{"title":"Restoration of Li+ Pathways in the [010] Direction during Direct Regeneration for Spent LiFePO4","authors":"Shuaipeng Hao, Yuelin Lv, Yi Zhang, Shuaiwei Liu, Zhouliang Tan, Wei Liu, Yuanguang Xia, Wen Yin, Yaqi Liao, Haijin Ji, Yuelin Kong, Yudi Shao, Yunhui Huang, Lixia Yuan","doi":"10.1039/d5ee00641d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LiFePO4 (LFP) cathodes primarily degrade due to Li+ depletion and Fe (III) phase formation, while preserving their crystal structure, rendering them ideal candidates for direct regeneration. In spent LFP, however, the Li+ transport pathways are obstructed by Fe2+ ions, which occupy the LiO6 octahedra and distortions in the O1-O2-O3-O3 tetrahedra, presenting significant challenges for direct regeneration. This study overcomes these challenges through tartaric acid (TA)-based hydrothermal treatment followed by brief annealing, enabling the successful regeneration of LFP by facilitating Li+ reinsertion along the [010] direction of the crystal structure. The regenerated LFP exhibits excellent electrochemical performance, delivering a discharge capacity of 150.5 mAh/g at 0.5 C, retaining 94.9% of its capacity after 500 cycles. Neutron pair distribution function (NPDF), Neutron powder diffraction (NPD) and theoretical calculations are employed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the improved performances. Results reveal that the performance enhancement is attributed to restoring Li⁺ diffusion pathways, including the eliminated Fe-Li anti-site defects and the expanded Li-conducting O1-O2-O3-O3 tetrahedra. Furthermore, this approach demonstrates broad applicability, enabling the regeneration of spent LFP at varying degradation levels while facilitating efficient, non-destructive cathode stripping.","PeriodicalId":72,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environmental Science","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":32.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ee00641d","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
LiFePO4 (LFP) cathodes primarily degrade due to Li+ depletion and Fe (III) phase formation, while preserving their crystal structure, rendering them ideal candidates for direct regeneration. In spent LFP, however, the Li+ transport pathways are obstructed by Fe2+ ions, which occupy the LiO6 octahedra and distortions in the O1-O2-O3-O3 tetrahedra, presenting significant challenges for direct regeneration. This study overcomes these challenges through tartaric acid (TA)-based hydrothermal treatment followed by brief annealing, enabling the successful regeneration of LFP by facilitating Li+ reinsertion along the [010] direction of the crystal structure. The regenerated LFP exhibits excellent electrochemical performance, delivering a discharge capacity of 150.5 mAh/g at 0.5 C, retaining 94.9% of its capacity after 500 cycles. Neutron pair distribution function (NPDF), Neutron powder diffraction (NPD) and theoretical calculations are employed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the improved performances. Results reveal that the performance enhancement is attributed to restoring Li⁺ diffusion pathways, including the eliminated Fe-Li anti-site defects and the expanded Li-conducting O1-O2-O3-O3 tetrahedra. Furthermore, this approach demonstrates broad applicability, enabling the regeneration of spent LFP at varying degradation levels while facilitating efficient, non-destructive cathode stripping.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environmental Science, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, publishes original research and review articles covering interdisciplinary topics in the (bio)chemical and (bio)physical sciences, as well as chemical engineering disciplines. Published monthly by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), a not-for-profit publisher, Energy & Environmental Science is recognized as a leading journal. It boasts an impressive impact factor of 8.500 as of 2009, ranking 8th among 140 journals in the category "Chemistry, Multidisciplinary," second among 71 journals in "Energy & Fuels," second among 128 journals in "Engineering, Chemical," and first among 181 scientific journals in "Environmental Sciences."
Energy & Environmental Science publishes various types of articles, including Research Papers (original scientific work), Review Articles, Perspectives, and Minireviews (feature review-type articles of broad interest), Communications (original scientific work of an urgent nature), Opinions (personal, often speculative viewpoints or hypotheses on current topics), and Analysis Articles (in-depth examination of energy-related issues).