{"title":"Responding with ‘really’ in Korean conversation","authors":"Stephanie Hyeri Kim , Mary Shin Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines two responses both glossed as the English newsmark <em>really</em> in Korean: 진짜 <em>cincca</em> and 진짜야 <em>cincca-ya</em>, which are among the most prevalent ways of responding to news in Korean conversational data. The structural distinction between the two forms is the attachment of copula -<em>ya</em> ‘be’ to the noun <em>cincca</em> ‘real’. At a glance, they appear interchangeable. However, a closer investigation of the sequential and interactional environments in which they emerge shows that they implement separate action formats that pursue different responses, resulting in divergent interactional trajectories. <em>Cincca-ya</em> treats the information as a matter that requires further verification from the news deliverer, thereby questioning and problematizing the validity of the informing and mobilizing confirmation and an account. In contrast, <em>cincca</em> displays that the information is new or significant in some way but does not necessarily make confirmation relevant, as the information is accepted as is. We argue that the addition of the copula transforms <em>cinnca</em>, a particle response, into a minimal clausal response, which allows the response format to carry out a distinct action. Overall, this study contributes to our understanding of how responses to informing are constructed across languages with data from Korean.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"240 ","pages":"Pages 53-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000499","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines two responses both glossed as the English newsmark really in Korean: 진짜 cincca and 진짜야 cincca-ya, which are among the most prevalent ways of responding to news in Korean conversational data. The structural distinction between the two forms is the attachment of copula -ya ‘be’ to the noun cincca ‘real’. At a glance, they appear interchangeable. However, a closer investigation of the sequential and interactional environments in which they emerge shows that they implement separate action formats that pursue different responses, resulting in divergent interactional trajectories. Cincca-ya treats the information as a matter that requires further verification from the news deliverer, thereby questioning and problematizing the validity of the informing and mobilizing confirmation and an account. In contrast, cincca displays that the information is new or significant in some way but does not necessarily make confirmation relevant, as the information is accepted as is. We argue that the addition of the copula transforms cinnca, a particle response, into a minimal clausal response, which allows the response format to carry out a distinct action. Overall, this study contributes to our understanding of how responses to informing are constructed across languages with data from Korean.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.