The Incidence and Risk Factors of Stress Hyperglycaemia in Patients Who Received Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17714
Huan Yao, Yukang Dong, Yan Jiang, Gui Xiao, Hai Gao, Jia Guo
{"title":"The Incidence and Risk Factors of Stress Hyperglycaemia in Patients Who Received Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Huan Yao, Yukang Dong, Yan Jiang, Gui Xiao, Hai Gao, Jia Guo","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the incidence and identify risk factors of stress hyperglycaemia among patients who received enteral nutrition (EN) in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress hyperglycaemia is common among ICU patients receiving EN and is related to worse outcomes. However, the factors associated with stress hyperglycaemia during EN remain unclear, especially among patients who are not diagnosed with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic medical records of 614 non-diabetic patients receiving EN at two ICUs in Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital were reviewed. Patients were classified into hyperglycemic and non-hyperglycemic groups. Social demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, nutrition therapy, and point-of-care blood glucose values were collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses identified risk factors for stress hyperglycaemia. This study followed the STROBE guideline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of stress hyperglycaemia among ICU patients without diabetes receiving EN was 35.50%. Multivariable analysis revealed that obesity (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), high carbohydrate intake (> 5.0 g/kg/day), and the use of semi-elemental EN solutions were independent risk factors for stress hyperglycaemia. In contrast, a moderate carbohydrate intake (3.0-3.9 g/kg/day) was associated with a significantly lower risk of stress hyperglycaemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 35.50% of ICU patients without diabetes experienced stress hyperglycaemia during EN. Potential risk factors included BMI ≥ 28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, high carbohydrate intake (> 5.0 g/kg/day), and the use of semi-elemental EN solutions. A moderate carbohydrate intake (3.0-3.9 g/kg/day) was protective. Future research should explore optimal carbohydrate intake ranges and personalised nutrition protocols to reduce stress hyperglycaemia in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Reducing stress hyperglycaemia in ICU patients without diabetes receiving EN is crucial. Recommendations include monitoring patients with BMI ≥ 28 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and considering moderate carbohydrate intake (3.0-3.9 g/kg/day), and reasonably selecting the type of enteral nutrition solution based on the patient's individual condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim and objectives: This study aimed to investigate the incidence and identify risk factors of stress hyperglycaemia among patients who received enteral nutrition (EN) in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Background: Stress hyperglycaemia is common among ICU patients receiving EN and is related to worse outcomes. However, the factors associated with stress hyperglycaemia during EN remain unclear, especially among patients who are not diagnosed with diabetes.

Design: A retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Electronic medical records of 614 non-diabetic patients receiving EN at two ICUs in Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital were reviewed. Patients were classified into hyperglycemic and non-hyperglycemic groups. Social demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, nutrition therapy, and point-of-care blood glucose values were collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses identified risk factors for stress hyperglycaemia. This study followed the STROBE guideline.

Results: The incidence of stress hyperglycaemia among ICU patients without diabetes receiving EN was 35.50%. Multivariable analysis revealed that obesity (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2), high carbohydrate intake (> 5.0 g/kg/day), and the use of semi-elemental EN solutions were independent risk factors for stress hyperglycaemia. In contrast, a moderate carbohydrate intake (3.0-3.9 g/kg/day) was associated with a significantly lower risk of stress hyperglycaemia.

Conclusions: The 35.50% of ICU patients without diabetes experienced stress hyperglycaemia during EN. Potential risk factors included BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2, high carbohydrate intake (> 5.0 g/kg/day), and the use of semi-elemental EN solutions. A moderate carbohydrate intake (3.0-3.9 g/kg/day) was protective. Future research should explore optimal carbohydrate intake ranges and personalised nutrition protocols to reduce stress hyperglycaemia in critically ill patients.

Relevance to clinical practice: Reducing stress hyperglycaemia in ICU patients without diabetes receiving EN is crucial. Recommendations include monitoring patients with BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 and considering moderate carbohydrate intake (3.0-3.9 g/kg/day), and reasonably selecting the type of enteral nutrition solution based on the patient's individual condition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
Constructing a Nursing Programme to Manage Intra-Abdominal Pressure in Neurocritical Care Patients: A Modified Delphi Study. Contributing Factors to Medication Administration Errors Among Novice Registered Nurses: An Integrative Review. Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and In-Hospital Mortality and Costs in Older Inpatients With and Without Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study. Nurses' Perceptions of Patient Violence: Exposure, Expectation, Risk Factors and Risk Tolerance. The Incidence and Risk Factors of Stress Hyperglycaemia in Patients Who Received Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1