Hedonic or Utilitarian: The effect of video and text styles on consumers’ visual attention, mental imagery quality, and purchase intention in online food ordering interfaces

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE Displays Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.displa.2025.103016
Mengyao Qi , Kenta Ono , Lujin Mao , Makoto Watanabe , Jinghua Huang
{"title":"Hedonic or Utilitarian: The effect of video and text styles on consumers’ visual attention, mental imagery quality, and purchase intention in online food ordering interfaces","authors":"Mengyao Qi ,&nbsp;Kenta Ono ,&nbsp;Lujin Mao ,&nbsp;Makoto Watanabe ,&nbsp;Jinghua Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.displa.2025.103016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the substantial resources allocated to video and text presentations, indiscriminately applying video and text presentations regardless of information style may not improve sales or enhance the consumers’ ordering experience, and can even lead to unnecessary resource waste. Therefore, this study aims to examine the effects of video and text styles (hedonic vs. utilitarian) on consumers’ visual attention and subjective assessments. The results indicate that the utilitarian text style could be a favorable choice for online food ordering interfaces, as it not only captures greater visual attention but also enhances users’ mental imagery quality and purchase intention. Additionally, the selection of video styles should be guided by the specific objectives of the context: the utilitarian video style appears to be a more effective option for encouraging purchasing behavior, as it is associated with significantly higher fixation counts, while the hedonic video style may be more conducive to enhancing user engagement and extending online duration, as indicated by its longer average fixation duration. These findings provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of short-form video and text across different information styles, contributing to the design of more user-friendly online food ordering interfaces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50570,"journal":{"name":"Displays","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 103016"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Displays","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141938225000538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the substantial resources allocated to video and text presentations, indiscriminately applying video and text presentations regardless of information style may not improve sales or enhance the consumers’ ordering experience, and can even lead to unnecessary resource waste. Therefore, this study aims to examine the effects of video and text styles (hedonic vs. utilitarian) on consumers’ visual attention and subjective assessments. The results indicate that the utilitarian text style could be a favorable choice for online food ordering interfaces, as it not only captures greater visual attention but also enhances users’ mental imagery quality and purchase intention. Additionally, the selection of video styles should be guided by the specific objectives of the context: the utilitarian video style appears to be a more effective option for encouraging purchasing behavior, as it is associated with significantly higher fixation counts, while the hedonic video style may be more conducive to enhancing user engagement and extending online duration, as indicated by its longer average fixation duration. These findings provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of short-form video and text across different information styles, contributing to the design of more user-friendly online food ordering interfaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
享乐主义还是功利主义:视频和文字风格对消费者在线订餐界面视觉注意力、心理意象质量和购买意愿的影响
在大量资源被分配给视频和文字展示的情况下,无论信息风格如何,不加选择地使用视频和文字展示,不仅不能提高销售,也不能增强消费者的订购体验,甚至会导致不必要的资源浪费。因此,本研究旨在探讨视频和文本风格(享乐主义与功利主义)对消费者视觉注意力和主观评价的影响。结果表明,实用主义的文字风格可以作为在线订餐界面的有利选择,因为它不仅能吸引更多的视觉注意力,还能提高用户的心理意象质量和购买意愿。此外,视频风格的选择应以情境的具体目标为指导:功利主义视频风格似乎是鼓励购买行为的更有效选择,因为它与更高的固定次数相关,而享乐主义视频风格可能更有利于提高用户参与度和延长在线时间,这表明它的平均固定时间更长。这些发现为短视频和文本在不同信息风格下的有效性提供了有价值的见解,有助于设计更友好的在线订餐界面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Displays
Displays 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
25.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Displays is the international journal covering the research and development of display technology, its effective presentation and perception of information, and applications and systems including display-human interface. Technical papers on practical developments in Displays technology provide an effective channel to promote greater understanding and cross-fertilization across the diverse disciplines of the Displays community. Original research papers solving ergonomics issues at the display-human interface advance effective presentation of information. Tutorial papers covering fundamentals intended for display technologies and human factor engineers new to the field will also occasionally featured.
期刊最新文献
Towards high-dimensional IMU-based human activity recognition: data construction via 3D body modeling and classification with a multi-channel attention fusion network Single blind image deblurring: advances and prospects All Inkjet-Printed red Micro Quantum-Dots Light-Emitting diodes (QLEDs): Fabrication and performance Comparative analysis of virtual keyboard typing methods in VR: controller, poke, and pinch techniques Circadian and color analysis of programming themes: effects of theme design, ambient lighting, and viewing distance on developer visual ergonomics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1