Comparison of the effects of medication error encouragement training and low-fidelity simulation on the medication safety competence and knowledge of nursing students: A quasi-experimental study

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106676
Amir Shahzeydi , Sedigheh Farzi , Meysam Rezazadeh , Mohammad Javad Tarrahi , Saba Farzi , Seyyed Abbas Hosseini
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of medication error encouragement training and low-fidelity simulation on the medication safety competence and knowledge of nursing students: A quasi-experimental study","authors":"Amir Shahzeydi ,&nbsp;Sedigheh Farzi ,&nbsp;Meysam Rezazadeh ,&nbsp;Mohammad Javad Tarrahi ,&nbsp;Saba Farzi ,&nbsp;Seyyed Abbas Hosseini","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Medication safety is a key indicator of healthcare quality and an essential component of patient safety. Medication errors threaten medication safety, causing harm to patients and leading to psychological and financial consequences for both patients and healthcare providers. There has been a significant increase in medication errors among nursing students. Among the main causes of medication errors are insufficient education, which leads to a lack of knowledge and competency in safe medication administration. Medication error encouragement training and low-fidelity simulation are among the new educational methods in the field of safe medication administration training. This study aimed to compare the effects of two methods—medication error encouragement training and low-fidelity simulation—on the knowledge and competency of medication safety among nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study is a quasi-experimental, two blinded, two-group design conducted in 2023. Sixty-four third-year nursing students were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to control and intervention groups. The students' medication safety knowledge was assessed through self-report, and their medication safety competence was evaluated using a scenario as a pretest. Subsequently, one group underwent medication error encouragement training, while the other group experienced low-fidelity simulation. Afterward, the participants' medication safety competence was assessed post-intervention using a different scenario from the pretest, with their performance observed and their medication safety knowledge score self-reported. Data collection was done through the Medication Safety Critical Element Checklist and Medication Safety Knowledge Assessment. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 16, with a significance level set at 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The independent sample <em>t</em>-test revealed no significant difference between the knowledge and medication safety competence scores of the two groups before the intervention (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The paired sample t-test indicated a significant increase in the scores of knowledge and medication safety competence for both groups after the intervention (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Additionally, the MANCOVA test demonstrated a significant increase in the medication safety competence score for the medication error encouragement training group compared to the low-fidelity simulation group after the intervention (P &lt; 0.05). However, no significant difference was found in the medication safety knowledge scores between the two groups after the intervention (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study results indicate that both medication error encouragement training and low-fidelity simulation play a significant role in enhancing the knowledge and medication safety competence of nursing students. Therefore, it is recommended that nursing educators incorporate these two methods in medication safety training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 106676"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026069172500111X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Medication safety is a key indicator of healthcare quality and an essential component of patient safety. Medication errors threaten medication safety, causing harm to patients and leading to psychological and financial consequences for both patients and healthcare providers. There has been a significant increase in medication errors among nursing students. Among the main causes of medication errors are insufficient education, which leads to a lack of knowledge and competency in safe medication administration. Medication error encouragement training and low-fidelity simulation are among the new educational methods in the field of safe medication administration training. This study aimed to compare the effects of two methods—medication error encouragement training and low-fidelity simulation—on the knowledge and competency of medication safety among nursing students.

Methods

This study is a quasi-experimental, two blinded, two-group design conducted in 2023. Sixty-four third-year nursing students were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to control and intervention groups. The students' medication safety knowledge was assessed through self-report, and their medication safety competence was evaluated using a scenario as a pretest. Subsequently, one group underwent medication error encouragement training, while the other group experienced low-fidelity simulation. Afterward, the participants' medication safety competence was assessed post-intervention using a different scenario from the pretest, with their performance observed and their medication safety knowledge score self-reported. Data collection was done through the Medication Safety Critical Element Checklist and Medication Safety Knowledge Assessment. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 16, with a significance level set at 0.05.

Results

The independent sample t-test revealed no significant difference between the knowledge and medication safety competence scores of the two groups before the intervention (P > 0.05). The paired sample t-test indicated a significant increase in the scores of knowledge and medication safety competence for both groups after the intervention (P < 0.05). Additionally, the MANCOVA test demonstrated a significant increase in the medication safety competence score for the medication error encouragement training group compared to the low-fidelity simulation group after the intervention (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found in the medication safety knowledge scores between the two groups after the intervention (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The study results indicate that both medication error encouragement training and low-fidelity simulation play a significant role in enhancing the knowledge and medication safety competence of nursing students. Therefore, it is recommended that nursing educators incorporate these two methods in medication safety training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用药错误鼓励培训与低保真度模拟对护生用药安全能力与知识的影响比较:一项准实验研究
用药安全是医疗质量的关键指标,也是患者安全的重要组成部分。用药错误威胁到用药安全,对患者造成伤害,并对患者和医疗保健提供者造成心理和经济后果。护理专业学生的用药错误显著增加。用药错误的主要原因是教育不足,导致缺乏安全用药的知识和能力。用药错误鼓励培训和低保真模拟是安全用药管理培训领域的新教育方法。本研究旨在比较用药错误鼓励训练和低保真度模拟两种方法对护生用药安全知识和能力的影响。方法本研究采用准实验、双盲、双组设计,于2023年进行。采用方便抽样的方法,将64名大三护生随机分为对照组和干预组。采用自我报告法评估学生用药安全知识,采用情景预测法评估学生用药安全能力。随后,一组进行用药错误鼓励训练,另一组进行低保真模拟。随后,在干预后采用与前测不同的方案评估参与者的用药安全能力,观察他们的表现并自报用药安全知识得分。数据收集通过药物安全关键要素清单和药物安全知识评估完成。数据分析采用SPSS version 16,显著性水平设为0.05。结果独立样本t检验显示,干预前两组患者的知识和用药安全能力得分差异无统计学意义(P >;0.05)。配对样本t检验显示,干预后两组患者的知识和用药安全能力得分均显著提高(P <;0.05)。此外,MANCOVA测试显示,干预后,与低保真度模拟组相比,用药错误鼓励训练组的用药安全能力得分显著增加(P <;0.05)。干预后两组患者用药安全知识得分差异无统计学意义(P >;0.05)。结论用药错误鼓励培训和低保真模拟对提高护生用药安全知识和用药安全能力均有显著作用。因此,建议护理教育者将这两种方法纳入用药安全培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Clinical training challenges in critical care units for nursing students: A qualitative content analysis. Treatment fidelity in nursing education research: Striking a balance between rigor and real-world relevance as a contemporary challenge. Metaverse in healthcare education: A scoping review of definitions and challenges. Reorienting nursing education toward a culture of self-care: Nursing students' experiences of nurse self-care integration-A qualitative systematic review. AI literacy, information cocoons, and creativity in healthcare postgraduate education: A latent profile and mediation analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1