Hesitate to resuscitate? A cohort study of hesitation to initiate resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrests

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110572
Lovisa Alarik , Maja Nelson , Lovisa Terling , Anna Thoren , Therese Djärv
{"title":"Hesitate to resuscitate? A cohort study of hesitation to initiate resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrests","authors":"Lovisa Alarik ,&nbsp;Maja Nelson ,&nbsp;Lovisa Terling ,&nbsp;Anna Thoren ,&nbsp;Therese Djärv","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the event of an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), the fundamental principle is to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). Lately, decisions on Do-not-attempt CPR (DNACPR) have received increasing attention which might affect the perception of medical staff in initiation of resuscitation.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To investigate to which extent medical staff hesitate to initiate CPR when arriving at an IHCA and to explore the factors influencing their hesitation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nationwide cohort study based on data from the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation between the years 2007–2023 including all IHCAs aged 18 and over. Hesitation was defined based on answers on the variable “Expression of hesitation to start CPR”, it was categorized into either Hesitation (Yes) or Non-hesitation (no/unknown/left blank). Additional free text comments regarding the grounds for the hesitation was evaluated with an inductive qualitative content analysis. Hesitation ratio was calculated as the quote per variable.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 36 471 patients with IHCA, the hesitation ratio was 8% (<em>n</em> = 2757). The patients mean age was 79 years in the hesitation group compared to 72 in the non-hesitation group (p-value &lt; 0.01). Hesitation ratio was higher in patients admitted to general wards than in patients admitted to intensive care units (11% vs. 3%, p-value &lt; 0.01). A hesitation ratio over 10% was found for; age, ongoing myocardial infarction, general ward, non-ECG-surveillance and unwitnessed. Grounds for the hesitations were most commonly due to a prior DNACPR order or a wish from the staff to have such, some related to age or comorbidity but none related to frailty.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Hesitation to initiate CPR in IHCA occur, particularly among older patients admitted in general wards. Hesitation relates to lack of resuscitation decisions or staff expressing an opinion that a DNACPR decision should have been made prior to the IHCA. This suggests that the routine around discussions and decisions of DNACPR orders could be improved.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 110572"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030095722500084X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In the event of an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), the fundamental principle is to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). Lately, decisions on Do-not-attempt CPR (DNACPR) have received increasing attention which might affect the perception of medical staff in initiation of resuscitation.

Aim

To investigate to which extent medical staff hesitate to initiate CPR when arriving at an IHCA and to explore the factors influencing their hesitation.

Methods

Nationwide cohort study based on data from the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation between the years 2007–2023 including all IHCAs aged 18 and over. Hesitation was defined based on answers on the variable “Expression of hesitation to start CPR”, it was categorized into either Hesitation (Yes) or Non-hesitation (no/unknown/left blank). Additional free text comments regarding the grounds for the hesitation was evaluated with an inductive qualitative content analysis. Hesitation ratio was calculated as the quote per variable.

Results

Among 36 471 patients with IHCA, the hesitation ratio was 8% (n = 2757). The patients mean age was 79 years in the hesitation group compared to 72 in the non-hesitation group (p-value < 0.01). Hesitation ratio was higher in patients admitted to general wards than in patients admitted to intensive care units (11% vs. 3%, p-value < 0.01). A hesitation ratio over 10% was found for; age, ongoing myocardial infarction, general ward, non-ECG-surveillance and unwitnessed. Grounds for the hesitations were most commonly due to a prior DNACPR order or a wish from the staff to have such, some related to age or comorbidity but none related to frailty.

Conclusion

Hesitation to initiate CPR in IHCA occur, particularly among older patients admitted in general wards. Hesitation relates to lack of resuscitation decisions or staff expressing an opinion that a DNACPR decision should have been made prior to the IHCA. This suggests that the routine around discussions and decisions of DNACPR orders could be improved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犹豫要不要复苏?院内心脏骤停患者启动复苏犹豫的队列研究。
背景:在发生院内心脏骤停(IHCA)的情况下,基本原则是启动心肺复苏(CPR)。最近,关于不尝试CPR (dacpr)的决定受到越来越多的关注,这可能会影响医务人员对启动复苏的看法。目的:调查医务人员到达IHCA时对启动心肺复苏术的犹豫程度,并探讨其犹豫的影响因素。方法:基于2007-2023年瑞典心肺复苏登记处数据的全国队列研究,包括所有18岁及以上的ihca。犹豫是根据对变量“开始心肺复苏时犹豫的表达”的回答来定义的,它分为犹豫(是)和不犹豫(否/未知/空白)。关于犹豫理由的额外自由文本评论通过归纳定性内容分析进行评估。犹豫率以每个变量的报价计算。结果:36471例IHCA患者中,犹豫率为8% (n=2757)。犹豫组患者的平均年龄为79岁,而非犹豫组患者的平均年龄为72岁(p值结论:在IHCA患者中,特别是在普通病房住院的老年患者中,开始心肺复苏时会出现犹豫。犹豫与缺乏复苏决定或工作人员表示应在IHCA之前做出DNACPR决定的意见有关。这表明围绕DNACPR顺序的讨论和决定的例行程序可以得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
The association of mechanical versus manual chest compressions with neurological outcomes at hospital discharge among out-of-hospital cardiac arrests treated with intra-arrest transport Global distributor prices of automated external defibrillators for home use far exceed modelled cost-effectiveness thresholds The long shadow of frailty: why one-year survival starts before ICU Reply to: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests caught on camera: what happens next? Machine learning in cardiac arrest: from artificial intelligence, value-based healthcare, to prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1