Milking mesenchymal stem cells: Updated protocols for cell lysate, secretome, and exosome extraction, and comparative analysis of their therapeutic potential
Sepideh Zununi Vahed , Seyyedeh Mina Hejazian , William Ndjidda Bakari , Rebecca Landon , Virginie Gueguen , Anne Meddahi-Pellé , Fani Anagnostou , Abolfazl Barzegari , Graciela Pavon-Djavid
{"title":"Milking mesenchymal stem cells: Updated protocols for cell lysate, secretome, and exosome extraction, and comparative analysis of their therapeutic potential","authors":"Sepideh Zununi Vahed , Seyyedeh Mina Hejazian , William Ndjidda Bakari , Rebecca Landon , Virginie Gueguen , Anne Meddahi-Pellé , Fani Anagnostou , Abolfazl Barzegari , Graciela Pavon-Djavid","doi":"10.1016/j.ymeth.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The potential of the cell lysate, secretome, and extracellular vesicles (EVs) of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to modulate the immune response and promote tissue regeneration has positioned them as a promising option for cell-free therapy. Currently, many clinical trials in stem cells-derived EVs and secretome are in progress various diseases and sometimes the results are failing. The major challenge on this roadmap is the lack of a standard extraction method for exosome, secretome, and lysate. The most optimal method for obtaining the secretome of MSCs for clinical utilization involves a comprehensive approach that includes non-destructive collection methods, time optimization, multiple collection rounds, optimization of culture conditions, and quality control measures. Further research and clinical studies are warranted to validate and refine these methods for safe and effective utilization of the MSC exosome, secretome, and lysate in various clinical applications. To address these challenges, it is imperative to establish a standardized and unified methodology to ensure reliable evaluation of these extractions in clinical trials. This review seeks to outline the pros and cons of methods for the preparation of MSCs-derived exosome, and secretome/lysate, and comparative analysis of their therapeutic potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":390,"journal":{"name":"Methods","volume":"238 ","pages":"Pages 40-60"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202325000568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The potential of the cell lysate, secretome, and extracellular vesicles (EVs) of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to modulate the immune response and promote tissue regeneration has positioned them as a promising option for cell-free therapy. Currently, many clinical trials in stem cells-derived EVs and secretome are in progress various diseases and sometimes the results are failing. The major challenge on this roadmap is the lack of a standard extraction method for exosome, secretome, and lysate. The most optimal method for obtaining the secretome of MSCs for clinical utilization involves a comprehensive approach that includes non-destructive collection methods, time optimization, multiple collection rounds, optimization of culture conditions, and quality control measures. Further research and clinical studies are warranted to validate and refine these methods for safe and effective utilization of the MSC exosome, secretome, and lysate in various clinical applications. To address these challenges, it is imperative to establish a standardized and unified methodology to ensure reliable evaluation of these extractions in clinical trials. This review seeks to outline the pros and cons of methods for the preparation of MSCs-derived exosome, and secretome/lysate, and comparative analysis of their therapeutic potential.
期刊介绍:
Methods focuses on rapidly developing techniques in the experimental biological and medical sciences.
Each topical issue, organized by a guest editor who is an expert in the area covered, consists solely of invited quality articles by specialist authors, many of them reviews. Issues are devoted to specific technical approaches with emphasis on clear detailed descriptions of protocols that allow them to be reproduced easily. The background information provided enables researchers to understand the principles underlying the methods; other helpful sections include comparisons of alternative methods giving the advantages and disadvantages of particular methods, guidance on avoiding potential pitfalls, and suggestions for troubleshooting.