{"title":"Greenhouse gas emissions of tomato production and supply: A systematic review","authors":"Zhu Zhu, Shelie A Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerous life cycle assessments (LCA) have been performed on tomato production; however, results vary greatly due to different system boundaries and assumptions, tomato production methods, and geography. This study seeks to identify the major drivers of differing results and effective interventions in reducing climate impact. This study reviews 50 LCA studies on tomato production within a standardized cradle-to-gate boundary that includes agrochemicals, farm machine fuel, and heating/cooling when applicable. We find that the median emissions are 80 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/mt in open fields (OF), 83 CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/mt in climate-uncontrolled protected environments (CUPE), and 1709 CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/mt in climate-controlled protected environments (CCPE). Next, we evaluate decarbonization strategies for individual farms, including low carbon energy, organic agrochemicals, cogeneration, efficient lighting, precision agriculture, irrigation methods, improved cover materials, mulching, late starting time, and increased crop density. Our review indicates organic agrochemicals and cogeneration do not guarantee emission reductions. Lastly, we review the system-wide decarbonization potential for CCPE versus imported tomatoes grown in OF and CUPE. For most scenarios, our findings indicate imported tomatoes from OF and CUPE have lower emissions than tomatoes sourced locally from CCPE, unless extremely low-carbon heating sources are used for greenhouses. Electric trucks and trains reduce the emissions of imports further.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 108236"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925001156","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Numerous life cycle assessments (LCA) have been performed on tomato production; however, results vary greatly due to different system boundaries and assumptions, tomato production methods, and geography. This study seeks to identify the major drivers of differing results and effective interventions in reducing climate impact. This study reviews 50 LCA studies on tomato production within a standardized cradle-to-gate boundary that includes agrochemicals, farm machine fuel, and heating/cooling when applicable. We find that the median emissions are 80 kg CO2-eq/mt in open fields (OF), 83 CO2-eq/mt in climate-uncontrolled protected environments (CUPE), and 1709 CO2-eq/mt in climate-controlled protected environments (CCPE). Next, we evaluate decarbonization strategies for individual farms, including low carbon energy, organic agrochemicals, cogeneration, efficient lighting, precision agriculture, irrigation methods, improved cover materials, mulching, late starting time, and increased crop density. Our review indicates organic agrochemicals and cogeneration do not guarantee emission reductions. Lastly, we review the system-wide decarbonization potential for CCPE versus imported tomatoes grown in OF and CUPE. For most scenarios, our findings indicate imported tomatoes from OF and CUPE have lower emissions than tomatoes sourced locally from CCPE, unless extremely low-carbon heating sources are used for greenhouses. Electric trucks and trains reduce the emissions of imports further.
对番茄生产进行了大量的生命周期评估(LCA);然而,由于不同的系统边界和假设、番茄生产方法和地理位置,结果差异很大。本研究旨在确定不同结果的主要驱动因素和减少气候影响的有效干预措施。本研究回顾了50项LCA研究,这些研究是在标准化的从摇篮到大门的边界内进行的,包括农用化学品、农业机械燃料和加热/冷却(如适用)。研究发现,开放式农田(OF)、气候控制保护环境(CUPE)和气候控制保护环境(CCPE)的平均排放量分别为80 kg CO2-eq/mt、83 kg CO2-eq/mt和1709 kg CO2-eq/mt。接下来,我们评估了个别农场的脱碳策略,包括低碳能源、有机农用化学品、热电联产、高效照明、精准农业、灌溉方法、改进覆盖材料、覆盖、延迟启动时间和增加作物密度。我们的审查表明,有机农用化学品和热电联产不能保证减排。最后,我们回顾了CCPE与在OF和CUPE中种植的进口番茄在全系统范围内的脱碳潜力。在大多数情况下,我们的研究结果表明,除非温室使用极低碳的热源,否则来自OF和CUPE的进口番茄的排放量低于来自CCPE的本地番茄。电动卡车和火车进一步减少了进口汽车的排放。
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.