Low carbon consumption and cleaner aromatics production integrated coke oven gas: Process design and benefit analysis

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Pub Date : 2025-04-15 Epub Date: 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2025.135516
Junqiang Zhang , Haifeng Lei , Guizhu Zhang , Junwen Wang , Yunfei Gao , Wei Zhang , Zhitong Zhao
{"title":"Low carbon consumption and cleaner aromatics production integrated coke oven gas: Process design and benefit analysis","authors":"Junqiang Zhang ,&nbsp;Haifeng Lei ,&nbsp;Guizhu Zhang ,&nbsp;Junwen Wang ,&nbsp;Yunfei Gao ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhitong Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.135516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The coal-to-aromatics(CTA) process has a significant negative environmental impact due to the problem of high carbon emissions caused by the low hydrogen to carbon ratio. The introduction of coke oven gas to partially replace coal is a highly feasible approach to improving the process. In this study, a coke oven gas integrated coal-to-aromatics process using methane dry\\steam reforming technology was proposed and simulated. A comprehensive techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment (LCA) were also carried out to highlight the advantages of the proposed process. Findings reveal that the techno-economic performance of the COG-CTA process demonstrated significant advantages over the traditional CTA process. The results showed that the energy efficiency, hydrogen utilization, carbon utilization, and production cost of the COG-CTA process were 74.81 %, 53.27 %, 84.70 %, and 1289.19 M$, respectively. Compared with the conventional CTA process, the energy efficiency increased by 18.66 %, hydrogen utilization increased by 32.08 %, carbon utilization increased by 26.49 %, and production cost decreased by 39.39 %. The LCA results showed a decrease in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from 9.29 to 4.09 kgCO<sub>2</sub>·kg<sup>−1</sup>, as well as a 82.48 % reduction in life cycle water consumption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"321 ","pages":"Article 135516"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225011582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coal-to-aromatics(CTA) process has a significant negative environmental impact due to the problem of high carbon emissions caused by the low hydrogen to carbon ratio. The introduction of coke oven gas to partially replace coal is a highly feasible approach to improving the process. In this study, a coke oven gas integrated coal-to-aromatics process using methane dry\steam reforming technology was proposed and simulated. A comprehensive techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment (LCA) were also carried out to highlight the advantages of the proposed process. Findings reveal that the techno-economic performance of the COG-CTA process demonstrated significant advantages over the traditional CTA process. The results showed that the energy efficiency, hydrogen utilization, carbon utilization, and production cost of the COG-CTA process were 74.81 %, 53.27 %, 84.70 %, and 1289.19 M$, respectively. Compared with the conventional CTA process, the energy efficiency increased by 18.66 %, hydrogen utilization increased by 32.08 %, carbon utilization increased by 26.49 %, and production cost decreased by 39.39 %. The LCA results showed a decrease in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from 9.29 to 4.09 kgCO2·kg−1, as well as a 82.48 % reduction in life cycle water consumption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集成焦炉煤气的低碳消耗和清洁芳烃生产:工艺设计和效益分析
煤制芳烃(CTA)工艺由于其低氢碳比导致的高碳排放问题,对环境造成了显著的负面影响。引入焦炉煤气部分替代煤炭是一种非常可行的工艺改进方法。提出了一种采用甲烷干蒸汽重整技术的焦炉煤气一体化煤制芳烃工艺,并进行了仿真研究。还进行了全面的技术经济分析和生命周期评估(LCA),以突出所提议工艺的优点。结果表明,COG-CTA工艺的技术经济性能明显优于传统的CTA工艺。结果表明,COG-CTA工艺的能源效率、氢气利用率、碳利用率和生产成本分别为74.81%、53.27%、84.70%和1289.19 M$。与常规CTA工艺相比,该工艺能源效率提高了18.66%,氢气利用率提高了32.08%,碳利用率提高了26.49%,生产成本降低了39.39%。LCA结果表明,温室气体(GHG)排放量从9.29减少到4.09 kgCO2·kg−1,生命周期用水量减少82.48%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
期刊最新文献
Towards low-carbon cities with envelope-integrated photovoltaic-thermal systems: A multi-scale techno-economic appraisal Multi-criteria decision framework and capacity sizing optimization for multi-energy storage synergy schemes in regional integrated energy systems Research on building flexible load quantification method based on users’ behavior prediction and multi-timescale optimized operation method for integrated energy system A comprehensive evaluation framework from design to operation: Enhancing the regulation performance of variable-speed pumped storage plant in extreme pumping conditions Predictive modeling of total pressure loss in a high-speed SI engine exhaust manifold: Influence of penetration length and divergence angle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1