Pursuing higher compliance for the mandatory electric bus program in Vietnam: Should we keep a traditional business model or promote a fleet leasing model?

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS Research in Transportation Business and Management Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101327
An Minh Ngoc , Hiroaki Nishiuchi , Yasuhiro Shiomi , Le Hoan
{"title":"Pursuing higher compliance for the mandatory electric bus program in Vietnam: Should we keep a traditional business model or promote a fleet leasing model?","authors":"An Minh Ngoc ,&nbsp;Hiroaki Nishiuchi ,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Shiomi ,&nbsp;Le Hoan","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates and compares the economic and environmental benefits of a traditional business model as opposed to a fleet leasing model for electric buses (e-buses). A combination of the emission model and financial model, along with secondary data, was adopted to simulate the environmental and economic impacts of three bus technologies (i.e. diesel buses, compressed natural gas buses, and electric buses). The environmental aspects were evaluated by setting the energy flow of CO<sub>2</sub> emission simulation, considering both direct and indirect emissions. The economic impacts of e-bus versus baseline diesel and CNG alternatives were estimated using the metric total cost of ownership (TCO) per km. We determined that although the mandatory e-bus program might represent a viable option when compared to the combustion alternatives from an environmental standpoint, e-buses are less appealing to bus companies due to their significantly lower cost-competitiveness under a traditional (current) business model. In contrast, a fleet leasing model brings large financial benefits to bus companies, increasing more probability of acceptability and intention of compliance from bus operators. Specifically, our analysis estimates that implementing the e-bus mandatory program with a new leasing model will result in a maximum of 47 %, 90, and 97 % emission removal in 2030, 2040, and 2050 respectively. In the same period, the TCO per km reduces a maximum of 41.8 %, 31.0 %, and 17.4 %, respectively, compared to the traditional business model. The findings can be valuable for cities, practitioners, and bus companies, aiding in a better understanding of the challenges and benefits of the bus leasing model in order to better plan for e-bus uptake in Vietnam.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 101327"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525000422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates and compares the economic and environmental benefits of a traditional business model as opposed to a fleet leasing model for electric buses (e-buses). A combination of the emission model and financial model, along with secondary data, was adopted to simulate the environmental and economic impacts of three bus technologies (i.e. diesel buses, compressed natural gas buses, and electric buses). The environmental aspects were evaluated by setting the energy flow of CO2 emission simulation, considering both direct and indirect emissions. The economic impacts of e-bus versus baseline diesel and CNG alternatives were estimated using the metric total cost of ownership (TCO) per km. We determined that although the mandatory e-bus program might represent a viable option when compared to the combustion alternatives from an environmental standpoint, e-buses are less appealing to bus companies due to their significantly lower cost-competitiveness under a traditional (current) business model. In contrast, a fleet leasing model brings large financial benefits to bus companies, increasing more probability of acceptability and intention of compliance from bus operators. Specifically, our analysis estimates that implementing the e-bus mandatory program with a new leasing model will result in a maximum of 47 %, 90, and 97 % emission removal in 2030, 2040, and 2050 respectively. In the same period, the TCO per km reduces a maximum of 41.8 %, 31.0 %, and 17.4 %, respectively, compared to the traditional business model. The findings can be valuable for cities, practitioners, and bus companies, aiding in a better understanding of the challenges and benefits of the bus leasing model in order to better plan for e-bus uptake in Vietnam.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为越南的强制性电动巴士项目追求更高的合规性:我们应该保持传统的商业模式还是推广车队租赁模式?
本文调查并比较了传统商业模式与电动公交车(e-bus)车队租赁模式的经济和环境效益。采用排放模型和财务模型相结合的方法,结合二次数据,模拟了三种公交车技术(即柴油公交车、压缩天然气公交车和电动公交车)对环境和经济的影响。通过设置二氧化碳排放模拟的能量流,同时考虑直接和间接排放,对环境因素进行了评价。使用每公里总拥有成本(TCO)来估计电动巴士与基线柴油和CNG替代品的经济影响。我们认为,尽管从环保的角度来看,强制性的电动巴士计划可能是一个可行的选择,但电动巴士对公共汽车公司的吸引力较小,因为在传统(当前)商业模式下,电动巴士的成本竞争力明显较低。相比之下,车队租赁模式为公交公司带来了巨大的经济效益,增加了公交运营商接受和遵守的可能性。具体来说,我们的分析估计,在2030年、2040年和2050年,采用新的租赁模式实施电动巴士强制性计划将分别导致47%、90%和97%的排放量减少。同期,与传统商业模式相比,每公里TCO最大降幅分别为41.8%、31.0%和17.4%。研究结果对城市、从业人员和公交公司都很有价值,有助于更好地理解公交租赁模式的挑战和好处,从而更好地规划越南的电动公交普及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
期刊最新文献
Public pricing policies and multidimensional efficiency in urban public transport: Evidence from French operators How passenger satisfaction affects the sustainable development of integrated passenger and freight transport based on public traffic: An evolutionary game approach Enhancing cross-border rail connectivity: A quasi-natural experiment on boosting regional innovation performance through the China-Laos railway A fuzzy decision support process for railway sleeper maintenance and renewal management Optimization approach for planning urban on-street parking considering car and truck users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1