To what extent can flexibility options reduce the need for hydrogen backup power plants?

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Policy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114551
Christoph Brunner , Steffi Misconel , Philipp Hauser , Dominik Möst
{"title":"To what extent can flexibility options reduce the need for hydrogen backup power plants?","authors":"Christoph Brunner ,&nbsp;Steffi Misconel ,&nbsp;Philipp Hauser ,&nbsp;Dominik Möst","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving a carbon-neutral power system based on renewable energy sources is a critical step toward net-zero emissions before 2050. However, weather-dependent variability of renewable energy generation necessitates various flexibility options to balance supply and demand. In addition to storage, demand-side flexibility from sector coupling (e.g., electrification of heating, transport, and industry) plays a significant role. Yet, the need for supply-side flexibility, particularly through dispatchable hydrogen power plants, remains unclear. In this context, the article addresses the following research question: How much firm capacity from hydrogen power plants is needed to ensure security of supply in a 100% renewable power system? Using a case study for Germany based on an electricity market model-based approach, this paper analyses the impact of different flexibility options on the capacity needs of hydrogen power plants. The results indicate that at least 46 GW of hydrogen power plants are required in a scenario with strong sector coupling and demand-side flexibility. A lack of flexibility options could substantially increase this capacity requirement. The analysis concludes with the policy recommendation that Germany’s current power plant strategy is only an initial step, and more substantial market incentives are essential to ensure adequate firm capacity in a carbon-neutral energy system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 114551"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525000588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving a carbon-neutral power system based on renewable energy sources is a critical step toward net-zero emissions before 2050. However, weather-dependent variability of renewable energy generation necessitates various flexibility options to balance supply and demand. In addition to storage, demand-side flexibility from sector coupling (e.g., electrification of heating, transport, and industry) plays a significant role. Yet, the need for supply-side flexibility, particularly through dispatchable hydrogen power plants, remains unclear. In this context, the article addresses the following research question: How much firm capacity from hydrogen power plants is needed to ensure security of supply in a 100% renewable power system? Using a case study for Germany based on an electricity market model-based approach, this paper analyses the impact of different flexibility options on the capacity needs of hydrogen power plants. The results indicate that at least 46 GW of hydrogen power plants are required in a scenario with strong sector coupling and demand-side flexibility. A lack of flexibility options could substantially increase this capacity requirement. The analysis concludes with the policy recommendation that Germany’s current power plant strategy is only an initial step, and more substantial market incentives are essential to ensure adequate firm capacity in a carbon-neutral energy system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灵活性选项能在多大程度上减少对氢备用发电厂的需求?
实现基于可再生能源的碳中和电力系统是实现2050年前净零排放的关键一步。然而,可再生能源发电的天气依赖性变异性需要各种灵活的选择来平衡供需。除了存储之外,来自部门耦合的需求侧灵活性(例如,供暖、运输和工业电气化)也起着重要作用。然而,对供应侧灵活性的需求,特别是通过可调度的氢能发电厂,仍不明朗。在此背景下,本文解决了以下研究问题:在100%可再生能源系统中,需要多少氢电厂的企业产能来确保供应安全?本文以德国为例,采用基于电力市场模型的方法,分析了不同柔性方案对氢电厂容量需求的影响。结果表明,在具有强部门耦合和需求侧灵活性的情况下,至少需要46吉瓦的氢能发电厂。缺乏灵活性选项可能会大大增加这种能力需求。分析的结论是政策建议,德国目前的发电厂战略只是一个开始,更实质性的市场激励对于确保碳中和能源系统中足够的企业能力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
期刊最新文献
Urban development and the energy transition: Evidence from Chinese cities Can data infrastructure construction alleviate clean energy misallocation?—An analysis based on China's provincial data Mexico’s energy crossroads: Navigating a complex transition Geopolitical fragmentation and the clean energy transition: How economic sanctions hinder renewable energy development How do Indian states fare in electricity decarbonization? A consumption-based decomposition analysis at subnational level
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1