The Subcutaneous Ureteral Bypass 3.0 device shows improved short-term outcomes compared to the 2.0 device for treatment of benign ureteral obstructions in cats.
Steven R Magidenko, Allyson C Berent, Chick Weisse, Jessica Mejia, Kenneth Lamb
{"title":"The Subcutaneous Ureteral Bypass 3.0 device shows improved short-term outcomes compared to the 2.0 device for treatment of benign ureteral obstructions in cats.","authors":"Steven R Magidenko, Allyson C Berent, Chick Weisse, Jessica Mejia, Kenneth Lamb","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.09.0255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Subcutaneous Ureteral Bypass (SUB) 3.0 device was designed to treat ureteral obstructions to circumvent kinking found with prior versions where the nephrostomy and cystostomy catheters traversed the body wall. The authors hypothesized that new adaptations would reduce procedure times and kinking without negatively impacting other short-term complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of cats with SUBs for benign ureteral obstructions flushed routinely with tetrasodium EDTA were reviewed. Cats with a SUB 2.0 (group 1), SUB 3.0 (group 2), and unilateral SUB 2.0/unilateral SUB 3.0 (group 3) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 cats (121 renal units [71 SUB 2.0, 50 SUB 3.0]) were included. Most ureteral obstructions were caused by ureterolithiasis ± stricture (89 of 121 [74%]), stricture alone (17 of 121 [14%]), or pyonephrosis (8 of 121 [7%]). Survival rates to 90 days were 75%, 85%, and 94% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Median procedure times for unilateral 2.0, bilateral 2.0, unilateral 3.0, bilateral 3.0, and bilateral 2.0/3.0 were 75, 120, 55, 73.5, and 102.5 minutes, respectively. Kinks were reported in 11 of 71 SUB 2.0s (15.5%) and 0 of 50 SUB 3.0s (0%), blood clot occlusion was reported in 10 of 71 SUB 2.0s (14%) and 2 of 50 SUB 3.0s (4%), and obstruction from mineralization was documented in 1 SUB 3.0 (2%). One cat in group 1, and one in group 2 developed ≥ 1 infection during this follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results support that the SUB 3.0 is associated with fewer short-term complications and shorter surgical times than the SUB 2.0 over a 90-day follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The SUB 3.0 requires shorter anesthetic times and results in less kinking than previous versions. Follow-up studies to assess long-term complications, like chronic infections or mineralization, are underway.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.09.0255","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The Subcutaneous Ureteral Bypass (SUB) 3.0 device was designed to treat ureteral obstructions to circumvent kinking found with prior versions where the nephrostomy and cystostomy catheters traversed the body wall. The authors hypothesized that new adaptations would reduce procedure times and kinking without negatively impacting other short-term complication rates.
Methods: The medical records of cats with SUBs for benign ureteral obstructions flushed routinely with tetrasodium EDTA were reviewed. Cats with a SUB 2.0 (group 1), SUB 3.0 (group 2), and unilateral SUB 2.0/unilateral SUB 3.0 (group 3) were compared.
Results: 80 cats (121 renal units [71 SUB 2.0, 50 SUB 3.0]) were included. Most ureteral obstructions were caused by ureterolithiasis ± stricture (89 of 121 [74%]), stricture alone (17 of 121 [14%]), or pyonephrosis (8 of 121 [7%]). Survival rates to 90 days were 75%, 85%, and 94% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Median procedure times for unilateral 2.0, bilateral 2.0, unilateral 3.0, bilateral 3.0, and bilateral 2.0/3.0 were 75, 120, 55, 73.5, and 102.5 minutes, respectively. Kinks were reported in 11 of 71 SUB 2.0s (15.5%) and 0 of 50 SUB 3.0s (0%), blood clot occlusion was reported in 10 of 71 SUB 2.0s (14%) and 2 of 50 SUB 3.0s (4%), and obstruction from mineralization was documented in 1 SUB 3.0 (2%). One cat in group 1, and one in group 2 developed ≥ 1 infection during this follow-up period.
Conclusions: The results support that the SUB 3.0 is associated with fewer short-term complications and shorter surgical times than the SUB 2.0 over a 90-day follow-up period.
Clinical relevance: The SUB 3.0 requires shorter anesthetic times and results in less kinking than previous versions. Follow-up studies to assess long-term complications, like chronic infections or mineralization, are underway.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.