Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on travel mode choices and predicting the modal shift after the pandemic

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101019
Sanjeev Bista , Benoit Thierry , Rodrigo Victoriano-Habit , Ahmed El-Geneidy , Yan Kestens
{"title":"Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on travel mode choices and predicting the modal shift after the pandemic","authors":"Sanjeev Bista ,&nbsp;Benoit Thierry ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Victoriano-Habit ,&nbsp;Ahmed El-Geneidy ,&nbsp;Yan Kestens","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the measures taken by authorities to contain the virus and the fear of being infected resulted in reduced human mobility. Even though studies have made an effort to understand the changes in human mobility patterns resulted due to the pandemic, their findings are inconclusive for totally relying on aggregated data collected at ridership level rather than information at the individual-level. Our study uses four waves of travel survey data collected before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, in Montreal, to assess the determinants of mode choice and to analyse changes in travel behavior and mode choices. We had 2933 work-related trips from 1275 participants, of which only 290 participants responding in both wave 1 and wave 4 qualified for the mode prediction analysis. We applied a multinominal multilevel analysis to explore predictors of travel behaviour, and a classical multinominal model to analyse mode choice change. Our study’s findings show a huge decline in public transit use during COVID-19 and that it gradually increased after COVID-19, even though it was not comparable to the pre-pandemic level. The odds of public transit users shifting back to public transit after the pandemic was 22.54 (95%CI: 7.29, 69.66) times higher than choosing private motorized vehicles, while the rebound of active transport users was relatively higher (OR: 52.71, 95%CI: 8.68, 320.20). Our study implies that not all the sustainable mode users have returned to using the modes after COVID-19, and it stands as a challenge for transport authorities to develop appropriate strategies to encourage them to rebound.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 101019"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25000377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the measures taken by authorities to contain the virus and the fear of being infected resulted in reduced human mobility. Even though studies have made an effort to understand the changes in human mobility patterns resulted due to the pandemic, their findings are inconclusive for totally relying on aggregated data collected at ridership level rather than information at the individual-level. Our study uses four waves of travel survey data collected before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, in Montreal, to assess the determinants of mode choice and to analyse changes in travel behavior and mode choices. We had 2933 work-related trips from 1275 participants, of which only 290 participants responding in both wave 1 and wave 4 qualified for the mode prediction analysis. We applied a multinominal multilevel analysis to explore predictors of travel behaviour, and a classical multinominal model to analyse mode choice change. Our study’s findings show a huge decline in public transit use during COVID-19 and that it gradually increased after COVID-19, even though it was not comparable to the pre-pandemic level. The odds of public transit users shifting back to public transit after the pandemic was 22.54 (95%CI: 7.29, 69.66) times higher than choosing private motorized vehicles, while the rebound of active transport users was relatively higher (OR: 52.71, 95%CI: 8.68, 320.20). Our study implies that not all the sustainable mode users have returned to using the modes after COVID-19, and it stands as a challenge for transport authorities to develop appropriate strategies to encourage them to rebound.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on travel mode choices and predicting the modal shift after the pandemic Exploring the interaction between perceived risk and travel flexibility in daily mobility change: Evidence from Hong Kong’s COVID-19 pandemic Unveiling the retardant effectiveness of node-based driving restriction policies in mitigating congestion Car ownership through the parenting journey and beyond Built environment effects on dockless bikesharing–metro integration: A spatial nonlinear analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1