{"title":"Greenhouse gas emissions of tomato production and supply: A systematic review","authors":"Zhu Zhu, Shelie A Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerous life cycle assessments (LCA) have been performed on tomato production; however, results vary greatly due to different system boundaries and assumptions, tomato production methods, and geography. This study seeks to identify the major drivers of differing results and effective interventions in reducing climate impact. This study reviews 50 LCA studies on tomato production within a standardized cradle-to-gate boundary that includes agrochemicals, farm machine fuel, and heating/cooling when applicable. We find that the median emissions are 80 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/mt in open fields (OF), 83 CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/mt in climate-uncontrolled protected environments (CUPE), and 1709 CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/mt in climate-controlled protected environments (CCPE). Next, we evaluate decarbonization strategies for individual farms, including low carbon energy, organic agrochemicals, cogeneration, efficient lighting, precision agriculture, irrigation methods, improved cover materials, mulching, late starting time, and increased crop density. Our review indicates organic agrochemicals and cogeneration do not guarantee emission reductions. Lastly, we review the system-wide decarbonization potential for CCPE versus imported tomatoes grown in OF and CUPE. For most scenarios, our findings indicate imported tomatoes from OF and CUPE have lower emissions than tomatoes sourced locally from CCPE, unless extremely low-carbon heating sources are used for greenhouses. Electric trucks and trains reduce the emissions of imports further.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 108236"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925001156","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Numerous life cycle assessments (LCA) have been performed on tomato production; however, results vary greatly due to different system boundaries and assumptions, tomato production methods, and geography. This study seeks to identify the major drivers of differing results and effective interventions in reducing climate impact. This study reviews 50 LCA studies on tomato production within a standardized cradle-to-gate boundary that includes agrochemicals, farm machine fuel, and heating/cooling when applicable. We find that the median emissions are 80 kg CO2-eq/mt in open fields (OF), 83 CO2-eq/mt in climate-uncontrolled protected environments (CUPE), and 1709 CO2-eq/mt in climate-controlled protected environments (CCPE). Next, we evaluate decarbonization strategies for individual farms, including low carbon energy, organic agrochemicals, cogeneration, efficient lighting, precision agriculture, irrigation methods, improved cover materials, mulching, late starting time, and increased crop density. Our review indicates organic agrochemicals and cogeneration do not guarantee emission reductions. Lastly, we review the system-wide decarbonization potential for CCPE versus imported tomatoes grown in OF and CUPE. For most scenarios, our findings indicate imported tomatoes from OF and CUPE have lower emissions than tomatoes sourced locally from CCPE, unless extremely low-carbon heating sources are used for greenhouses. Electric trucks and trains reduce the emissions of imports further.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.