Calling time on low-risk drinking guidelines: An evaluation of alternative methods to communicate risks of alcohol use to consumers

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104764
Isabella Priore , Tim Stockwell , Jinhui Zhao , Sybil Goulet-Stock , Darren Kruisselbrink , Tim Naimi
{"title":"Calling time on low-risk drinking guidelines: An evaluation of alternative methods to communicate risks of alcohol use to consumers","authors":"Isabella Priore ,&nbsp;Tim Stockwell ,&nbsp;Jinhui Zhao ,&nbsp;Sybil Goulet-Stock ,&nbsp;Darren Kruisselbrink ,&nbsp;Tim Naimi","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Current epidemiological analyses suggest there is no risk-free level of alcohol consumption. Awareness remains low and consumption levels high. There is limited research on the types of alcohol warning label (AWL) messages to address this concern.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>We tested alternative AWL messages with young adults to identify effective methods of communicating Canada's 2023 Guidance on Alcohol and Health.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We recruited 332 young adults attending two Canadian universities who drank at least monthly. Participants’ knowledge of health risks from alcohol was assessed. Six AWLs were developed to communicate (a) traditional “low risk” limits, (b) alcohol's cancer risk, (c) guidelines to keep mortality risk below 1 %, (d) reduced life expectancy in minutes per drink, (e) reduced life expectancy in months or (f) a “drink less” message. AWLs were rated for impact on purchasing, clarity, discomfort and degree of annoyance caused. Mixed regression was used to analyse the rated scores all compared with a control message which recommended consumers drink responsibly. T-tests were used to test for significance between the impact ratings of the AWLs. The AWLs were also discussed by a focus group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants correctly identified liver cirrhosis (93.37 %) and pancreatitis (85.84 %) as caused by alcohol, fewer identified throat (38.25 %) or breast cancer (24.70 %). All six experimental AWLs were rated as significantly more impactful on purchasing behaviour than the control. The highest mean ratings were received for the ‘Cancer Risk’ (3.09, 95 % CIs: 2.95–3.25), the ‘5 Minutes of Life Lost per Drink’ (3.01, 95 % CIs: 2.87–3.16) and ‘Three Months of Life Lost’ (2.96, 95 % CIs: 2.82–3.11) AWLs. Traditional drinking guideline messages and a ‘1 % mortality risk’ message performed relatively poorly. These results were confirmed by qualitative analysis of the focus group discussion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Health communications, including AWLs, may be more effective if they highlight specific, tangible risks from alcohol consumption such as cancer and potential impacts on life expectancy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104764"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925000635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Current epidemiological analyses suggest there is no risk-free level of alcohol consumption. Awareness remains low and consumption levels high. There is limited research on the types of alcohol warning label (AWL) messages to address this concern.

Aims

We tested alternative AWL messages with young adults to identify effective methods of communicating Canada's 2023 Guidance on Alcohol and Health.

Methods

We recruited 332 young adults attending two Canadian universities who drank at least monthly. Participants’ knowledge of health risks from alcohol was assessed. Six AWLs were developed to communicate (a) traditional “low risk” limits, (b) alcohol's cancer risk, (c) guidelines to keep mortality risk below 1 %, (d) reduced life expectancy in minutes per drink, (e) reduced life expectancy in months or (f) a “drink less” message. AWLs were rated for impact on purchasing, clarity, discomfort and degree of annoyance caused. Mixed regression was used to analyse the rated scores all compared with a control message which recommended consumers drink responsibly. T-tests were used to test for significance between the impact ratings of the AWLs. The AWLs were also discussed by a focus group.

Results

Participants correctly identified liver cirrhosis (93.37 %) and pancreatitis (85.84 %) as caused by alcohol, fewer identified throat (38.25 %) or breast cancer (24.70 %). All six experimental AWLs were rated as significantly more impactful on purchasing behaviour than the control. The highest mean ratings were received for the ‘Cancer Risk’ (3.09, 95 % CIs: 2.95–3.25), the ‘5 Minutes of Life Lost per Drink’ (3.01, 95 % CIs: 2.87–3.16) and ‘Three Months of Life Lost’ (2.96, 95 % CIs: 2.82–3.11) AWLs. Traditional drinking guideline messages and a ‘1 % mortality risk’ message performed relatively poorly. These results were confirmed by qualitative analysis of the focus group discussion.

Conclusions

Health communications, including AWLs, may be more effective if they highlight specific, tangible risks from alcohol consumption such as cancer and potential impacts on life expectancy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吁制定低风险饮酒指南:对向消费者传达饮酒风险的替代方法的评估
背景:目前的流行病学分析表明,不存在无风险的饮酒水平。意识仍然很低,消费水平很高。关于酒精警告标签(AWL)信息类型的研究有限,无法解决这一问题。目的:我们在年轻人中测试了其他AWL信息,以确定有效的传播加拿大2023年酒精与健康指南的方法。方法:我们招募了332名在加拿大两所大学就读的年轻人,他们每月至少饮酒一次。评估了参与者对酒精健康风险的认识。制定了六个AWLs来传达(a)传统的“低风险”限制,(b)酒精的癌症风险,(c)将死亡率风险保持在1%以下的指导方针,(d)以每次饮酒为单位减少预期寿命,(e)以月为单位减少预期寿命或(f)“少喝酒”的信息。对锥子的购买影响、清晰度、不适程度和引起的烦恼程度进行了评级。混合回归用于分析评级分数,并与建议消费者负责任地饮酒的控制信息进行比较。采用t检验检验awl的冲击等级之间的显著性。焦点小组还讨论了AWLs。结果被调查者对酒精引起的肝硬化(93.37%)和胰腺炎(85.84%)有正确的认识,对咽喉癌(38.25%)和乳腺癌(24.70%)的认识较少。所有六种实验AWLs都被评为对购买行为的影响显著大于对照组。平均评分最高的是“癌症风险”(3.09,95% ci: 2.95-3.25)、“每杯酒损失5分钟生命”(3.01,95% ci: 2.87-3.16)和“损失3个月生命”(2.96,95% ci: 2.82-3.11)。传统的饮酒指南信息和“1%死亡风险”信息表现相对较差。这些结果通过焦点小组讨论的定性分析得到了证实。结论:健康宣传,包括AWLs,如果能强调饮酒带来的具体、切实的风险,如癌症和对预期寿命的潜在影响,可能会更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Direct violence as drug-related harm: Basuco and harm reduction in Bogotá, Colombia Doubts and disconnection: Police reflections on drug decriminalization in British Columbia in the first year of implementation How are bars and nightclubs in Scotland using extensions in late-night alcohol trading hours? Venue observation study When profit meets public health: private equity in methadone treatment Corrigendum to “Incidents with recreational nitrous oxide use before and after legislation: poisonings and police incidents in the Netherlands between 2020 and 2025” [International Journal of Drug Policy 149 (2026) 105170]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1