under varying N rates and application timings in five field experiments. Bell-shaped models described the greenness index distribution, and relationships among NSI, NNI, and relative grain yield (rGY) were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At silking, NSI differences were more pronounced in lower leaves, showing stronger associations with soil N availability (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.69) and NNI (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.58), compared to the ear-leaf (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.37 and 0.54, respectively). The NSI vs rGY relationship showed no differences among the three lower leaf positions. Measurements in upper leaves had weak associations with crop N status or yield responses. Only NSI from leaves in the lowest position below the ear-leaf predicted yield response to N fertilization at silking.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Measuring NSI in lower leaves provided a better assessment of crop N status, improving predictions of yield responses to late N applications, and supporting more precise N fertilization strategies for modern maize hybrids.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"325 ","pages":"Article 109824"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025000899","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

The greenness index of the ear-leaf in maize (Zea mays L.) has been used to assess crop nitrogen (N) status, but it may not accurately predict yield responses to late N fertilization.

Objective

This study aimed to i) analyze differences in the greenness index and N sufficiency index (NSI) across maize canopy leaf positions and their relationship with soil N availability, N nutrition index (NNI), and grain yield, and ii) evaluate the accuracy of NSI determined in different leaf positions in predicting the grain yield response to N fertilization at silking.

Methods

The greenness index was measured across the maize canopy profile under varying N rates and application timings in five field experiments. Bell-shaped models described the greenness index distribution, and relationships among NSI, NNI, and relative grain yield (rGY) were analyzed.

Results

At silking, NSI differences were more pronounced in lower leaves, showing stronger associations with soil N availability (R2 > 0.69) and NNI (R2 > 0.58), compared to the ear-leaf (R2 = 0.37 and 0.54, respectively). The NSI vs rGY relationship showed no differences among the three lower leaf positions. Measurements in upper leaves had weak associations with crop N status or yield responses. Only NSI from leaves in the lowest position below the ear-leaf predicted yield response to N fertilization at silking.

Conclusions

Measuring NSI in lower leaves provided a better assessment of crop N status, improving predictions of yield responses to late N applications, and supporting more precise N fertilization strategies for modern maize hybrids.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
期刊最新文献
Managing trade-offs among yield, carbon, and nitrogen footprints of wheat-maize cropping system under straw mulching and N fertilizer application in China's Loess Plateau Development of a model for maize stalk lodging resistance based on plant bending strength and trait selection Synergies and trade-offs of crop diversification system for productive, energy budget, economic, and environmental indicators in Northeast China Improving soil health and crop productivity through conservation agriculture and nitrogen management in rice-mustard-maize systems Greenness index profile in maize canopy: Implications for crop N status diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1