Do achievers tend to share goodness with the world? The effect of subjective social status on prosocial risky behavior.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02485-7
Changlin Liu, Yanan Hong, Huihan Yang, Youlong Zhan, Ping Hu
{"title":"Do achievers tend to share goodness with the world? The effect of subjective social status on prosocial risky behavior.","authors":"Changlin Liu, Yanan Hong, Huihan Yang, Youlong Zhan, Ping Hu","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02485-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The crisis of inequality in human society has profound implications, particularly in the context of risky helping dilemmas. This study examined the relationship between subjective social status and prosocial risky behavior (PRB) and its mediating mechanisms at both the trait and situational levels. Study 1 examined the relationship between trait subjective social status, holistic thinking, and PRB intention using a questionnaire. Study 2 further examined the causal relationships between situational subjective social status and PRB, their boundary conditions, and mediating mechanisms using experimental methods. The results showed that low-status individuals (vs. high-status individuals) tended to engage in more PRB for both trait and situational subjective social status. This difference existed only in the high-risk level condition. Furthermore, holistic thinking mediated the relationship between subjective social status and PRB. This has important implications for mitigating the negative impacts of social status disparities on individual psychology and behavior, promoting the enhancement of prosocial levels among individuals of different social statuses in risky situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02485-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The crisis of inequality in human society has profound implications, particularly in the context of risky helping dilemmas. This study examined the relationship between subjective social status and prosocial risky behavior (PRB) and its mediating mechanisms at both the trait and situational levels. Study 1 examined the relationship between trait subjective social status, holistic thinking, and PRB intention using a questionnaire. Study 2 further examined the causal relationships between situational subjective social status and PRB, their boundary conditions, and mediating mechanisms using experimental methods. The results showed that low-status individuals (vs. high-status individuals) tended to engage in more PRB for both trait and situational subjective social status. This difference existed only in the high-risk level condition. Furthermore, holistic thinking mediated the relationship between subjective social status and PRB. This has important implications for mitigating the negative impacts of social status disparities on individual psychology and behavior, promoting the enhancement of prosocial levels among individuals of different social statuses in risky situations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成功人士是否倾向于与世界分享美好?主观社会地位对亲社会风险行为的影响。
人类社会的不平等危机具有深远的影响,特别是在危险的帮助困境的背景下。本研究从特质和情境两个层面探讨了主观社会地位与亲社会风险行为的关系及其中介机制。研究1采用问卷调查的方法考察了特质主观社会地位、整体思维和PRB意向之间的关系。研究2采用实验方法进一步考察情境主观社会地位与PRB的因果关系、边界条件和中介机制。结果表明,地位低的个体(相对于地位高的个体)倾向于在特质和情境主观社会地位下进行更多的PRB。这种差异只存在于高危状态。整体思维在主观社会地位与PRB的关系中起中介作用。这对于减轻社会地位差异对个体心理和行为的负面影响,促进不同社会地位个体在危险情境中亲社会水平的提高具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
Child inhibitory control in toddlerhood: associations with child interaction skills with the mother. Effects of cognitively engaging physical activity on executive function, mental health, and physical fitness in school-age children: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Body image dissatisfaction among adolescents residing in Kathmandu Metropolitan City: a community-based cross-sectional study. Patriarchal dominance, employment anxiety and subjective career success among career widows in Nigeria. Examining the moderating role of work engagement in predicting deviant behaviour: a study of work culture and organisational injustice among police officers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1