Prevalence of Airflow Limitation and Emphysema in Lung Cancer Screening Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Chest Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.021
Hyewon Choi, Il-Youp Kwak, Chung-Ryul Oh, Jin Mo Goo, Soon Ho Yoon
{"title":"Prevalence of Airflow Limitation and Emphysema in Lung Cancer Screening Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Hyewon Choi, Il-Youp Kwak, Chung-Ryul Oh, Jin Mo Goo, Soon Ho Yoon","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are becoming important for improving the prognosis of individuals who smoke heavily. Despite the higher risk of COPD among individuals participating in lung cancer screening, many of these patients remain underdiagnosed.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>How many participants in lung cancer screening have emphysema or airflow limitation? If spirometry is incorporated into the screening, how many additional patients with airflow limitation could be newly identified?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>The Ovid-MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to November 30, 2023. We included original studies reporting the prevalence of CT-confirmed emphysema and spirometry-confirmed airflow limitation. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of emphysema and airflow limitation. For studies reporting severity, we analyzed the percentage of mild versus moderate to severe cases. We also calculated the proportion of newly confirmed airflow limitation cases via spirometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 42 studies were included (emphysema, n=18; airflow limitation, n=13; both, n=11), comprising 126,842 individuals for emphysema and 72,209 for airflow limitation. The pooled prevalence of emphysema was 45.3% (95% CI), 39.3-51.2%), and that of airflow limitation was 40.1% (95% CI, 33.4-46.8%). Moderate to severe emphysema was observed in 28.8% (95% CI, 24.2-33.4%) of emphysema cases, while 54.3% (95% CI, 40.6-60.6%) had moderate to very severe airflow limitation. Furthermore, 65.2% (95% CI, 55.7-74.7%) of airflow limitation cases identified by spirometry were previously unrecognized by patients.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Among screening participants, 45.3% had emphysema and 40.1% had airflow limitation, with 28.8% and 54.3% of these cases being moderate to severe, respectively. Furthermore, 65% of airflow limitation cases were previously undiagnosed. These findings suggest that incorporating spirometry into screening programs may enhance COPD detection and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early detection and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are becoming important for improving the prognosis of individuals who smoke heavily. Despite the higher risk of COPD among individuals participating in lung cancer screening, many of these patients remain underdiagnosed.

Research questions: How many participants in lung cancer screening have emphysema or airflow limitation? If spirometry is incorporated into the screening, how many additional patients with airflow limitation could be newly identified?

Study design and methods: The Ovid-MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to November 30, 2023. We included original studies reporting the prevalence of CT-confirmed emphysema and spirometry-confirmed airflow limitation. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of emphysema and airflow limitation. For studies reporting severity, we analyzed the percentage of mild versus moderate to severe cases. We also calculated the proportion of newly confirmed airflow limitation cases via spirometry.

Results: In total, 42 studies were included (emphysema, n=18; airflow limitation, n=13; both, n=11), comprising 126,842 individuals for emphysema and 72,209 for airflow limitation. The pooled prevalence of emphysema was 45.3% (95% CI), 39.3-51.2%), and that of airflow limitation was 40.1% (95% CI, 33.4-46.8%). Moderate to severe emphysema was observed in 28.8% (95% CI, 24.2-33.4%) of emphysema cases, while 54.3% (95% CI, 40.6-60.6%) had moderate to very severe airflow limitation. Furthermore, 65.2% (95% CI, 55.7-74.7%) of airflow limitation cases identified by spirometry were previously unrecognized by patients.

Interpretation: Among screening participants, 45.3% had emphysema and 40.1% had airflow limitation, with 28.8% and 54.3% of these cases being moderate to severe, respectively. Furthermore, 65% of airflow limitation cases were previously undiagnosed. These findings suggest that incorporating spirometry into screening programs may enhance COPD detection and management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
期刊最新文献
PRISm is an important risk factor for development of COPD, also in non-smokers. DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION AND CLINICAL FINDINGS IN CHILDREN WITH PERSISTENT TACHYPNEA OF INFANCY/NEUROENDOCRINE CELL HYPERPLASIA OF INFANCY: A EUROPEAN MULTICENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. Prevalence of Airflow Limitation and Emphysema in Lung Cancer Screening Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Changes in Lung Function and Mortality Risk in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Characteristic Pulmonary Impedance With Exercise Detects Abnormal Pulmonary Vascular Response and Uncoupling in Pulmonary Hypertension Resulting From Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1