Estimating the Future With the Sustainability Assessment Methodology to Soil-Associated Agricultural Experiments

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Land Degradation & Development Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1002/ldr.5551
Oscar Iván Monsalve Camacho, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Andrea Onelia Rodríguez-Roa, Oscar Gonzalo Castillo-Romero
{"title":"Estimating the Future With the Sustainability Assessment Methodology to Soil-Associated Agricultural Experiments","authors":"Oscar Iván Monsalve Camacho,&nbsp;Gerrit Hoogenboom,&nbsp;Andrea Onelia Rodríguez-Roa,&nbsp;Oscar Gonzalo Castillo-Romero","doi":"10.1002/ldr.5551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Agricultural sustainability assessments have gained high importance during the last decades. Different tools have been developed for these assessments, such as the Sustainability assessment methodology oriented to soil-associated agricultural experiments (SMAES). SMAES quantifies the current sustainability of the different treatments evaluated in experiments associated with the soil. However, efforts aimed at maintaining or increasing crop systems sustainability must be planned and measured in the short, medium, and long term. In this work, crop modelling parameters are added to SMAES to estimate future sustainability. The first is the construction of climate scenarios (RCP 4.5 and 8.5, model CCSM4, periods 2050–2100) to establish the conditions of change in the future. Second, crop yield is modelled with Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) using the aforementioned climate scenarios. Third, yield modelling results and SMAES sustainability indexes (IS) from climate scenarios are integrated. As a case study, the current sustainability (IS-C) of five potato fertilization split treatments was initially estimated: (i) Commercial control (Control), (ii) Fertilization recommended by Agrosavia (As), (iii) Monthly split fertilization recommended by Agrosavia (AsSplit), (iv) AsSplit decreasing the amount of fertilizer by 25% (AsSp25), and (v) AsSplit decreasing the amount of fertilizer by 50% (AsSp50). AsSp50 generated the highest current and future sustainability with IS-C = 0.90, IS-45, and IS-85 = 0.88. Results suggest that SMAES allows sustainability assessments under current and future scenarios, leveraging modelling tools like DSSAT and LCA. This study demonstrated its feasibility for scenario-based evaluations, highlighting its potential to support sustainable agricultural practices.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"36 9","pages":"3063-3080"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.5551","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural sustainability assessments have gained high importance during the last decades. Different tools have been developed for these assessments, such as the Sustainability assessment methodology oriented to soil-associated agricultural experiments (SMAES). SMAES quantifies the current sustainability of the different treatments evaluated in experiments associated with the soil. However, efforts aimed at maintaining or increasing crop systems sustainability must be planned and measured in the short, medium, and long term. In this work, crop modelling parameters are added to SMAES to estimate future sustainability. The first is the construction of climate scenarios (RCP 4.5 and 8.5, model CCSM4, periods 2050–2100) to establish the conditions of change in the future. Second, crop yield is modelled with Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) using the aforementioned climate scenarios. Third, yield modelling results and SMAES sustainability indexes (IS) from climate scenarios are integrated. As a case study, the current sustainability (IS-C) of five potato fertilization split treatments was initially estimated: (i) Commercial control (Control), (ii) Fertilization recommended by Agrosavia (As), (iii) Monthly split fertilization recommended by Agrosavia (AsSplit), (iv) AsSplit decreasing the amount of fertilizer by 25% (AsSp25), and (v) AsSplit decreasing the amount of fertilizer by 50% (AsSp50). AsSp50 generated the highest current and future sustainability with IS-C = 0.90, IS-45, and IS-85 = 0.88. Results suggest that SMAES allows sustainability assessments under current and future scenarios, leveraging modelling tools like DSSAT and LCA. This study demonstrated its feasibility for scenario-based evaluations, highlighting its potential to support sustainable agricultural practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于可持续性评价方法的未来土壤农业试验研究
农业可持续性评估在过去几十年中变得非常重要。已经为这些评估开发了不同的工具,例如面向土壤相关农业试验的可持续性评估方法。SMAES量化了与土壤相关的实验中评估的不同处理的当前可持续性。然而,旨在维持或提高作物系统可持续性的努力必须在短期、中期和长期进行规划和衡量。在这项工作中,作物建模参数被添加到SMAES中,以估计未来的可持续性。首先是构建气候情景(RCP 4.5和8.5,模式CCSM4,期为2050-2100),以确定未来的变化条件。其次,采用上述气候情景,利用农业技术转让决策支持系统(DSSAT)对作物产量进行建模。第三,将气候情景下的产量模拟结果与中小企业可持续性指数(IS)相结合。作为案例研究,初步估算了5种马铃薯施肥分施处理的当前可持续性(IS-C):(i)商业控制(control), (ii) Agrosavia推荐施肥(As), (iii) Agrosavia推荐每月分施施肥(AsSplit), (iv) AsSplit减少25%的施肥量(AsSp25), (v) AsSplit减少50%的施肥量(AsSp50)。AsSp50的当前和未来可持续性最高,IS-C = 0.90, IS-45, IS-85 = 0.88。结果表明,SMAES可以利用DSSAT和LCA等建模工具,在当前和未来情景下进行可持续性评估。该研究证明了基于情景的评估的可行性,强调了其支持可持续农业实践的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
期刊最新文献
Economic Trade‐Offs and Asset Gains: Assessing the Household‐Level Impact of Eucalyptus Planting in Rural Ethiopia Effects of Organic Fertilizer Substitution on Soil Carbon Loss and Sedimentary Carbon Fractions Winegrowers' Perceptions and Adoption of Sustainable Soil Management Practices and Technologies: A Case Study in Piedmont, Italy Carbon Neutrality Pathways Through Ecological Restoration: Synergies Between Climate Change Mitigation and Degradation Control Multiscale Analysis of Ecosystem Services Interactions and Driving Factors in the Anning River Basin: Implications for Ecological Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1