Factors impacting mortality and withdrawal of life sustaining therapy in severe traumatic brain injury.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Brain injury Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2025.2472197
Varun Mishra, Jennifer Bath, Ellen Harvey, Melissa Martinez, Justin Weppner
{"title":"Factors impacting mortality and withdrawal of life sustaining therapy in severe traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Varun Mishra, Jennifer Bath, Ellen Harvey, Melissa Martinez, Justin Weppner","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2472197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the correlation between withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) and established prognostic indicators, as well as identify additional factors that may influence the timing of WLST.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study examined adult patients admitted between 8/1/18 and 7/31/21 with severe TBI. A case group of 164 individuals who underwent WLST after TBI was matched 1:1 to a control group of 164 individuals with TBI who did not undergo WLST. Clinical indicators of poor prognosis were recorded, and functional recovery of control subjects was evaluated using Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 328 individuals (66 ± 19.9 years). Significant findings revealed lower GCS scores and shorter hospital stays in the case group compared to controls. Bilaterally absent pupillary responses were more common in cases (54.8%) and associated with shorter time to WLST and poorer functional outcomes in controls. Palliative care consultations and DNR code status were associated with time to WLST and functional outcomes. Non-geriatric control patients had better functional outcomes at follow-up (GOSE 6.3 ± 1.7) than geriatric patients (3.1 ± 1.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings emphasize the importance of standardized guidelines, objective indicators, and avoiding nihilism in making WLST decisions as many control subjects achieved functional recovery at varying levels of independence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"689-696"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2025.2472197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the correlation between withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) and established prognostic indicators, as well as identify additional factors that may influence the timing of WLST.

Methods: This retrospective case-control study examined adult patients admitted between 8/1/18 and 7/31/21 with severe TBI. A case group of 164 individuals who underwent WLST after TBI was matched 1:1 to a control group of 164 individuals with TBI who did not undergo WLST. Clinical indicators of poor prognosis were recorded, and functional recovery of control subjects was evaluated using Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE).

Results: The study involved 328 individuals (66 ± 19.9 years). Significant findings revealed lower GCS scores and shorter hospital stays in the case group compared to controls. Bilaterally absent pupillary responses were more common in cases (54.8%) and associated with shorter time to WLST and poorer functional outcomes in controls. Palliative care consultations and DNR code status were associated with time to WLST and functional outcomes. Non-geriatric control patients had better functional outcomes at follow-up (GOSE 6.3 ± 1.7) than geriatric patients (3.1 ± 1.5).

Conclusions: These findings emphasize the importance of standardized guidelines, objective indicators, and avoiding nihilism in making WLST decisions as many control subjects achieved functional recovery at varying levels of independence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响重型创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和停止生命维持治疗的因素。
目的:评估维持生命治疗(WLST)停药与既定预后指标的相关性,并确定可能影响WLST停药时间的其他因素。方法:本回顾性病例对照研究调查了18年8月1日至21年7月31日收治的严重TBI成年患者。病例组为164例脑外伤后行WLST的患者,与对照组164例未行WLST的患者进行1:1匹配。记录预后不良的临床指标,采用扩展格拉斯哥结局量表(GOSE)评价对照组的功能恢复情况。结果:共纳入328例(66±19.9岁)。重要的研究结果显示,与对照组相比,病例组的GCS评分较低,住院时间较短。双侧瞳孔无反应在病例中更为常见(54.8%),并且与对照组较短的WLST时间和较差的功能结果相关。姑息治疗咨询和DNR代码状态与WLST时间和功能结果相关。随访时,非老年对照患者的功能结局(GOSE为6.3±1.7)优于老年患者(GOSE为3.1±1.5)。结论:这些研究结果强调了标准化指南、客观指标和避免虚无主义在做出WLST决策中的重要性,因为许多对照受试者在不同程度的独立性下实现了功能恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Association between activities of daily living independence and observational attention ratings in patients with acute stroke. The protective effects of melatonin postconditioning in cerebral ischemia may be mediated through the modulation of FUNDC1 and Bnip3 levels. Utilizing APACHE II score for early detection of deterioration in neurosurgery ICU: a prospective cohort study. Whiteout sign on dSIR MRI: A case series highlighting symptom-associated white matter changes not observed on standard T2-FLAIR. Developmental considerations in hydrocephalus after traumatic brain injury in children: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1