Mapping the global co-location potential of offshore wind energy and aquaculture production

IF 5.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Ocean & Coastal Management Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107605
Jackson Stockbridge , Christopher J. Brown , Caitlin D. Kuempel
{"title":"Mapping the global co-location potential of offshore wind energy and aquaculture production","authors":"Jackson Stockbridge ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Brown ,&nbsp;Caitlin D. Kuempel","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Co-location of offshore industries has potential to mitigate the growing congestion in the oceans and support the use of ocean resources for ecologically sustainable economic growth and improved livelihoods (i.e., the blue economy). Despite the benefits, questions remain over the feasibility of co-location due to regulatory and financial risk concerns. Here, we combine existing data on aquaculture production potential and wind energy production potential to map co-location potential for offshore wind and aquaculture (finfish, bivalve, and seaweed) globally. We then incorporate an existing index of each country's blue economy development capacity to assess areas with the greatest opportunity for co-location. Finally, we assess co-location potential in the Bass Strait, Australia to show how our approach can inform regional-level planning. We found potential for co-location across 395,042 km<sup>2</sup> of Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) globally for bivalves, 1,337,874 km<sup>2</sup> for finfish, and 1,143,643 km<sup>2</sup> for seaweed across 97 countries. Argentina, Australia, and Russia had the largest potential area for co-location, while Uruguay, Lithuania, and Belgium had the largest proportion of their EEZ. Denmark, Canada, and Finland had the largest proportion of potential area for co-location and highest capacity for blue economy development, signifying potential opportunities to be leaders in co-location implementation. Finally, the Bass Strait had high co-location potential for offshore wind and finfish aquaculture, but less for seaweed and bivalve production. Our research provides a high-level assessment of co-location across scales that can be used to streamline planning efforts, capitalise on potential opportunities, reduce risks, and facilitate blue economic growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 107605"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125000675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-location of offshore industries has potential to mitigate the growing congestion in the oceans and support the use of ocean resources for ecologically sustainable economic growth and improved livelihoods (i.e., the blue economy). Despite the benefits, questions remain over the feasibility of co-location due to regulatory and financial risk concerns. Here, we combine existing data on aquaculture production potential and wind energy production potential to map co-location potential for offshore wind and aquaculture (finfish, bivalve, and seaweed) globally. We then incorporate an existing index of each country's blue economy development capacity to assess areas with the greatest opportunity for co-location. Finally, we assess co-location potential in the Bass Strait, Australia to show how our approach can inform regional-level planning. We found potential for co-location across 395,042 km2 of Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) globally for bivalves, 1,337,874 km2 for finfish, and 1,143,643 km2 for seaweed across 97 countries. Argentina, Australia, and Russia had the largest potential area for co-location, while Uruguay, Lithuania, and Belgium had the largest proportion of their EEZ. Denmark, Canada, and Finland had the largest proportion of potential area for co-location and highest capacity for blue economy development, signifying potential opportunities to be leaders in co-location implementation. Finally, the Bass Strait had high co-location potential for offshore wind and finfish aquaculture, but less for seaweed and bivalve production. Our research provides a high-level assessment of co-location across scales that can be used to streamline planning efforts, capitalise on potential opportunities, reduce risks, and facilitate blue economic growth.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制海上风能和水产养殖生产的全球同地潜力图
近海工业的共同选址有可能缓解海洋日益拥挤的状况,并支持利用海洋资源促进生态上可持续的经济增长和改善生计(即蓝色经济)。尽管有这些好处,但由于监管和财务风险方面的担忧,对共址的可行性仍存在疑问。在这里,我们结合现有的水产养殖生产潜力和风能生产潜力数据,绘制了全球海上风能和水产养殖(鳍鱼、双壳类和海藻)的共生潜力图。然后,我们结合每个国家蓝色经济发展能力的现有指数来评估共同选址机会最大的地区。最后,我们评估了澳大利亚巴斯海峡的共址潜力,以展示我们的方法如何为区域级规划提供信息。我们发现,在全球97个国家中,双壳类、鳍类和海藻的专属经济区共分布潜力分别为395,042平方公里、1,337,874平方公里和1,143,643平方公里。阿根廷、澳大利亚和俄罗斯拥有最大的潜在区域,而乌拉圭、立陶宛和比利时拥有最大比例的专属经济区。丹麦、加拿大和芬兰具有最大的共址潜力面积比例和最高的蓝色经济发展能力,这意味着它们有可能成为共址实施的领导者。最后,巴斯海峡对海上风能和鱼类养殖具有较高的共地潜力,但对海藻和双壳类动物生产的共地潜力较小。我们的研究为跨尺度的共址提供了高水平的评估,可用于简化规划工作、利用潜在机会、降低风险和促进蓝色经济增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
A call to standardize metrics for monitoring baleen whales near marine construction activities Policy tool structures and innovation network evolution in China's marine ranching governance Lack of social cohesion as a barrier to effective governance in artisanal fishing communities of the southeastern Gulf of Mexico Characteristics and influencing factors of the carbon emission efficiency association network of China's marine fishery industry Evaluating sustainable coastal management strategies following Spartina alterniflora eradication: Insights from typhoon-induced hydro-sedimentary responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1