Negotiating Infrastructural Injustice in Poverty Alleviation Resettlement: The Case of the Southern Shaanxi Migration Project in China

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Population Space and Place Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1002/psp.70006
Yangyang Li, Zhongzhi He, Xin (Cathy) Jin, Zhenbin Zhao, Xiaoyong Li, Jian Zhang, Yang Gao
{"title":"Negotiating Infrastructural Injustice in Poverty Alleviation Resettlement: The Case of the Southern Shaanxi Migration Project in China","authors":"Yangyang Li,&nbsp;Zhongzhi He,&nbsp;Xin (Cathy) Jin,&nbsp;Zhenbin Zhao,&nbsp;Xiaoyong Li,&nbsp;Jian Zhang,&nbsp;Yang Gao","doi":"10.1002/psp.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study responds to recent calls in migration research for a thorough investigation of infrastructural injustice in non-Western contexts. Using the southern Shaanxi migration project as a case study, the largest state-led population relocation project since the foundation of the People's Republic of China, we highlight three main findings. First, while the project has successfully contributed to ecological restoration and poverty alleviation, it has inadvertently created a passive form of migration infrastructural injustice, resulting in structural fragmentation of migrant families, dysfunctional family dynamics, and unequal intergenerational relationships. Second, although middle-aged and older-adult migrants and female migrants are the most vulnerable to infrastructural injustice, they demonstrate infrastructural agency by negotiating and responding to injustices through relational and collectivist approaches. Third, Confucian ethics function as a unique mediator, simultaneously complicit in infrastructural injustice yet capable of mitigating its effects by regulating and reshaping the nature of infrastructure. Finally, we call for situating infrastructural injustice within different cultural paradigms to demonstrate subjective responses that may contradict objective perceptions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study responds to recent calls in migration research for a thorough investigation of infrastructural injustice in non-Western contexts. Using the southern Shaanxi migration project as a case study, the largest state-led population relocation project since the foundation of the People's Republic of China, we highlight three main findings. First, while the project has successfully contributed to ecological restoration and poverty alleviation, it has inadvertently created a passive form of migration infrastructural injustice, resulting in structural fragmentation of migrant families, dysfunctional family dynamics, and unequal intergenerational relationships. Second, although middle-aged and older-adult migrants and female migrants are the most vulnerable to infrastructural injustice, they demonstrate infrastructural agency by negotiating and responding to injustices through relational and collectivist approaches. Third, Confucian ethics function as a unique mediator, simultaneously complicit in infrastructural injustice yet capable of mitigating its effects by regulating and reshaping the nature of infrastructure. Finally, we call for situating infrastructural injustice within different cultural paradigms to demonstrate subjective responses that may contradict objective perceptions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扶贫安置中基础设施不公平的协商——以陕南移民项目为例
这项研究回应了最近移民研究中对非西方背景下基础设施不公正的彻底调查的呼吁。本文以新中国成立以来国家主导的最大规模人口迁移项目——陕南移民项目为例,重点分析了三个主要发现。首先,虽然该项目成功地促进了生态恢复和扶贫,但它无意中造成了一种被动的移民基础设施不公正,导致移民家庭的结构性分裂、家庭动态失调和代际关系不平等。第二,尽管中年和老年移民和女性移民最容易受到基础设施不公正的影响,但他们通过关系和集体主义的方式谈判和应对不公正,表现出基础设施的能力性。第三,儒家伦理作为一种独特的调解人,同时参与基础设施的不公正,但能够通过调节和重塑基础设施的性质来减轻其影响。最后,我们呼吁将基础设施的不公正置于不同的文化范式中,以展示可能与客观看法相矛盾的主观反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research
期刊最新文献
Self‐Reported Motives for Immobility or Constraints to Moving: A Review and Assessment of Ten Survey Measures It's All About the Age: Tracing Inequality, Segregation, and Polarization Among Younger, Midlife, and Older Persons in Greater Gothenburg, Sweden, Over Three Decades Traversing Terrains of Proximities and Place Attachment in Forced Migrants' Lives in Finland Stability and Changes in Social Network Profiles After Widowhood and Their Implications for Depressive Symptoms Among Older Adults in South Korea Refugee Camps as Contested Gendered Spaces: Afghan Women's Liminality, Inequality, and Agency in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1