Methamphetamine and traumatic brain injury outcomes: an analysis of 29,416 patients from the national trauma data bank.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Brain injury Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2025.2469705
Nicholas W Sheets, Yan Shen, Jeneva M Garland, David S Plurad, Lori F Harbour, Alessandro Orlando, Samir M Fakhry
{"title":"Methamphetamine and traumatic brain injury outcomes: an analysis of 29,416 patients from the national trauma data bank.","authors":"Nicholas W Sheets, Yan Shen, Jeneva M Garland, David S Plurad, Lori F Harbour, Alessandro Orlando, Samir M Fakhry","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2469705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methamphetamine (Meth) use is rising in the US. Most research focuses on severe TBI, neglecting milder cases. We evaluated Meth's impact on patient outcomes and hospital resource use across all TBI severities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) patients from 2017-2019, aged 18-54, with near-isolated TBI, a drug screen, and negative blood alcohol. Meth+ patients were compared to Meth- patients on demographics, injury severity, and outcomes using χ² and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 29,416 patients with TBI patients, 337 (1%) were Meth+. Meth+ patients had significantly higher ICU admissions (61% vs. 50%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (32% vs. 22%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and tracheostomy (7% vs. 4%, <i>p</i> < 0.008). Meth+ had longer hospital stays (median 4 vs. 3 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and higher cerebral monitor use (8% vs. 5%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Mortality rates were similar (5% vs. 5%, <i>p</i> = 0.46). Meth+ patients had more preexisting mental health/personality (20% vs. 12%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and substance use disorders (44% vs. 6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Meth use in patients with near-isolated TBI patients is linked to greater injury severity, increased resource use, and longer hospital stays but does not significantly impact mortality. Targeted interventions are needed to manage clinical challenges and optimize resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2025.2469705","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Methamphetamine (Meth) use is rising in the US. Most research focuses on severe TBI, neglecting milder cases. We evaluated Meth's impact on patient outcomes and hospital resource use across all TBI severities.

Methods: This study included National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) patients from 2017-2019, aged 18-54, with near-isolated TBI, a drug screen, and negative blood alcohol. Meth+ patients were compared to Meth- patients on demographics, injury severity, and outcomes using χ² and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

Results: Of 29,416 patients with TBI patients, 337 (1%) were Meth+. Meth+ patients had significantly higher ICU admissions (61% vs. 50%, p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (32% vs. 22%, p < 0.001), and tracheostomy (7% vs. 4%, p < 0.008). Meth+ had longer hospital stays (median 4 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001) and higher cerebral monitor use (8% vs. 5%, p < 0.05). Mortality rates were similar (5% vs. 5%, p = 0.46). Meth+ patients had more preexisting mental health/personality (20% vs. 12%, p < 0.001) and substance use disorders (44% vs. 6%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Meth use in patients with near-isolated TBI patients is linked to greater injury severity, increased resource use, and longer hospital stays but does not significantly impact mortality. Targeted interventions are needed to manage clinical challenges and optimize resource utilization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Medical complications and advance medical decision-making in the minimally conscious state. Responding to the ongoing pandemic-related challenges of individuals with brain injury through the perspective of community-service in Canada: A qualitative study. Understanding 'quality' in adult traumatic brain injury rehabilitation from the perspectives of different stakeholders: a participatory mixed methods study. Understanding factors influencing exercise program adherence for youth with persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS). Dodecafluoropentane improves neuro-behavioral outcomes and return of spontaneous circulation rate in a swine model of cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1