Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and In-Hospital Mortality and Costs in Older Inpatients With and Without Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17710
Lujiao Huang, Xue Zhou, Yi Song, Xiong Xiao, Mingyu Cui, Zhu Zhu, Mengjiao Yang, Yu Pei, Tokie Anme
{"title":"Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and In-Hospital Mortality and Costs in Older Inpatients With and Without Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study","authors":"Lujiao Huang,&nbsp;Xue Zhou,&nbsp;Yi Song,&nbsp;Xiong Xiao,&nbsp;Mingyu Cui,&nbsp;Zhu Zhu,&nbsp;Mengjiao Yang,&nbsp;Yu Pei,&nbsp;Tokie Anme","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the association of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) with in-hospital mortality and costs in older inpatients and to compare these associations between cancer and non-cancer patients to inform clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective observational study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A hospital-based study was conducted in Southwest China between January 2018 and December 2020. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and anthropometric data of inpatients aged 65 and over, along with hospitalisation deaths and costs, were collected through the Hospital Information System of a general hospital and its affiliates. GNRI was calculated at admission to assess nutritional risk. Marginal structural models and stratified analyses estimated hospitalisation outcomes for older inpatients with and without various types of cancer across different nutritional risk grades.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 37,267 participants, in-hospital mortality and costs increased with higher nutritional risk. Older inpatients with major nutritional risk had significantly higher mortality and costs than those with no nutritional risk. Older cancer inpatients with major nutritional risk had the highest mortality and costs, significantly exceeding those of non-cancer inpatients. For each cancer type, increased nutritional risk was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and costs. Respiratory cancer inpatients with major nutritional risk had the highest mortality, while digestive cancer inpatients had the highest costs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Higher GNRI-assessed nutritional risk was associated with increased in-hospital mortality and costs in older inpatients, with stronger associations observed in cancer patients compared to non-cancer patients. Integrating GNRI into routine nursing practice could have significant clinical and economic benefits by promoting early nutritional screening in patient care and targeted interventions to reduce mortality and healthcare costs in high-risk populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care</h3>\n \n <p>Integrating GNRI assessment into routine patient care can effectively identify patients at high risk for in-hospital mortality and costs, allowing for timely nutritional support to enhance patient outcomes. GNRI, as a simple and globally applicable tool, can be integrated into diverse healthcare settings, providing an effective method for nutritional risk screening in older patients. When applying GNRI in clinical nursing and medical practice, special consideration should be given to the presence and type of cancer, as cancer patients with severe nutritional risk may benefit the most from targeted interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>What problem did the study address? This study investigated the association between GNRI-assessed nutritional risk and in-hospital mortality and costs in older inpatients. It further examined whether these associations differ between cancer and non-cancer patients and among different cancer types to improve clinical application.</p>\n \n <p>What were the main findings? The study found that higher nutritional risk assessed by GNRI was associated with increased in-hospital mortality and costs in older inpatients. These associations were stronger in older cancer patients compared to non-cancer patients, with respiratory cancers showing the highest mortality and digestive cancers incurring the highest costs. These findings emphasise the important role of nutritional screening using GNRI in patient care with varying clinical profiles and informing nursing and medical strategies globally, particularly in resource-limited settings.</p>\n \n <p>Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The findings are relevant to older inpatients in hospital settings worldwide, particularly those with cancer, as well as to nurses and healthcare professionals. GNRI provides a practical and easily implementable tool for them to assess nutritional risks upon admission and guide timely nutritional support strategies based on clinical profiles including cancer presence and type in older inpatients. Incorporating GNRI into routine nursing care, nurses and healthcare professionals will be better equipped to address nutritional risks, ultimately improving patient care and optimising clinical and economic outcomes for older patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Reporting Method</h3>\n \n <p>We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines, specifically following the STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) guidelines for reporting this observational study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>No public contribution was required in the design or conduct of this research. Patients contributed through data collected from the Hospital Information System, which was used for analysis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":"34 11","pages":"4630-4641"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocn.17710","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.17710","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To explore the association of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) with in-hospital mortality and costs in older inpatients and to compare these associations between cancer and non-cancer patients to inform clinical practice.

Design

Retrospective observational study.

Methods

A hospital-based study was conducted in Southwest China between January 2018 and December 2020. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and anthropometric data of inpatients aged 65 and over, along with hospitalisation deaths and costs, were collected through the Hospital Information System of a general hospital and its affiliates. GNRI was calculated at admission to assess nutritional risk. Marginal structural models and stratified analyses estimated hospitalisation outcomes for older inpatients with and without various types of cancer across different nutritional risk grades.

Results

Among 37,267 participants, in-hospital mortality and costs increased with higher nutritional risk. Older inpatients with major nutritional risk had significantly higher mortality and costs than those with no nutritional risk. Older cancer inpatients with major nutritional risk had the highest mortality and costs, significantly exceeding those of non-cancer inpatients. For each cancer type, increased nutritional risk was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and costs. Respiratory cancer inpatients with major nutritional risk had the highest mortality, while digestive cancer inpatients had the highest costs.

Conclusion

Higher GNRI-assessed nutritional risk was associated with increased in-hospital mortality and costs in older inpatients, with stronger associations observed in cancer patients compared to non-cancer patients. Integrating GNRI into routine nursing practice could have significant clinical and economic benefits by promoting early nutritional screening in patient care and targeted interventions to reduce mortality and healthcare costs in high-risk populations.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

Integrating GNRI assessment into routine patient care can effectively identify patients at high risk for in-hospital mortality and costs, allowing for timely nutritional support to enhance patient outcomes. GNRI, as a simple and globally applicable tool, can be integrated into diverse healthcare settings, providing an effective method for nutritional risk screening in older patients. When applying GNRI in clinical nursing and medical practice, special consideration should be given to the presence and type of cancer, as cancer patients with severe nutritional risk may benefit the most from targeted interventions.

Impact

What problem did the study address? This study investigated the association between GNRI-assessed nutritional risk and in-hospital mortality and costs in older inpatients. It further examined whether these associations differ between cancer and non-cancer patients and among different cancer types to improve clinical application.

What were the main findings? The study found that higher nutritional risk assessed by GNRI was associated with increased in-hospital mortality and costs in older inpatients. These associations were stronger in older cancer patients compared to non-cancer patients, with respiratory cancers showing the highest mortality and digestive cancers incurring the highest costs. These findings emphasise the important role of nutritional screening using GNRI in patient care with varying clinical profiles and informing nursing and medical strategies globally, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The findings are relevant to older inpatients in hospital settings worldwide, particularly those with cancer, as well as to nurses and healthcare professionals. GNRI provides a practical and easily implementable tool for them to assess nutritional risks upon admission and guide timely nutritional support strategies based on clinical profiles including cancer presence and type in older inpatients. Incorporating GNRI into routine nursing care, nurses and healthcare professionals will be better equipped to address nutritional risks, ultimately improving patient care and optimising clinical and economic outcomes for older patients.

Reporting Method

We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines, specifically following the STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) guidelines for reporting this observational study.

Patient or Public Contribution

No public contribution was required in the design or conduct of this research. Patients contributed through data collected from the Hospital Information System, which was used for analysis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年营养风险指数与住院癌症患者的住院死亡率和费用:一项回顾性观察研究。
目的:探讨老年营养风险指数(GNRI)与老年住院患者住院死亡率和住院费用的关系,并比较癌症和非癌症患者之间的这些关系,为临床实践提供依据。设计:回顾性观察性研究。方法:2018年1月至2020年12月在中国西南地区进行了一项以医院为基础的研究。通过一家综合医院及其附属医院的医院信息系统收集了65岁及以上住院患者的人口统计、临床、实验室和人体测量数据,以及住院死亡和费用。入院时计算GNRI以评估营养风险。边际结构模型和分层分析估计了不同营养风险等级中患有和不患有各种类型癌症的老年住院患者的住院结果。结果:在37267名参与者中,住院死亡率和费用随着营养风险的增加而增加。有重大营养风险的老年住院患者的死亡率和费用明显高于没有营养风险的住院患者。有重大营养风险的老年癌症住院患者死亡率和费用最高,显著超过非癌症住院患者。对于每种癌症类型,营养风险的增加与住院死亡率和费用的增加有关。有重大营养风险的呼吸系统癌症住院患者死亡率最高,而消化系统癌症住院患者的成本最高。结论:更高的gnri评估的营养风险与老年住院患者的住院死亡率和费用增加有关,与非癌症患者相比,在癌症患者中观察到更强的相关性。将GNRI纳入常规护理实践可以通过促进患者护理中的早期营养筛查和有针对性的干预措施来降低高风险人群的死亡率和医疗保健费用,从而产生显著的临床和经济效益。对专业和/或患者护理的影响:将GNRI评估纳入常规患者护理可以有效地识别院内死亡率和成本较高的患者,并允许及时提供营养支持,以提高患者的预后。GNRI作为一种简单且全球适用的工具,可以整合到各种医疗保健环境中,为老年患者的营养风险筛查提供一种有效方法。在临床护理和医疗实践中应用GNRI时,应特别考虑癌症的存在和类型,因为具有严重营养风险的癌症患者可能从有针对性的干预中获益最多。影响:研究解决了什么问题?本研究调查了gnri评估的营养风险与老年住院患者住院死亡率和费用之间的关系。它进一步研究了这些关联在癌症和非癌症患者之间以及不同癌症类型之间是否存在差异,以改善临床应用。主要发现是什么?研究发现,GNRI评估的较高营养风险与老年住院患者的住院死亡率和费用增加有关。与非癌症患者相比,这些关联在老年癌症患者中更为明显,呼吸系统癌症的死亡率最高,消化系统癌症的成本最高。这些发现强调了使用GNRI进行营养筛查在具有不同临床概况的患者护理中的重要作用,并为全球护理和医疗策略提供信息,特别是在资源有限的环境中。这项研究将对谁和在哪里产生影响?这些发现与世界各地住院的老年患者,特别是癌症患者,以及护士和医疗保健专业人员有关。GNRI为他们提供了一种实用且易于实施的工具,用于评估入院时的营养风险,并根据老年住院患者的临床概况(包括癌症的存在和类型)及时指导营养支持策略。将GNRI纳入日常护理,护士和医疗保健专业人员将更好地应对营养风险,最终改善患者护理并优化老年患者的临床和经济结果。报告方法:我们遵循相关的EQUATOR指南,特别是在报告本观察性研究时遵循STROBE(加强流行病学观察性研究的报告)指南。患者或公众贡献:本研究的设计或实施不需要公众贡献。患者通过从医院信息系统收集的数据进行贡献,该数据用于分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
Comment Letter on 'Siblings of Children With Cancer and Their Challenges Across Everyday Life Contexts: A Two-Phase Qualitative Study in Denmark'. From Laboratory to Bedside: Technical Enhancements for Clinical-Grade AI Wound Assessment Systems. Beyond Borders: Diaspora Nurses' Voices on Retention, Respect and Resilience. Glasgow Coma Scale Practice Among Emergency Nurses in China: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Confidential Conversations in Palliative Care: An Ethnographic Exploration of Trust and Interpersonal Relationship Between Nurse and Patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1