Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with two balancing mechanisms for heterogeneous UAV swarm path planning

IF 6.6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Applied Soft Computing Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112927
Xiuju Xu , Chengyu Xie , Linru Ma , Lin Yang , Tao Zhang
{"title":"Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with two balancing mechanisms for heterogeneous UAV swarm path planning","authors":"Xiuju Xu ,&nbsp;Chengyu Xie ,&nbsp;Linru Ma ,&nbsp;Lin Yang ,&nbsp;Tao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm path planning involves creating efficient routes based on task requirements to enable collaborative flight. Compared to homogeneous UAV swarm, the application scenarios of heterogeneous UAV swarm have become increasingly widespread. They can fully leverage the various capabilities of drones and show higher economic benefits. Existing research mainly focuses on homogeneous UAV swarms, and the model for uniformly describing heterogeneous UAV swarm from a functional perspective is insufficient. Differences in dynamic constraints and energy consumption models create challenges for accurately characterizing the path planning problem of heterogeneous UAV swarm. To supplement the above deficiencies, this article designs the scenario and composition structure of heterogeneous UAV swarm. The path-planning problem of heterogeneous UAV swarm is modeled as a multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem, in which a comprehensive energy consumption objective is constructed. To better balance multiple objectives and obtain high-quality solutions, a MOO evolutionary algorithm based on heterogeneous UAV swarm, namely HMOEA, is proposed. Specifically, HMOEA is implemented by combining the proposed two strategies. To verify the model’s feasibility and the algorithm’s effectiveness, numerical simulations and prototype simulations are provided. In numerical simulations, the proposed algorithm was compared with various advanced algorithms, i.e., NSGA-II, CIACO, AP-GWO, CL-DMSPSO, and DSNSGA-III, in two designed terrain problems. The results demonstrate that HMOEA not only outperforms the compared algorithms on convergence and diversity indicators increased over 4% and 2% respectively. Normal flight results were achieved in the two scenarios served by the prototype simulation, namely, urban buildings and forest scenes. Specific implementation and application can be achieved in military or civilian scenarios like reconnaissance and strike missions, search and rescue missions. The proposed model can adapt to more task scenarios, and the proposed method can provide faster and higher quality results for heterogeneous UAV swarm routes. In actual deployment, adjusting model parameters and optimizing the computing environment according to application requirements are worth further investigation to achieve optimal effect.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50737,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soft Computing","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 112927"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soft Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494625002388","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm path planning involves creating efficient routes based on task requirements to enable collaborative flight. Compared to homogeneous UAV swarm, the application scenarios of heterogeneous UAV swarm have become increasingly widespread. They can fully leverage the various capabilities of drones and show higher economic benefits. Existing research mainly focuses on homogeneous UAV swarms, and the model for uniformly describing heterogeneous UAV swarm from a functional perspective is insufficient. Differences in dynamic constraints and energy consumption models create challenges for accurately characterizing the path planning problem of heterogeneous UAV swarm. To supplement the above deficiencies, this article designs the scenario and composition structure of heterogeneous UAV swarm. The path-planning problem of heterogeneous UAV swarm is modeled as a multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem, in which a comprehensive energy consumption objective is constructed. To better balance multiple objectives and obtain high-quality solutions, a MOO evolutionary algorithm based on heterogeneous UAV swarm, namely HMOEA, is proposed. Specifically, HMOEA is implemented by combining the proposed two strategies. To verify the model’s feasibility and the algorithm’s effectiveness, numerical simulations and prototype simulations are provided. In numerical simulations, the proposed algorithm was compared with various advanced algorithms, i.e., NSGA-II, CIACO, AP-GWO, CL-DMSPSO, and DSNSGA-III, in two designed terrain problems. The results demonstrate that HMOEA not only outperforms the compared algorithms on convergence and diversity indicators increased over 4% and 2% respectively. Normal flight results were achieved in the two scenarios served by the prototype simulation, namely, urban buildings and forest scenes. Specific implementation and application can be achieved in military or civilian scenarios like reconnaissance and strike missions, search and rescue missions. The proposed model can adapt to more task scenarios, and the proposed method can provide faster and higher quality results for heterogeneous UAV swarm routes. In actual deployment, adjusting model parameters and optimizing the computing environment according to application requirements are worth further investigation to achieve optimal effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于两种平衡机制的异构无人机群路径规划多目标进化算法
无人机(UAV)群路径规划包括基于任务需求创建有效路线,以实现协同飞行。与同构无人机群相比,异构无人机群的应用场景越来越广泛。它们可以充分发挥无人机的各种能力,并显示出更高的经济效益。现有的研究主要集中在同质无人机群上,从功能角度统一描述异构无人机群的模型不足。动态约束和能量消耗模型的差异为准确表征异构无人机群的路径规划问题带来了挑战。针对上述不足,本文设计了异构无人机群的场景和组成结构。将异构无人机群的路径规划问题建模为多目标优化问题,构建了综合能耗目标。为了更好地平衡多个目标,获得高质量的解,提出了一种基于异构无人机群的MOO进化算法——HMOEA。具体而言,HMOEA是通过结合上述两种策略来实现的。为了验证模型的可行性和算法的有效性,给出了数值仿真和原型仿真。在数值模拟中,将该算法与NSGA-II、CIACO、AP-GWO、CL-DMSPSO、DSNSGA-III等先进算法在两个地形设计问题上进行了比较。结果表明,HMOEA算法不仅在收敛性和多样性指标上均优于对比算法,分别提高了4%和2%以上。在原型仿真服务的两种场景下,即城市建筑和森林场景,均获得了正常的飞行结果。具体的实施和应用可以在军事或民用场景中实现,如侦察和打击任务,搜索和救援任务。该模型可以适应更多的任务场景,并且该方法可以为异构无人机群路线提供更快、更高质量的结果。在实际部署中,根据应用需求调整模型参数和优化计算环境,以达到最优效果,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Soft Computing
Applied Soft Computing 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
874
审稿时长
10.9 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soft Computing is an international journal promoting an integrated view of soft computing to solve real life problems.The focus is to publish the highest quality research in application and convergence of the areas of Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks, Evolutionary Computing, Rough Sets and other similar techniques to address real world complexities. Applied Soft Computing is a rolling publication: articles are published as soon as the editor-in-chief has accepted them. Therefore, the web site will continuously be updated with new articles and the publication time will be short.
期刊最新文献
Few-shot classification via mix-pooling module and class-wise relationship graph similarity preserving Boosting feature distillation for link prediction via graph neural architecture search Anomaly detection of UAV flight data based on spatiotemporal feature fusion A mechanism-guided multimodal industrial copilot with incremental learning for natural products manufacturing H-Net: A transformer based multistage fusion convolutional neural network for underwater object detection in complex environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1