Public spheres or echo chambers? Nonprofit E-advocacy and civic engagement on harm reduction policy in the U.S.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104772
Seongho An , Daejun Park , Jihyeon Song
{"title":"Public spheres or echo chambers? Nonprofit E-advocacy and civic engagement on harm reduction policy in the U.S.","authors":"Seongho An ,&nbsp;Daejun Park ,&nbsp;Jihyeon Song","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how social media platforms shape drug policy advocacy by analyzing stakeholder engagement surrounding supervised consumption sites in New York City. While research has explored organizational use of social media for advocacy, less attention has focused on patterns of civic engagement and dialogue. Analyzing messages and comments from two opposing organizations—OnPoint NYC and Harlem East Block Association—over 24 months (2022–2023), we investigate whether social media-based drug policy advocacy creates public spheres for diverse dialogue or echo chambers of like-minded individuals. Through content and stakeholder analysis of 1,513 organizational messages and 428 user comments, we find that social media can function as a public sphere for policy discourse, though this depends on organizational approach. Evidence of substantial inter-organizational engagement suggests opportunities for coalition-building through social media advocacy. These findings enhance understanding of digital advocacy's role in policy discourse and provide insights for organizations seeking to effectively engage stakeholders through social media platforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 104772"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925000714","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how social media platforms shape drug policy advocacy by analyzing stakeholder engagement surrounding supervised consumption sites in New York City. While research has explored organizational use of social media for advocacy, less attention has focused on patterns of civic engagement and dialogue. Analyzing messages and comments from two opposing organizations—OnPoint NYC and Harlem East Block Association—over 24 months (2022–2023), we investigate whether social media-based drug policy advocacy creates public spheres for diverse dialogue or echo chambers of like-minded individuals. Through content and stakeholder analysis of 1,513 organizational messages and 428 user comments, we find that social media can function as a public sphere for policy discourse, though this depends on organizational approach. Evidence of substantial inter-organizational engagement suggests opportunities for coalition-building through social media advocacy. These findings enhance understanding of digital advocacy's role in policy discourse and provide insights for organizations seeking to effectively engage stakeholders through social media platforms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the potential of wastewater-based epidemiology to estimate the retail illicit drug market size in Europe: A case study Opioid Settlements in Canada: Avoiding U.S. Pitfalls, Embracing Best Practices Attitudes toward and experience with naloxone among people who use drugs in the Southeastern United States Public spheres or echo chambers? Nonprofit E-advocacy and civic engagement on harm reduction policy in the U.S. Calling time on low-risk drinking guidelines: An evaluation of alternative methods to communicate risks of alcohol use to consumers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1