Improving soil health and crop productivity through conservation agriculture and nitrogen management in rice-mustard-maize systems

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Field Crops Research Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109825
Santosh Marahatta , Shrawan Kumar Sah , Andrew McDonald , Jagadish Timsina , Krishna Prasad Devkota
{"title":"Improving soil health and crop productivity through conservation agriculture and nitrogen management in rice-mustard-maize systems","authors":"Santosh Marahatta ,&nbsp;Shrawan Kumar Sah ,&nbsp;Andrew McDonald ,&nbsp;Jagadish Timsina ,&nbsp;Krishna Prasad Devkota","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Conventional crop production practices, including crop establishment using intensive soil tillage, low use of fertilization, low-yielding varieties, and the removal or burning of crop residues, in the Terai region of Nepal have led to low crop yields and nutrient imbalances. Conservation agriculture (CA) offers a potential solution by integrating no-tillage, residue retention, and optimized nitrogen (N) management, yet its impact in this region remains underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study investigated the effects of CA practices combined with varying N rates on soil physico-chemical properties, nutrient uptake, and crop yields in rice-mustard-maize- systems.</div></div><div><h3>Methodologies</h3><div>A two-year field experiment (2011–2013) was conducted in farmers’ fields in the Western Terai region using a strip-split plot design. Treatments included: (i) two establishment methods (CA: no-till with residue retention vs. conventional tillage (CT): conventional tillage without residue retention, (ii) two crop varieties (improved or hybrid vs. local), and (iii) four N rates (0, 60, 120, and 180 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for rice and 0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for mustard in both years whereas for maize, 0, 60, 120, and 180 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the first year and 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the second year). Soil properties, crop yields, and crop nutrient uptake were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results and discussion</h3><div>CA enhanced soil fertility and structure, with significant increase in soil organic carbon (15.4 %) and total nitrogen (14.6 %) at 0–10 cm depth, reduced bulk density, and improved moisture retention. In CA, Nitrogen uptake increased by 3 % in rice and 11 % in maize, while yield increased by 7 % and 9 %, respectively. Hybrid maize and rice outperformed local varieties, yielding 47 % and 3 % higher, respectively. Mustard performed variably, with ‘Bikash’ yielding 44 % more than ‘Goldie’. System productivity increased by 5 % under CA. Optimal yields were achieved with 180 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for rice and maize and 90 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for mustard. Increased N application reduced barrenness and sterility percentage across varieties.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CA combined with optimized N management significantly improves soil health, nutrient dynamics, and crop productivity in intensive rice-based systems. Hybrid varieties exhibit higher productivity under CA than open-pollinated or inbred types. Thus, adopting CA with appropriate N management and variety can sustainably intensify cropping systems, bridging yield gaps while preserving soil health. These findings have implications for broader adoption across Nepal's Terai and similar agroecological zones of Indo-Gangetic Plains, addressing food security and environmental challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"325 ","pages":"Article 109825"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025000905","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Conventional crop production practices, including crop establishment using intensive soil tillage, low use of fertilization, low-yielding varieties, and the removal or burning of crop residues, in the Terai region of Nepal have led to low crop yields and nutrient imbalances. Conservation agriculture (CA) offers a potential solution by integrating no-tillage, residue retention, and optimized nitrogen (N) management, yet its impact in this region remains underexplored.

Objectives

This study investigated the effects of CA practices combined with varying N rates on soil physico-chemical properties, nutrient uptake, and crop yields in rice-mustard-maize- systems.

Methodologies

A two-year field experiment (2011–2013) was conducted in farmers’ fields in the Western Terai region using a strip-split plot design. Treatments included: (i) two establishment methods (CA: no-till with residue retention vs. conventional tillage (CT): conventional tillage without residue retention, (ii) two crop varieties (improved or hybrid vs. local), and (iii) four N rates (0, 60, 120, and 180 kg ha−1 for rice and 0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha−1 for mustard in both years whereas for maize, 0, 60, 120, and 180 kg ha−1 in the first year and 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha−1 in the second year). Soil properties, crop yields, and crop nutrient uptake were assessed.

Results and discussion

CA enhanced soil fertility and structure, with significant increase in soil organic carbon (15.4 %) and total nitrogen (14.6 %) at 0–10 cm depth, reduced bulk density, and improved moisture retention. In CA, Nitrogen uptake increased by 3 % in rice and 11 % in maize, while yield increased by 7 % and 9 %, respectively. Hybrid maize and rice outperformed local varieties, yielding 47 % and 3 % higher, respectively. Mustard performed variably, with ‘Bikash’ yielding 44 % more than ‘Goldie’. System productivity increased by 5 % under CA. Optimal yields were achieved with 180 kg ha−1 for rice and maize and 90 kg ha−1 for mustard. Increased N application reduced barrenness and sterility percentage across varieties.

Conclusions

CA combined with optimized N management significantly improves soil health, nutrient dynamics, and crop productivity in intensive rice-based systems. Hybrid varieties exhibit higher productivity under CA than open-pollinated or inbred types. Thus, adopting CA with appropriate N management and variety can sustainably intensify cropping systems, bridging yield gaps while preserving soil health. These findings have implications for broader adoption across Nepal's Terai and similar agroecological zones of Indo-Gangetic Plains, addressing food security and environmental challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
期刊最新文献
Managing trade-offs among yield, carbon, and nitrogen footprints of wheat-maize cropping system under straw mulching and N fertilizer application in China's Loess Plateau Development of a model for maize stalk lodging resistance based on plant bending strength and trait selection Synergies and trade-offs of crop diversification system for productive, energy budget, economic, and environmental indicators in Northeast China Improving soil health and crop productivity through conservation agriculture and nitrogen management in rice-mustard-maize systems Greenness index profile in maize canopy: Implications for crop N status diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1