Evaluation of Diagnoses According to ICD-10 and ICPC-2 in Family Medicine Practice: A Retrospective Study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1155/ijcp/7146424
Olgun Göktaş
{"title":"Evaluation of Diagnoses According to ICD-10 and ICPC-2 in Family Medicine Practice: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Olgun Göktaş","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/7146424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> After the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, briefly ICD (ICD-10), the World Health Organization (WHO) accepted the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2) as a reason for encounter classification of diagnoses in primary healthcare services. The study aimed to assess the degree of alignment between diagnoses encoded with the ICD-10 and, those coded using the ICPC-2.</p>\n <p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> We collected the diagnoses coded with the ICD-10 of 42,782 patients registered in the Uludağ University Family Health Center, Bursa, Turkey. The ICD-10 codes were converted to ICPC-2 codes with the program in the family medicine information registration system. Diagnoses in the database were analyzed. <i>p</i> values less than 0.05 were considered significant in the study. Analyses were made with the SPSS 25.0 package program.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Of the 42,782 diagnoses with codes in ICD-10, a total of 218 diagnoses (0.51%) did not have an equivalent in ICPC-2. On the other hand, it was determined that a total of 463 diagnoses (1.08%) in ICD-10 had 2 or more codes in ICPC-2.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> According to our results in family medicine practice, the equivalents of ICD-10 and ICPC-2 codes were different in number and percentage. It is ideal for individual health and research that the diagnosis codes in family medicine are the same as the codes in other secondary and tertiary care clinics. Since health requires holisticity, we recommend that both classifications be integrated and revised to be globally understandable and provide complementary coding in different clinical applications.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/7146424","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/7146424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: After the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, briefly ICD (ICD-10), the World Health Organization (WHO) accepted the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2) as a reason for encounter classification of diagnoses in primary healthcare services. The study aimed to assess the degree of alignment between diagnoses encoded with the ICD-10 and, those coded using the ICPC-2.

Materials and Methods: We collected the diagnoses coded with the ICD-10 of 42,782 patients registered in the Uludağ University Family Health Center, Bursa, Turkey. The ICD-10 codes were converted to ICPC-2 codes with the program in the family medicine information registration system. Diagnoses in the database were analyzed. p values less than 0.05 were considered significant in the study. Analyses were made with the SPSS 25.0 package program.

Results: Of the 42,782 diagnoses with codes in ICD-10, a total of 218 diagnoses (0.51%) did not have an equivalent in ICPC-2. On the other hand, it was determined that a total of 463 diagnoses (1.08%) in ICD-10 had 2 or more codes in ICPC-2.

Conclusion: According to our results in family medicine practice, the equivalents of ICD-10 and ICPC-2 codes were different in number and percentage. It is ideal for individual health and research that the diagnosis codes in family medicine are the same as the codes in other secondary and tertiary care clinics. Since health requires holisticity, we recommend that both classifications be integrated and revised to be globally understandable and provide complementary coding in different clinical applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
In the Third Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic, the Worry of Applying to the Prosthodontics Clinic or Transmitting COVID-19 to Relatives Can Cause Anxiety/Depression and Not Being Able to Wear a Mask During Treatment Can Also Cause Anxiety Evaluation of Diagnoses According to ICD-10 and ICPC-2 in Family Medicine Practice: A Retrospective Study Major Etiologies of Male Infertility Among Couples Attending Fertility Clinics in Osun State, Nigeria: Findings From a Mixed-Method Study Diagnostic Role of Plateletcrit in Pleural Effusion Effect of Iron Accumulation on Bone Mineral Density in Patients Diagnosed With Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1