To what extent can flexibility options reduce the need for hydrogen backup power plants?

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114551
Christoph Brunner , Steffi Misconel , Philipp Hauser , Dominik Möst
{"title":"To what extent can flexibility options reduce the need for hydrogen backup power plants?","authors":"Christoph Brunner ,&nbsp;Steffi Misconel ,&nbsp;Philipp Hauser ,&nbsp;Dominik Möst","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving a carbon-neutral power system based on renewable energy sources is a critical step toward net-zero emissions before 2050. However, weather-dependent variability of renewable energy generation necessitates various flexibility options to balance supply and demand. In addition to storage, demand-side flexibility from sector coupling (e.g., electrification of heating, transport, and industry) plays a significant role. Yet, the need for supply-side flexibility, particularly through dispatchable hydrogen power plants, remains unclear. In this context, the article addresses the following research question: How much firm capacity from hydrogen power plants is needed to ensure security of supply in a 100% renewable power system? Using a case study for Germany based on an electricity market model-based approach, this paper analyses the impact of different flexibility options on the capacity needs of hydrogen power plants. The results indicate that at least 46 GW of hydrogen power plants are required in a scenario with strong sector coupling and demand-side flexibility. A lack of flexibility options could substantially increase this capacity requirement. The analysis concludes with the policy recommendation that Germany’s current power plant strategy is only an initial step, and more substantial market incentives are essential to ensure adequate firm capacity in a carbon-neutral energy system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 114551"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525000588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving a carbon-neutral power system based on renewable energy sources is a critical step toward net-zero emissions before 2050. However, weather-dependent variability of renewable energy generation necessitates various flexibility options to balance supply and demand. In addition to storage, demand-side flexibility from sector coupling (e.g., electrification of heating, transport, and industry) plays a significant role. Yet, the need for supply-side flexibility, particularly through dispatchable hydrogen power plants, remains unclear. In this context, the article addresses the following research question: How much firm capacity from hydrogen power plants is needed to ensure security of supply in a 100% renewable power system? Using a case study for Germany based on an electricity market model-based approach, this paper analyses the impact of different flexibility options on the capacity needs of hydrogen power plants. The results indicate that at least 46 GW of hydrogen power plants are required in a scenario with strong sector coupling and demand-side flexibility. A lack of flexibility options could substantially increase this capacity requirement. The analysis concludes with the policy recommendation that Germany’s current power plant strategy is only an initial step, and more substantial market incentives are essential to ensure adequate firm capacity in a carbon-neutral energy system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
期刊最新文献
International trade barriers, export and industrial resilience: An empirical study based on the EU and USA antidumping and countervailing policies on photovoltaic products Jobs, skills and regional implications of the low carbon residential heat transition in the UK Editorial Board Charging forward: A greenhouse gas emissions analysis of New York State's electric vehicle and clean energy goals To what extent can flexibility options reduce the need for hydrogen backup power plants?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1