Different methods of perfusate administration do not have an effect on synovial concentrations of amikacin following intravenous regional limb perfusion.
Stephanie Ortiz Gutierrez, Isabelle Kilcoyne, Laurel K Saldinger, Lucy Woodward, Jorge E Nieto
{"title":"Different methods of perfusate administration do not have an effect on synovial concentrations of amikacin following intravenous regional limb perfusion.","authors":"Stephanie Ortiz Gutierrez, Isabelle Kilcoyne, Laurel K Saldinger, Lucy Woodward, Jorge E Nieto","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if different methods of perfusate instillation influence synovial amikacin concentrations in the radiocarpal joint (RCJ) after IV regional limb perfusion (IVRLP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>6 healthy horses received an IVRLP using 2 different methods: (1) 2 g amikacin followed by 52 mL 0.9% NaCl (60 mL total; perfusate-A) and (2) 2 g amikacin diluted to 60 mL with 0.9% NaCl (perfusate-D). For both methods, the perfusion was administered over 5 minutes. Joint fluid from the RCJ was sampled at 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after instillation of the perfusate. Systemic concentrations of amikacin were measured prior to IVRLP; at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 29 minutes; and 1 minute after tourniquet removal. Amikacin concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean ± SD peak synovial concentration in the RCJ was 1,447 ± 1,134 μg/mL with perfusate-D and 1,170 ± 977 μg/mL with perfusate-A. Mean ± SD time to peak concentration was 18 ± 7 minutes with perfusate-D and 20 ± 5 minutes with perfusate-A. There was no difference in peak synovial concentration (P = .684) and time to peak concentration (P = .732) between groups. There was no difference in systemic amikacin concentrations over time between groups (P = .196). All horses included reached the target synovial amikacin concentration of > 160 μg/mL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no difference in the systemic or the synovial concentrations of amikacin using different methods of perfusate administration.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Different methods of perfusate administration did not affect synovial concentrations of amikacin achieved when performing IVRLP. There is no advantage to administering amikacin first.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine if different methods of perfusate instillation influence synovial amikacin concentrations in the radiocarpal joint (RCJ) after IV regional limb perfusion (IVRLP).
Methods: 6 healthy horses received an IVRLP using 2 different methods: (1) 2 g amikacin followed by 52 mL 0.9% NaCl (60 mL total; perfusate-A) and (2) 2 g amikacin diluted to 60 mL with 0.9% NaCl (perfusate-D). For both methods, the perfusion was administered over 5 minutes. Joint fluid from the RCJ was sampled at 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after instillation of the perfusate. Systemic concentrations of amikacin were measured prior to IVRLP; at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 29 minutes; and 1 minute after tourniquet removal. Amikacin concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.
Results: Mean ± SD peak synovial concentration in the RCJ was 1,447 ± 1,134 μg/mL with perfusate-D and 1,170 ± 977 μg/mL with perfusate-A. Mean ± SD time to peak concentration was 18 ± 7 minutes with perfusate-D and 20 ± 5 minutes with perfusate-A. There was no difference in peak synovial concentration (P = .684) and time to peak concentration (P = .732) between groups. There was no difference in systemic amikacin concentrations over time between groups (P = .196). All horses included reached the target synovial amikacin concentration of > 160 μg/mL.
Conclusions: There was no difference in the systemic or the synovial concentrations of amikacin using different methods of perfusate administration.
Clinical relevance: Different methods of perfusate administration did not affect synovial concentrations of amikacin achieved when performing IVRLP. There is no advantage to administering amikacin first.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.