Comparative analysis of shear behavior in continuous low-strength RC beams strengthened with BFRP and CFRP: An experimental and numerical investigation

IF 7 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES Composites Part C Open Access Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomc.2025.100575
Mu'tasim Abdel-Jaber , Rawand Al-Nsour , Aseel Almahameed , Ahmed Ashteyat
{"title":"Comparative analysis of shear behavior in continuous low-strength RC beams strengthened with BFRP and CFRP: An experimental and numerical investigation","authors":"Mu'tasim Abdel-Jaber ,&nbsp;Rawand Al-Nsour ,&nbsp;Aseel Almahameed ,&nbsp;Ahmed Ashteyat","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomc.2025.100575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of Basalt Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) materials marks a significant advancement in sustainable construction. This study evaluates the impact of externally bonded BFRP and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) sheets and laminates on the shear strength of reinforced concrete (RC) beams with a compressive strength of 20 MPa. Seven full-scale, two-span RC beams, each four meters in length, were tested, with identical strengthening patterns applied to both BFRP and CFRP sheets to allow for a direct comparison. One beam served as a control sample to assess the effectiveness of the strengthening techniques. Results showed that CFRP improved the shear capacity of the beams by 38.3 % to 46.6 %, while BFRP provided an increase of 9.7 % to 32.5 %, demonstrating substantial gains in load-carrying capacity for both materials, though CFRP showed a higher performance boost while BFRP materials are an economical alternative for CFRP materials, and the most effective strengthening configuration for both fiber types is full side coverage, as it offers superior confinement of the concrete. These findings were well-aligned with Finite Element Modeling predictions and theoretical expectations, closely matching ACI 440.2R-08 guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34525,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part C Open Access","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100575"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part C Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682025000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of Basalt Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) materials marks a significant advancement in sustainable construction. This study evaluates the impact of externally bonded BFRP and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) sheets and laminates on the shear strength of reinforced concrete (RC) beams with a compressive strength of 20 MPa. Seven full-scale, two-span RC beams, each four meters in length, were tested, with identical strengthening patterns applied to both BFRP and CFRP sheets to allow for a direct comparison. One beam served as a control sample to assess the effectiveness of the strengthening techniques. Results showed that CFRP improved the shear capacity of the beams by 38.3 % to 46.6 %, while BFRP provided an increase of 9.7 % to 32.5 %, demonstrating substantial gains in load-carrying capacity for both materials, though CFRP showed a higher performance boost while BFRP materials are an economical alternative for CFRP materials, and the most effective strengthening configuration for both fiber types is full side coverage, as it offers superior confinement of the concrete. These findings were well-aligned with Finite Element Modeling predictions and theoretical expectations, closely matching ACI 440.2R-08 guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BFRP与CFRP加固低强度连续RC梁抗剪性能对比分析:试验与数值研究
玄武岩纤维增强聚合物(BFRP)材料的集成标志着可持续建筑的重大进步。本研究对抗压强度为20 MPa的钢筋混凝土(RC)梁的抗剪强度进行了外粘接BFRP和碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)薄板和层压板的影响评估。七个全尺寸的两跨RC梁,每个长度为4米,采用相同的强化模式应用于BFRP和CFRP板,以便进行直接比较。其中一根梁作为对照样本,评估加固技术的有效性。结果表明,CFRP提高了梁的抗剪能力38.3%至46.6%,而BFRP增加了9.7%至32.5%,表明两种材料的承载能力都有实质性的提高,尽管CFRP表现出更高的性能提升,而BFRP材料是CFRP材料的经济替代品,两种纤维类型最有效的加固配置是全侧覆盖,因为它提供了优越的混凝土约束。这些发现与有限元建模预测和理论期望非常吻合,与ACI 440.2R-08指南非常吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Composites Part C Open Access
Composites Part C Open Access Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
96
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Thermo-mechanical performance evaluation of hybrid NiTi/CF-PEKK composite laminates using experiments and machine learning approaches A review on sustainable bamboo fibre composites in construction: Recent advancements, properties and future perspectives Mechanical behaviour of additively manufactured ceramic–epoxy interpenetrating phase composites with bioinspired nacre-like architecture Sustainable resin development for the strategic upcycling of waste fly ash into high-performance polymer composites Effect of recycled PET microfibers and Nano-clay on the mechanical behavior of HDPE hybrid composites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1