Machine learning prediction for lung dose in locally advanced esophageal cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Medical Dosimetry Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2025.02.001
Shogo Kurokawa, Hiroyuki Okamoto, Tetsu Nakaichi, Shohei Mikasa, Satoshi Nakamura, Kotaro Iijima, Takahito Chiba, Hiroki Nakayama, Tairo Kashihara, Koji Inaba, Hiroshi Igaki
{"title":"Machine learning prediction for lung dose in locally advanced esophageal cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy.","authors":"Shogo Kurokawa, Hiroyuki Okamoto, Tetsu Nakaichi, Shohei Mikasa, Satoshi Nakamura, Kotaro Iijima, Takahito Chiba, Hiroki Nakayama, Tairo Kashihara, Koji Inaba, Hiroshi Igaki","doi":"10.1016/j.meddos.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We developed machine learning (ML) models for predicting lung dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics [V<sub>5</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, V<sub>20</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, and mean lung dose (MLD)] in locally advanced esophageal cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy and assessed the prediction accuracy of the models. Four ML models (linear regression, support vector machine, decision tree, and ensemble) were built with fivefold cross-validation of the predicted lung DVH metrics using a developed program by MATLAB R2022a. Eight explanatory variables were employed: gender, with/without simultaneous integrated boost and jaw tracking, age, height, weight, the ratio of the total irradiation angle to the total rotation angle of the gantry, and the ratio of the longitudinal length of the planning target volume overlapped with the whole lung to the length of the whole lung. To evaluate the prediction accuracy of the ML models, the differences and the Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between the predicted and planned doses were calculated. The mean ± standard deviation values of the planned lung doses of V<sub>5</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, V<sub>20</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, and MLD were 34.9 ± 15.2%, 11.9 ± 6.7%, and 7.2 ± 3.3 Gy, respectively. The differences for all models were -0.1 ± 8.0% (V<sub>5</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>,), 0.1 ± 4.2% (V<sub>20</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>), and -0.2 ± 1.7 Gy (MLD). The predicted lung doses were consistent with the clinically planned doses (V<sub>5</sub> <sub>Gy</sub> [r = 0.7-0.8], V<sub>20</sub> <sub>Gy</sub> [r = 0.6-0.8], and MLD [r = 0.7-0.9]), and there was no significant difference in the prediction accuracy among the ML models. These models can promptly evaluate and improve the quality of treatment plans by aiding patient-specific decision-making regarding lung-dose reduction before treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49837,"journal":{"name":"Medical Dosimetry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2025.02.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We developed machine learning (ML) models for predicting lung dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics [V5Gy, V20Gy, and mean lung dose (MLD)] in locally advanced esophageal cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy and assessed the prediction accuracy of the models. Four ML models (linear regression, support vector machine, decision tree, and ensemble) were built with fivefold cross-validation of the predicted lung DVH metrics using a developed program by MATLAB R2022a. Eight explanatory variables were employed: gender, with/without simultaneous integrated boost and jaw tracking, age, height, weight, the ratio of the total irradiation angle to the total rotation angle of the gantry, and the ratio of the longitudinal length of the planning target volume overlapped with the whole lung to the length of the whole lung. To evaluate the prediction accuracy of the ML models, the differences and the Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between the predicted and planned doses were calculated. The mean ± standard deviation values of the planned lung doses of V5Gy, V20Gy, and MLD were 34.9 ± 15.2%, 11.9 ± 6.7%, and 7.2 ± 3.3 Gy, respectively. The differences for all models were -0.1 ± 8.0% (V5Gy,), 0.1 ± 4.2% (V20Gy), and -0.2 ± 1.7 Gy (MLD). The predicted lung doses were consistent with the clinically planned doses (V5Gy [r = 0.7-0.8], V20Gy [r = 0.6-0.8], and MLD [r = 0.7-0.9]), and there was no significant difference in the prediction accuracy among the ML models. These models can promptly evaluate and improve the quality of treatment plans by aiding patient-specific decision-making regarding lung-dose reduction before treatment planning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Dosimetry
Medical Dosimetry 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Medical Dosimetry, the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning prediction for lung dose in locally advanced esophageal cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Quality assessment of automatically planned o-ring linac SBRT plans for pelvic lymph node and lung metastases, evaluating the optimal minimum target size. Dosimetric comparison of HyperArc, conventional noncoplanar VMAT, and Halcyon-based coplanar VMAT in hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy. Assessing proton plans with 3 different beam lines vs photon plans for early-stage lung cancer. Assessment of automated non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery planning in single isocenteric linac-based treatment for brain metastases with respect to planner's experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1