Non-Invasive Diagnostic Strategies for Membranous Nephropathy in the NEPTUNE Study.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.2215/CJN.0000000671
Jarcy Zee, Jonathan J Hogan, Ahmed Abdullah, Lili Liu, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Laurence H Beck
{"title":"Non-Invasive Diagnostic Strategies for Membranous Nephropathy in the NEPTUNE Study.","authors":"Jarcy Zee, Jonathan J Hogan, Ahmed Abdullah, Lili Liu, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Laurence H Beck","doi":"10.2215/CJN.0000000671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical practice guidelines recommend that a kidney biopsy is no longer required to confirm a diagnosis of membranous nephropathy (MN) in patients with nephrotic syndrome and a positive test for anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies (PLA2R-Ab). However, the optimal diagnostic strategy for using the PLA2R-Ab enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), PLA2R-Ab indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) test, and genetic risk score for diagnosing MN, including the tests' optimal thresholds for positivity among incident patients with proteinuria, is still unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used serum samples at or before the first clinically indicated kidney biopsy from participants in the Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) to analyze test performance characteristics using different combinations and cut-offs of the PLA2R-Ab ELISA, IIF, and genetic risk score for diagnosing MN. Secondary analyses included serum samples within 6 months after biopsy but before any immunosuppression use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 325 study participants with serum samples available on or before the day of kidney biopsy and an additional 143 study participants with samples within six months after biopsy but before any immunosuppression use. Of these participants, 26% (N=85) had biopsy-confirmed MN. The combination of ELISA ≥2 RU/mL and positive IIF was the optimal approach, with sensitivity of 0.60, specificity of 1.00, negative predictive value of 0.92, and positive predictive value of 1.00. Using IIF to confirm only borderline ELISA titers between 2-20 RU/ml resulted in similar sensitivity but specificity of >0.99. In our multiethnic study sample, we did not find improved diagnostic performance with the addition of genetic risk scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the NEPTUNE cohort, combined PLA2R-Ab testing with ELISA and IIF provided optimal test characteristics in making a non-invasive diagnosis of MN before or soon after kidney biopsy, including in patients with sub-nephrotic proteinuria. Further studies in multiethnic populations are needed to assess whether genetic data can augment this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50681,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.0000000671","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines recommend that a kidney biopsy is no longer required to confirm a diagnosis of membranous nephropathy (MN) in patients with nephrotic syndrome and a positive test for anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies (PLA2R-Ab). However, the optimal diagnostic strategy for using the PLA2R-Ab enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), PLA2R-Ab indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) test, and genetic risk score for diagnosing MN, including the tests' optimal thresholds for positivity among incident patients with proteinuria, is still unknown.

Methods: We used serum samples at or before the first clinically indicated kidney biopsy from participants in the Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) to analyze test performance characteristics using different combinations and cut-offs of the PLA2R-Ab ELISA, IIF, and genetic risk score for diagnosing MN. Secondary analyses included serum samples within 6 months after biopsy but before any immunosuppression use.

Results: There were 325 study participants with serum samples available on or before the day of kidney biopsy and an additional 143 study participants with samples within six months after biopsy but before any immunosuppression use. Of these participants, 26% (N=85) had biopsy-confirmed MN. The combination of ELISA ≥2 RU/mL and positive IIF was the optimal approach, with sensitivity of 0.60, specificity of 1.00, negative predictive value of 0.92, and positive predictive value of 1.00. Using IIF to confirm only borderline ELISA titers between 2-20 RU/ml resulted in similar sensitivity but specificity of >0.99. In our multiethnic study sample, we did not find improved diagnostic performance with the addition of genetic risk scores.

Conclusions: In the NEPTUNE cohort, combined PLA2R-Ab testing with ELISA and IIF provided optimal test characteristics in making a non-invasive diagnosis of MN before or soon after kidney biopsy, including in patients with sub-nephrotic proteinuria. Further studies in multiethnic populations are needed to assess whether genetic data can augment this approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:临床实践指南建议,对于肾病综合征和抗磷脂酶 A2 受体抗体(PLA2R-Ab)检测呈阳性的患者,不再需要通过肾活检来确诊膜性肾病(MN)。然而,使用 PLA2R-Ab 酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)、PLA2R-Ab 间接免疫荧光试验(IIF)和遗传风险评分诊断 MN 的最佳诊断策略,包括这些试验在出现蛋白尿的患者中的最佳阳性阈值,仍是未知数:我们使用肾病综合征研究网络(NEPTUNE)参与者在首次有临床指征的肾活检时或之前的血清样本,分析了使用 PLA2R-Ab ELISA、IIF 和遗传风险评分的不同组合和临界值诊断 MN 的检验性能特征。二次分析包括活检后 6 个月内但使用任何免疫抑制剂之前的血清样本:有 325 名研究参与者在肾活检当天或之前获得了血清样本,另有 143 名研究参与者在活检后 6 个月内但在使用任何免疫抑制剂之前获得了样本。在这些参与者中,26%(85 人)经活检证实患有 MN。ELISA ≥2 RU/mL 和 IIF 阳性的组合是最佳方法,灵敏度为 0.60,特异性为 1.00,阴性预测值为 0.92,阳性预测值为 1.00。使用 IIF 仅确认 ELISA 滴度在 2-20 RU/ml 之间的边缘值,灵敏度相似,但特异性大于 0.99。在我们的多种族研究样本中,我们没有发现增加遗传风险评分能提高诊断效果:在 NEPTUNE 队列中,ELISA 和 IIF 联合 PLA2R-Ab 检测具有最佳的检测特性,可在肾活检前或肾活检后不久对 MN 进行无创诊断,包括对肾病蛋白尿患者。需要在多种族人群中开展进一步研究,以评估基因数据是否能增强这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology strives to establish itself as the foremost authority in communicating and influencing advances in clinical nephrology by (1) swiftly and effectively disseminating pivotal developments in clinical and translational research in nephrology, encompassing innovations in research methods and care delivery; (2) providing context for these advances in relation to future research directions and patient care; and (3) becoming a key voice on issues with potential implications for the clinical practice of nephrology, particularly within the United States. Original manuscript topics cover a range of areas, including Acid/Base and Electrolyte Disorders, Acute Kidney Injury and ICU Nephrology, Chronic Kidney Disease, Clinical Nephrology, Cystic Kidney Disease, Diabetes and the Kidney, Genetics, Geriatric and Palliative Nephrology, Glomerular and Tubulointerstitial Diseases, Hypertension, Maintenance Dialysis, Mineral Metabolism, Nephrolithiasis, and Transplantation.
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Trial of Nicotinamide Riboside and Coenzyme Q10 on Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in CKD. Non-Invasive Diagnostic Strategies for Membranous Nephropathy in the NEPTUNE Study. Life's Essential 8, Cardiovascular Health, and Chronic Kidney Disease Progression among Hispanic/Latino Adults, the HCHS/SOL Study. Food Insecurity and Risk of Hospitalization among Adults Receiving In-Center Hemodialysis IgG4-Related Kidney Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1