Bacillus Genotypes Exhibit Antagonistic Effects on Lettuce-Based Enterobacter Pathotypes.

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY Current Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-03-09 DOI:10.1007/s00284-025-04163-8
Damilola N Adeyemi, Esther O Ajide, Gboyega E Adebami, Moses A Abiala
{"title":"Bacillus Genotypes Exhibit Antagonistic Effects on Lettuce-Based Enterobacter Pathotypes.","authors":"Damilola N Adeyemi, Esther O Ajide, Gboyega E Adebami, Moses A Abiala","doi":"10.1007/s00284-025-04163-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, among ready-to-eat (RTE) vegetables, lettuce is well-known as a potential host for Enterobacteriaceae, which theatens public health. However, in addition to E. coli, pathogenic Enterobacter species associated with RTE lettuce is poorly investigated, as well as their genetic relationship with sources of contamination has not been determined. This study investigated the evolutionary relationship between Enterobacter species and their antibiotic resistance attributes in RTE lettuce, irrigation water, and the soil of lettuce farms. Enterobacter species had the highest occurrence in the irrigation water (38%), followed by both the RTE lettuce (31%) and the soil of the lettuce farm (31%). The 16S rRNA-identified the bacteria isolates as Enterobacter species. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that Enterobacter species from RTE lettuce and irrigation water maintained a strong evolutionary relationship in comparison with those from the soil of the lettuce farm. In addition, irrespective of the source of contamination, the isolates demonstrated resistance to 67% of the 12 antibiotics tested. To overcome these challenges, efforts have been made to identify novel antimicrobial agents, especially from eco-friendly soil bacteria. Among the 76 soil bacterial isolates that were assessed via the antagonist‒pathogen agar plug method, only two (IBT42 and VFK47) exhibited outstanding (P = 0.05) antagonism against > 50% of the Enterobacter pathotypes in comparison with the control. The potency of IBT42 and VFK47 were validated via agar well diffusion, the minimum inhibitory concentration, and the minimum bactericidal concentration. The 16S rRNA and phylogenetic analysis revealed that the identities of IBT42 and VFK47 were Bacillus mycoides and Bacillus cereus, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":11360,"journal":{"name":"Current Microbiology","volume":"82 4","pages":"181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-025-04163-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, among ready-to-eat (RTE) vegetables, lettuce is well-known as a potential host for Enterobacteriaceae, which theatens public health. However, in addition to E. coli, pathogenic Enterobacter species associated with RTE lettuce is poorly investigated, as well as their genetic relationship with sources of contamination has not been determined. This study investigated the evolutionary relationship between Enterobacter species and their antibiotic resistance attributes in RTE lettuce, irrigation water, and the soil of lettuce farms. Enterobacter species had the highest occurrence in the irrigation water (38%), followed by both the RTE lettuce (31%) and the soil of the lettuce farm (31%). The 16S rRNA-identified the bacteria isolates as Enterobacter species. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that Enterobacter species from RTE lettuce and irrigation water maintained a strong evolutionary relationship in comparison with those from the soil of the lettuce farm. In addition, irrespective of the source of contamination, the isolates demonstrated resistance to 67% of the 12 antibiotics tested. To overcome these challenges, efforts have been made to identify novel antimicrobial agents, especially from eco-friendly soil bacteria. Among the 76 soil bacterial isolates that were assessed via the antagonist‒pathogen agar plug method, only two (IBT42 and VFK47) exhibited outstanding (P = 0.05) antagonism against > 50% of the Enterobacter pathotypes in comparison with the control. The potency of IBT42 and VFK47 were validated via agar well diffusion, the minimum inhibitory concentration, and the minimum bactericidal concentration. The 16S rRNA and phylogenetic analysis revealed that the identities of IBT42 and VFK47 were Bacillus mycoides and Bacillus cereus, respectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Microbiology
Current Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Current Microbiology is a well-established journal that publishes articles in all aspects of microbial cells and the interactions between the microorganisms, their hosts and the environment. Current Microbiology publishes original research articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor, spanning the following areas: physiology, biochemistry, genetics, genomics, biotechnology, ecology, evolution, morphology, taxonomy, diagnostic methods, medical and clinical microbiology and immunology as applied to microorganisms.
期刊最新文献
Description of Cytobacillus Mangrovibacter sp. nov., and Cytobacillus Spartinae sp. nov., Isolated from Mangrove Sediment. Polaribacter uvawellassae sp. nov., a Member of the Family Flavobacteriaceae Isolated from Mud Crab (Scylla serrata). Analysis of Codon Usage Patterns in a Rare Palmitoleic Acid Production Oleaginous Yeast, Scheffersomyces segobiensis. Dechloromonas aquae sp. nov., A Novel Species Isolated from Aquaculture Water of Grass Carp. Bacillus Genotypes Exhibit Antagonistic Effects on Lettuce-Based Enterobacter Pathotypes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1