Comparative experimental study on inhibition of methane explosion by ultra-fine water mist containing different additives

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105607
Zeyu Zhang, Ke Yang, Xiaoyang Du, Dongyu Ji, Hong Ji, Juncheng Jiang
{"title":"Comparative experimental study on inhibition of methane explosion by ultra-fine water mist containing different additives","authors":"Zeyu Zhang,&nbsp;Ke Yang,&nbsp;Xiaoyang Du,&nbsp;Dongyu Ji,&nbsp;Hong Ji,&nbsp;Juncheng Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study utilized a 2.5L visual pipeline experiment platform to investigate the inhibitory effect of ultra-fine water mist containing different additives on methane explosion. It provides a more comprehensive experimental foundation for the subsequent research on methane explosion suppression. The experiment analyzed the particle size parameters of ultra-fine water mist and the effect of different additives on the inhibition of pipeline methane explosion. The results showed that the explosion overpressure of ultra-fine water mist containing KBr, FeCl2, and PPFBS was significantly lower than that of pure methane and pure water ultra-fine water mist with the same amount of spray. The best inhibition effect was observed with 5% KBr, 0.82% FeCl2, and 0.07% PPFBS. Compared to 5 mL pure water mist, the explosion overpressure decreased by 19.49%, 16.87%, and 46.3%, and the flame propagation speed decreased by 18.7%, 15.55%, and 41.65%, respectively. It is proved that the listed additives have different degrees of inhibiting effects on methane explosion. The composite additive ultra-fine water mist had a greater effect on temperature and reacted with a large number of free radicals such as H and O, which hindered the chain reaction in the process of methane combustion most obviously. The four additives have the best explosion suppression effect: compound additive, PPFBS, KBr, and FeCL2. The main mechanism of the effect of different inorganic salt additives is that the ultra-fine water mist cools the reaction zone's temperature, and affects the gas's volume ratio after dilution and vaporization, and some evaporated crystals also play the role of attenuating heat radiation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 105607"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025000658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study utilized a 2.5L visual pipeline experiment platform to investigate the inhibitory effect of ultra-fine water mist containing different additives on methane explosion. It provides a more comprehensive experimental foundation for the subsequent research on methane explosion suppression. The experiment analyzed the particle size parameters of ultra-fine water mist and the effect of different additives on the inhibition of pipeline methane explosion. The results showed that the explosion overpressure of ultra-fine water mist containing KBr, FeCl2, and PPFBS was significantly lower than that of pure methane and pure water ultra-fine water mist with the same amount of spray. The best inhibition effect was observed with 5% KBr, 0.82% FeCl2, and 0.07% PPFBS. Compared to 5 mL pure water mist, the explosion overpressure decreased by 19.49%, 16.87%, and 46.3%, and the flame propagation speed decreased by 18.7%, 15.55%, and 41.65%, respectively. It is proved that the listed additives have different degrees of inhibiting effects on methane explosion. The composite additive ultra-fine water mist had a greater effect on temperature and reacted with a large number of free radicals such as H and O, which hindered the chain reaction in the process of methane combustion most obviously. The four additives have the best explosion suppression effect: compound additive, PPFBS, KBr, and FeCL2. The main mechanism of the effect of different inorganic salt additives is that the ultra-fine water mist cools the reaction zone's temperature, and affects the gas's volume ratio after dilution and vaporization, and some evaporated crystals also play the role of attenuating heat radiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
期刊最新文献
The effect of favorable conditions within chemical process units on vapour cloud explosion overpressures Comparative experimental study on inhibition of methane explosion by ultra-fine water mist containing different additives Systems Thinking for explosion safety management Research on leakage control of river oil and gas pipelines based on accident situation evolution model Investigation on the deflagration inhibition effects of potassium salt-modified dry water on CH4/air mixture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1