{"title":"Machine learning prediction for lung dose in locally advanced esophageal cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy.","authors":"Shogo Kurokawa, Hiroyuki Okamoto, Tetsu Nakaichi, Shohei Mikasa, Satoshi Nakamura, Kotaro Iijima, Takahito Chiba, Hiroki Nakayama, Tairo Kashihara, Koji Inaba, Hiroshi Igaki","doi":"10.1016/j.meddos.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We developed machine learning (ML) models for predicting lung dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics [V<sub>5</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, V<sub>20</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, and mean lung dose (MLD)] in locally advanced esophageal cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy and assessed the prediction accuracy of the models. Four ML models (linear regression, support vector machine, decision tree, and ensemble) were built with fivefold cross-validation of the predicted lung DVH metrics using a developed program by MATLAB R2022a. Eight explanatory variables were employed: gender, with/without simultaneous integrated boost and jaw tracking, age, height, weight, the ratio of the total irradiation angle to the total rotation angle of the gantry, and the ratio of the longitudinal length of the planning target volume overlapped with the whole lung to the length of the whole lung. To evaluate the prediction accuracy of the ML models, the differences and the Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between the predicted and planned doses were calculated. The mean ± standard deviation values of the planned lung doses of V<sub>5</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, V<sub>20</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, and MLD were 34.9 ± 15.2%, 11.9 ± 6.7%, and 7.2 ± 3.3 Gy, respectively. The differences for all models were -0.1 ± 8.0% (V<sub>5</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>,), 0.1 ± 4.2% (V<sub>20</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>), and -0.2 ± 1.7 Gy (MLD). The predicted lung doses were consistent with the clinically planned doses (V<sub>5</sub> <sub>Gy</sub> [r = 0.7-0.8], V<sub>20</sub> <sub>Gy</sub> [r = 0.6-0.8], and MLD [r = 0.7-0.9]), and there was no significant difference in the prediction accuracy among the ML models. These models can promptly evaluate and improve the quality of treatment plans by aiding patient-specific decision-making regarding lung-dose reduction before treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49837,"journal":{"name":"Medical Dosimetry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2025.02.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We developed machine learning (ML) models for predicting lung dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics [V5Gy, V20Gy, and mean lung dose (MLD)] in locally advanced esophageal cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy and assessed the prediction accuracy of the models. Four ML models (linear regression, support vector machine, decision tree, and ensemble) were built with fivefold cross-validation of the predicted lung DVH metrics using a developed program by MATLAB R2022a. Eight explanatory variables were employed: gender, with/without simultaneous integrated boost and jaw tracking, age, height, weight, the ratio of the total irradiation angle to the total rotation angle of the gantry, and the ratio of the longitudinal length of the planning target volume overlapped with the whole lung to the length of the whole lung. To evaluate the prediction accuracy of the ML models, the differences and the Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between the predicted and planned doses were calculated. The mean ± standard deviation values of the planned lung doses of V5Gy, V20Gy, and MLD were 34.9 ± 15.2%, 11.9 ± 6.7%, and 7.2 ± 3.3 Gy, respectively. The differences for all models were -0.1 ± 8.0% (V5Gy,), 0.1 ± 4.2% (V20Gy), and -0.2 ± 1.7 Gy (MLD). The predicted lung doses were consistent with the clinically planned doses (V5Gy [r = 0.7-0.8], V20Gy [r = 0.6-0.8], and MLD [r = 0.7-0.9]), and there was no significant difference in the prediction accuracy among the ML models. These models can promptly evaluate and improve the quality of treatment plans by aiding patient-specific decision-making regarding lung-dose reduction before treatment planning.
期刊介绍:
Medical Dosimetry, the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field.