Nurses' Perceptions of Patient Violence: Exposure, Expectation, Risk Factors and Risk Tolerance

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17719
Darcy Copeland, Debra Culter, Mary Potter, Susie Tipton
{"title":"Nurses' Perceptions of Patient Violence: Exposure, Expectation, Risk Factors and Risk Tolerance","authors":"Darcy Copeland,&nbsp;Debra Culter,&nbsp;Mary Potter,&nbsp;Susie Tipton","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There are known risk factors for patient violence, but it is not known whether nurses are aware of them. Nurses' expectations regarding exposure to patient violence and risk tolerance have not been investigated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To examine hospital-based nurses' frequency of and expectations regarding exposure to patient violence, risk factors perceived to be associated with violence and self-reported risk tolerance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Cross-sectional, descriptive design following STROBE checklist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The sample consisted of 499 hospital-based nurses. Exposure to any patient violence was high; exposure to physical violence was less common and occurred less frequently. Most nurses did not think it was possible to eliminate patient violence in hospitals and expected to be exposed to it. Some of the personal patient risk factors identified (race, veteran status) have not been noted in the literature. Most nurses were identified as having high work-related risk tolerance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patient violence is a serious occupational risk for hospital-based nurses. Some of the rhetoric related to violence towards nurses presents this risk as something that is not part of nursing work, discounting widespread exposure. It is also presented as something that ought not to be tolerated when it does occur. Both positions seem misaligned with the reality that exposure to violence is high, as is nurses' risk tolerance. When conceptualised as a serious occupational risk, opportunities for prevention, mitigation and recovery efforts can emerge. If risk tolerance is recognised as a strength, for example, it could be bolstered in the context of interventions such as robust prevention and mitigation training.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":"34 11","pages":"4673-4682"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.17719","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There are known risk factors for patient violence, but it is not known whether nurses are aware of them. Nurses' expectations regarding exposure to patient violence and risk tolerance have not been investigated.

Aim

To examine hospital-based nurses' frequency of and expectations regarding exposure to patient violence, risk factors perceived to be associated with violence and self-reported risk tolerance.

Design

Cross-sectional, descriptive design following STROBE checklist.

Results

The sample consisted of 499 hospital-based nurses. Exposure to any patient violence was high; exposure to physical violence was less common and occurred less frequently. Most nurses did not think it was possible to eliminate patient violence in hospitals and expected to be exposed to it. Some of the personal patient risk factors identified (race, veteran status) have not been noted in the literature. Most nurses were identified as having high work-related risk tolerance.

Conclusions

Patient violence is a serious occupational risk for hospital-based nurses. Some of the rhetoric related to violence towards nurses presents this risk as something that is not part of nursing work, discounting widespread exposure. It is also presented as something that ought not to be tolerated when it does occur. Both positions seem misaligned with the reality that exposure to violence is high, as is nurses' risk tolerance. When conceptualised as a serious occupational risk, opportunities for prevention, mitigation and recovery efforts can emerge. If risk tolerance is recognised as a strength, for example, it could be bolstered in the context of interventions such as robust prevention and mitigation training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士对病人暴力的认知:暴露、预期、风险因素和风险承受能力。
背景:有已知的患者暴力危险因素,但不知道护士是否意识到这些因素。护士对暴露于病人暴力和风险承受能力的期望尚未调查。目的:检查医院护士对患者暴力的暴露频率和期望,被认为与暴力相关的风险因素和自我报告的风险承受能力。设计:按照STROBE检查表进行横断面、描述性设计。结果:样本包括499名医院护士。病人暴力的暴露率很高;遭受身体暴力的情况较少,发生的频率也较低。大多数护士认为不可能消除医院中的病人暴力,并期望接触到这种暴力。一些确定的个人患者风险因素(种族,退伍军人身份)在文献中未被注意到。大多数护士被认为具有较高的工作相关风险承受能力。结论:患者暴力是医院护士面临的严重职业风险。一些与针对护士的暴力行为有关的言论将这种风险视为不属于护理工作的一部分,从而低估了这种风险的广泛存在。当它确实发生时,它也被呈现为不应该被容忍的东西。这两种立场似乎都与现实不一致,即面对暴力的风险很高,护士的风险承受能力也很高。当将其定义为一种严重的职业风险时,就会出现预防、减轻和恢复工作的机会。例如,如果将风险承受能力视为一种优势,就可以在诸如强有力的预防和缓解培训等干预措施的背景下加强这种能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
The Invisible Nursing Work That Sustains Transfusion Safety. Nursing Students' Perceptions of Acceptable Use of Smartphones During Clinical Placement: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nursing Professional Organisations as Human Rights Intermediaries: Towards an Integrated Framework of Stakeholdership for Healthcare AI Governance. An Exploration of Emergency Healthcare Provision When Intimate Partner Abuse Is Identified. Comment on 'Comfort Needs of Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Qualitative Analysis Based on Kolcaba's Comfort Theory'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1