Medical Student Role in the Cardiothoracic Operating Room: A Needs Assessment to Optimize Engagement

Kayla N. Laraia MD , Nathaniel Deboever MD , Dylan Nieman MD, PhD , Mara B. Antonoff MD
{"title":"Medical Student Role in the Cardiothoracic Operating Room: A Needs Assessment to Optimize Engagement","authors":"Kayla N. Laraia MD ,&nbsp;Nathaniel Deboever MD ,&nbsp;Dylan Nieman MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mara B. Antonoff MD","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Focused preparation for the cardiothoracic operating room (CTOR) may optimize intraoperative engagement and medical student interest, but such resources are lacking. We sought to characterize student educational needs in the CTOR to guide resource development.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A web-based survey targeting cardiothoracic surgeons, trainees, and operating room staff was distributed to identify areas for student improvement in the CTOR. Concepts investigated explored common student mistakes and expectations for knowledge and participation in the CTOR. Descriptive analyses were performed on multiple-choice polls and open-ended responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Polls received a mean of 317 responses (range, 222-504) and 20 open-ended comments. The most frequently cited student mistake was failure to understand their role in the CTOR (164 [32.5%]), followed by inappropriate chatting (141 [28.0%]) and breaking sterility (132 [26.2%]). Poll respondents valued students’ understanding of how to be helpful in the CTOR (101 [45.5%]) in addition to knowing what can or cannot be touched (47 [21.2%]) and basics of cardiopulmonary bypass (43 [19.4%]). Respondents indicated that students should assume active roles (84 [36.7%]), ask questions (66 [29%]), and help with minor tasks (41 [17.9%]). Respondents reported that students benefited most when they understood patient-specific clinicopathologic factors and basic operative steps.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We identified several areas for student improvement in the CTOR. Development of educational resources addressing these issues may enhance interest and augment recruitment of students to cardiothoracic surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 276-280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124003784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Focused preparation for the cardiothoracic operating room (CTOR) may optimize intraoperative engagement and medical student interest, but such resources are lacking. We sought to characterize student educational needs in the CTOR to guide resource development.

Methods

A web-based survey targeting cardiothoracic surgeons, trainees, and operating room staff was distributed to identify areas for student improvement in the CTOR. Concepts investigated explored common student mistakes and expectations for knowledge and participation in the CTOR. Descriptive analyses were performed on multiple-choice polls and open-ended responses.

Results

Polls received a mean of 317 responses (range, 222-504) and 20 open-ended comments. The most frequently cited student mistake was failure to understand their role in the CTOR (164 [32.5%]), followed by inappropriate chatting (141 [28.0%]) and breaking sterility (132 [26.2%]). Poll respondents valued students’ understanding of how to be helpful in the CTOR (101 [45.5%]) in addition to knowing what can or cannot be touched (47 [21.2%]) and basics of cardiopulmonary bypass (43 [19.4%]). Respondents indicated that students should assume active roles (84 [36.7%]), ask questions (66 [29%]), and help with minor tasks (41 [17.9%]). Respondents reported that students benefited most when they understood patient-specific clinicopathologic factors and basic operative steps.

Conclusions

We identified several areas for student improvement in the CTOR. Development of educational resources addressing these issues may enhance interest and augment recruitment of students to cardiothoracic surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生在心胸手术室的角色:优化参与的需求评估
背景:心胸手术室(CTOR)的重点准备可以优化术中参与度和医学生的兴趣,但缺乏这样的资源。我们试图在CTOR中描述学生的教育需求,以指导资源开发。方法针对心胸外科医生、实习生和手术室工作人员进行网络调查,以确定学生在CTOR方面需要改进的地方。调查的概念探讨了学生常见的错误以及对知识和参与CTOR的期望。对多项选择调查和开放式回答进行描述性分析。结果问卷调查平均收到317份回复(范围222-504)和20份开放式评论。学生最常犯的错误是不理解自己在CTOR中的角色(164例[32.5%]),其次是不恰当的聊天(141例[28.0%])和不孕(132例[26.2%])。调查对象重视学生对如何在CTOR中提供帮助的理解(101[45.5%]),以及了解什么可以触摸什么不可以触摸(47[21.2%])和体外循环的基础知识(43[19.4%])。受访者表示,学生应该扮演积极的角色(84人[36.7%]),提出问题(66人[29%]),并帮助完成次要任务(41人[17.9%])。受访者报告说,当学生了解患者特定的临床病理因素和基本的手术步骤时,他们受益最多。结论:我们确定了学生在CTOR方面需要改进的几个方面。解决这些问题的教育资源的开发可以提高学生对心胸外科的兴趣和增加招生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
期刊最新文献
Contents Trends in Surgery for Endocarditis: 15-Year Experience From a Statewide Quality Collaborative Concomitant Tricuspid Annuloplasty During Mitral Surgery: Becoming an Unpopular Practice? Evolution of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair: 30-Year Experience From a High-Volume Center National Midterm Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1