Community-engaged curriculum development using racial justice and biomedical lenses to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in black individuals with rheumatologic conditions.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1493331
Eseosa Olive Osaghae, Greta Sirek, Tonya Roberson, Mia Chandler, Ariel Childs, Monica Crespo-Bosque, Gina Curry, Amar Dhand, Mary Dollear, Alice Eggelston, Nnenna Ezeh, Dieufort Fleurissaint, Denice Garrett, Gail Granville, Muriel Jean-Jacques, Elena Losina, Holly Milaeger, Lutfiyya Muhammad, Mary Ann Nelson, Chisa Nosamiefan, Bisola Ojikutu, Neil Pillai, Mary Beth Son, Marie Jacques Toussaint, Ana Valle, Jessica N Williams, Michael York, Karen Mancera-Cuevas, Candace H Feldman, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman
{"title":"Community-engaged curriculum development using racial justice and biomedical lenses to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in black individuals with rheumatologic conditions.","authors":"Eseosa Olive Osaghae, Greta Sirek, Tonya Roberson, Mia Chandler, Ariel Childs, Monica Crespo-Bosque, Gina Curry, Amar Dhand, Mary Dollear, Alice Eggelston, Nnenna Ezeh, Dieufort Fleurissaint, Denice Garrett, Gail Granville, Muriel Jean-Jacques, Elena Losina, Holly Milaeger, Lutfiyya Muhammad, Mary Ann Nelson, Chisa Nosamiefan, Bisola Ojikutu, Neil Pillai, Mary Beth Son, Marie Jacques Toussaint, Ana Valle, Jessica N Williams, Michael York, Karen Mancera-Cuevas, Candace H Feldman, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1493331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine in reducing mortality and illness severity, racial inequities in vaccination uptake persist. Among individuals with rheumatologic conditions who are often immunocompromised, the impact of disparities in preventive care threatens to widen existing inequities in adverse outcomes related to COVID-19 infection. There exists an urgent need to develop interventions that reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and promote vaccine uptake. We leveraged long-standing community-academic partnerships in two cities to develop a curriculum that will be part of an intervention to decrease COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy within Black communities. We describe the collaborative efforts that resulted in the creation of two interactive virtual curricula with similar core content but different theoretical lenses. One lens uses a racial justice approach to acknowledge the effects of historical and current structural racism on vaccine hesitancy, the other utilizes a traditional biomedical lens. In a future trial, we will compare the efficacy of these curricula to empower Black individuals identified as Popular Opinion Leaders (POLs), or trusted community members with large social networks, to disseminate health information to promote COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Strategies to reduce racial inequities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake must begin with accurately identifying and empathetically acknowledging the root causes of vaccine hesitancy, as well as addressing nuanced concerns that drive vaccine avoidance among Black individuals. Community engagement and collaboration are central in creating interventions to develop and test culturally relevant strategies, as observed with our curricula, that bridge scientific efforts with community concerns and practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1493331"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1493331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine in reducing mortality and illness severity, racial inequities in vaccination uptake persist. Among individuals with rheumatologic conditions who are often immunocompromised, the impact of disparities in preventive care threatens to widen existing inequities in adverse outcomes related to COVID-19 infection. There exists an urgent need to develop interventions that reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and promote vaccine uptake. We leveraged long-standing community-academic partnerships in two cities to develop a curriculum that will be part of an intervention to decrease COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy within Black communities. We describe the collaborative efforts that resulted in the creation of two interactive virtual curricula with similar core content but different theoretical lenses. One lens uses a racial justice approach to acknowledge the effects of historical and current structural racism on vaccine hesitancy, the other utilizes a traditional biomedical lens. In a future trial, we will compare the efficacy of these curricula to empower Black individuals identified as Popular Opinion Leaders (POLs), or trusted community members with large social networks, to disseminate health information to promote COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Strategies to reduce racial inequities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake must begin with accurately identifying and empathetically acknowledging the root causes of vaccine hesitancy, as well as addressing nuanced concerns that drive vaccine avoidance among Black individuals. Community engagement and collaboration are central in creating interventions to develop and test culturally relevant strategies, as observed with our curricula, that bridge scientific efforts with community concerns and practices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用种族公正和生物医学视角开发社区参与的课程,以解决患有风湿病的黑人COVID-19疫苗犹豫问题。
尽管COVID-19疫苗在降低死亡率和疾病严重程度方面有效,但接种疫苗方面的种族不平等现象仍然存在。在经常免疫功能低下的风湿病患者中,预防保健方面的差异可能会扩大与COVID-19感染相关的不良结局方面现有的不公平现象。目前迫切需要制定干预措施,减少COVID-19疫苗犹豫并促进疫苗接种。我们利用两个城市的长期社区学术合作伙伴关系开发了一门课程,该课程将成为减少黑人社区对COVID-19疫苗犹豫的干预措施的一部分。我们描述了导致创建两个核心内容相似但理论视角不同的交互式虚拟课程的合作努力。一个镜头使用种族正义的方法来承认历史和当前的结构性种族主义对疫苗犹豫的影响,另一个镜头使用传统的生物医学镜头。在未来的试验中,我们将比较这些课程的有效性,以使被确定为流行意见领袖(pol)的黑人或具有大型社交网络的可信赖社区成员能够传播健康信息以促进COVID-19疫苗的吸收。减少COVID-19疫苗接种中种族不平等现象的战略必须首先准确识别和同情地承认疫苗犹豫的根本原因,并解决导致黑人回避疫苗的细微问题。正如我们的课程所观察到的那样,社区参与和合作是创建干预措施以开发和测试与文化相关的战略的核心,它将科学努力与社区关注和实践联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
An individual with multiple high-risk links uncovered: an epidemiological investigation based on molecular network analysis. Associations of electronic health literacy with related factors in individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional analysis. Animal contact-related nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica outbreaks in humans in the U.S. (2009-2022): serovar-specific temporal trends and associations with exposure sources and settings. A commentary on GST reforms and their effect on cancer care in India. Predicting patient dropout: a nomogram for loss to follow-up after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1