Greenhouse gas emissions of tomato production and supply: A systematic review

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Resources Conservation and Recycling Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108236
Zhu Zhu, Shelie A Miller
{"title":"Greenhouse gas emissions of tomato production and supply: A systematic review","authors":"Zhu Zhu,&nbsp;Shelie A Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerous life cycle assessments (LCA) have been performed on tomato production; however, results vary greatly due to different system boundaries and assumptions, tomato production methods, and geography. This study seeks to identify the major drivers of differing results and effective interventions in reducing climate impact. This study reviews 50 LCA studies on tomato production within a standardized cradle-to-gate boundary that includes agrochemicals, farm machine fuel, and heating/cooling when applicable. We find that the median emissions are 80 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/mt in open fields (OF), 83 CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/mt in climate-uncontrolled protected environments (CUPE), and 1709 CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/mt in climate-controlled protected environments (CCPE). Next, we evaluate decarbonization strategies for individual farms, including low carbon energy, organic agrochemicals, cogeneration, efficient lighting, precision agriculture, irrigation methods, improved cover materials, mulching, late starting time, and increased crop density. Our review indicates organic agrochemicals and cogeneration do not guarantee emission reductions. Lastly, we review the system-wide decarbonization potential for CCPE versus imported tomatoes grown in OF and CUPE. For most scenarios, our findings indicate imported tomatoes from OF and CUPE have lower emissions than tomatoes sourced locally from CCPE, unless extremely low-carbon heating sources are used for greenhouses. Electric trucks and trains reduce the emissions of imports further.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 108236"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925001156","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous life cycle assessments (LCA) have been performed on tomato production; however, results vary greatly due to different system boundaries and assumptions, tomato production methods, and geography. This study seeks to identify the major drivers of differing results and effective interventions in reducing climate impact. This study reviews 50 LCA studies on tomato production within a standardized cradle-to-gate boundary that includes agrochemicals, farm machine fuel, and heating/cooling when applicable. We find that the median emissions are 80 kg CO2-eq/mt in open fields (OF), 83 CO2-eq/mt in climate-uncontrolled protected environments (CUPE), and 1709 CO2-eq/mt in climate-controlled protected environments (CCPE). Next, we evaluate decarbonization strategies for individual farms, including low carbon energy, organic agrochemicals, cogeneration, efficient lighting, precision agriculture, irrigation methods, improved cover materials, mulching, late starting time, and increased crop density. Our review indicates organic agrochemicals and cogeneration do not guarantee emission reductions. Lastly, we review the system-wide decarbonization potential for CCPE versus imported tomatoes grown in OF and CUPE. For most scenarios, our findings indicate imported tomatoes from OF and CUPE have lower emissions than tomatoes sourced locally from CCPE, unless extremely low-carbon heating sources are used for greenhouses. Electric trucks and trains reduce the emissions of imports further.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the strategic potential for Switzerland to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus surplus in agriculture The relative benefits of electrification, energy efficiency, and line drying clothes in the United States Greenhouse gas emissions of tomato production and supply: A systematic review Monitoring street-level improper dumpsites via a multi-modal and LLM-based framework Resource curse or blessing? A city-level analysis of economic and demographic impacts along the Belt and Road
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1