The current status of psychological birth trauma in women who had a vaginal delivery and associated factors: a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539305
Hong Qin, Weiwei Wei, Xiaoyan Feng, Xiaochang Yang
{"title":"The current status of psychological birth trauma in women who had a vaginal delivery and associated factors: a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study.","authors":"Hong Qin, Weiwei Wei, Xiaoyan Feng, Xiaochang Yang","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Individuals vary in their perception of psychological birth trauma (PBT), with some individuals progressing to postpartum post-traumatic stress disorder (PP-PTSD). However, from both preventive and developmental perspectives, PBT and PP-PTSD have received limited attention in China. This study examines the prevalence and influencing factors of PBT among women who underwent vaginal delivery in Chongqing, China, at 3 days and 42 days postpartum, as well as the correlation between perceived PP-PTSD and PBT, aiming to enhance understanding in this field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study was conducted on women who had a vaginal delivery admitted to a grade III-A general hospital using convenience sampling between February and April of 2024. Participants were questioned using a general questionnaire, the Birth Trauma Perception Scale for Women During Vaginal Delivery (BTPS-WVD) scale, and the Postpartum Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Scale (PP-PTSD) at 3 and 42 days postpartum. Univariate and multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with PBT at 42 days postpartum. Pearson correlation analysis was used to investigate the correlation between PBT and PP-PTSD in women who had a vaginal delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average score of PBT at 3 and 42 days postpartum were (43.37 ± 9.46) and (51.40 ± 13.54) respectively, the difference was statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the dimensions of medical support trauma perception, delivery pain trauma perception, family support trauma perception, and delivery outcome trauma perception (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The average score of PP-PTSD at 3 and 42 days postpartum were (22.38 ± 7.13) and (22.29 ± 5.77) respectively, with no statistical significance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The positive rate of PP-PTSD (score ≥ 38) at 3 and 42 days postpartum were 5 and 2%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that, feeding mode, the effect of breast swelling on mood, mother separate from the newborn, separation time between mother and newborn, place of puerperium, psychological discomfort caused by delivering with others, use of epidural anesthesia, delivery time, advise others to deliver vaginally, the effects of wound pain, time of the postnatal wound pain and who decides on abnormal delivery were independently associated with PBT (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that, mother separate from the newborn, separation time between mother and newborn, place of puerperium, psychological discomfort caused by delivering with others, the effects of wound pain, time of wound pain, who decides on abnormal delivery were independently associated with PBT (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that, PBT and its four dimensions were positively correlated with PP-PTSD (<i>r</i> = 0.488, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women who experienced PBT during vaginal delivery reported significantly higher levels of perceived trauma at 42 days postpartum compared to 3 days postpartum. Clinical staff, family, and society should pay attention to the risk factors and take corresponding intervention measures to reduce the degree of PBT and promote maternal and child health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1539305"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Individuals vary in their perception of psychological birth trauma (PBT), with some individuals progressing to postpartum post-traumatic stress disorder (PP-PTSD). However, from both preventive and developmental perspectives, PBT and PP-PTSD have received limited attention in China. This study examines the prevalence and influencing factors of PBT among women who underwent vaginal delivery in Chongqing, China, at 3 days and 42 days postpartum, as well as the correlation between perceived PP-PTSD and PBT, aiming to enhance understanding in this field.

Methods: This questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study was conducted on women who had a vaginal delivery admitted to a grade III-A general hospital using convenience sampling between February and April of 2024. Participants were questioned using a general questionnaire, the Birth Trauma Perception Scale for Women During Vaginal Delivery (BTPS-WVD) scale, and the Postpartum Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Scale (PP-PTSD) at 3 and 42 days postpartum. Univariate and multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with PBT at 42 days postpartum. Pearson correlation analysis was used to investigate the correlation between PBT and PP-PTSD in women who had a vaginal delivery.

Results: The average score of PBT at 3 and 42 days postpartum were (43.37 ± 9.46) and (51.40 ± 13.54) respectively, the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the dimensions of medical support trauma perception, delivery pain trauma perception, family support trauma perception, and delivery outcome trauma perception (p < 0.05). The average score of PP-PTSD at 3 and 42 days postpartum were (22.38 ± 7.13) and (22.29 ± 5.77) respectively, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). The positive rate of PP-PTSD (score ≥ 38) at 3 and 42 days postpartum were 5 and 2%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that, feeding mode, the effect of breast swelling on mood, mother separate from the newborn, separation time between mother and newborn, place of puerperium, psychological discomfort caused by delivering with others, use of epidural anesthesia, delivery time, advise others to deliver vaginally, the effects of wound pain, time of the postnatal wound pain and who decides on abnormal delivery were independently associated with PBT (p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that, mother separate from the newborn, separation time between mother and newborn, place of puerperium, psychological discomfort caused by delivering with others, the effects of wound pain, time of wound pain, who decides on abnormal delivery were independently associated with PBT (p < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that, PBT and its four dimensions were positively correlated with PP-PTSD (r = 0.488, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Women who experienced PBT during vaginal delivery reported significantly higher levels of perceived trauma at 42 days postpartum compared to 3 days postpartum. Clinical staff, family, and society should pay attention to the risk factors and take corresponding intervention measures to reduce the degree of PBT and promote maternal and child health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
Economic autonomy as a determinant of physical activity behavior in Chinese older adults. Demand analysis of public sports service for older adults using Kano model. Design and assessment of a public health course as a general education elective for non-medical undergraduates. Assessing the nutrition knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors of food pantry managers: implications for healthier food environments. Associations between mobile phone involvement, BMI levels, and sleep quality among Chinese university students: evidence from a multi-regional large-scale survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1