Contextual behavioral informed nudges to stimulate waste prevention and recycling. A framework and a research agenda

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Economics Pub Date : 2025-03-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108576
Amedeo Argentiero , Massimo Cesareo , Vincenzo Fasone , Giulio Pedrini , Giovambattista Presti
{"title":"Contextual behavioral informed nudges to stimulate waste prevention and recycling. A framework and a research agenda","authors":"Amedeo Argentiero ,&nbsp;Massimo Cesareo ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Fasone ,&nbsp;Giulio Pedrini ,&nbsp;Giovambattista Presti","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Waste prevention and recycling have gained a focal position in the research agendas of scholars and policy makers. By drawing links between economics and psychology, Behavioral Economics (BE) offers a useful framework to stimulate benign individual decisions and choices in this field, by stressing the role of human factors in shaping them. Two distinct approaches can be identified, differing in how they conceptualize the putative independent variables that govern human behavior: 1) cognitive models and 2) behavioral-oriented models. The extant experimental literature, however, has not satisfactorily developed this twofold perspective in the analysis of possible nudging strategies to encourage waste prevention and recycling. Building on this research gap, the paper highlights the limitations of the current cognitive-based framework and explores the potential for extending the application of a contextual behavioral approach within this field of study. We propose a research agenda centered on integrating contextual behavioral tools into nudging interventions, identifying two main benefits arising from such an innovative approach: (i) a wider adoption of value-based actions, (ii) a mitigation of the decay of the nudging effect in the long term. These “contextual behavioral informed nudges” could be especially effective in situations involving a trade-off between health and environmental protection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 108576"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180092500059X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Waste prevention and recycling have gained a focal position in the research agendas of scholars and policy makers. By drawing links between economics and psychology, Behavioral Economics (BE) offers a useful framework to stimulate benign individual decisions and choices in this field, by stressing the role of human factors in shaping them. Two distinct approaches can be identified, differing in how they conceptualize the putative independent variables that govern human behavior: 1) cognitive models and 2) behavioral-oriented models. The extant experimental literature, however, has not satisfactorily developed this twofold perspective in the analysis of possible nudging strategies to encourage waste prevention and recycling. Building on this research gap, the paper highlights the limitations of the current cognitive-based framework and explores the potential for extending the application of a contextual behavioral approach within this field of study. We propose a research agenda centered on integrating contextual behavioral tools into nudging interventions, identifying two main benefits arising from such an innovative approach: (i) a wider adoption of value-based actions, (ii) a mitigation of the decay of the nudging effect in the long term. These “contextual behavioral informed nudges” could be especially effective in situations involving a trade-off between health and environmental protection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情境行为信息推动促进废物预防和回收。框架和研究议程
废物预防和回收利用已成为学者和决策者研究议程的重点。通过在经济学和心理学之间建立联系,行为经济学(BE)通过强调人为因素在形成决策和选择中的作用,提供了一个有用的框架来刺激这一领域中良性的个人决策和选择。可以识别出两种截然不同的方法,它们在如何概念化控制人类行为的假定独立变量方面有所不同:1)认知模型和2)行为导向模型。然而,现有的实验文献在分析可能的推动策略以鼓励废物预防和回收方面并没有令人满意地发展这种双重观点。基于这一研究差距,本文强调了当前基于认知的框架的局限性,并探讨了在这一研究领域扩展情境行为方法应用的潜力。我们提出了一项研究议程,重点是将情境行为工具整合到推动干预措施中,确定这种创新方法带来的两个主要好处:(i)更广泛地采用基于价值的行动,(ii)从长远来看,缓解推动效应的衰减。在涉及健康和环境保护之间权衡的情况下,这些“情境行为知情推动”可能特别有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
期刊最新文献
The impact of labelling “true price” on effectiveness and consumer acceptance Using carbon pricing revenues to empower low-income households with renewable energy: Distributional analysis for Tanzania How resilient is public support for carbon pricing? Longitudinal evidence from Germany Designing a reserve system with heterogeneous sites: Extending the SLOSS debate from an economic perspective Bridging beyond GDP and degrowth: Identifying measurements that are fit for future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1