{"title":"Do not take away my pleasure: Investigating the conflict between hedonic foods and entomophagy among Chinese consumers","authors":"Zining Wang , Jaewoo Park","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Against the backdrop of increasing concerns over food sustainability and the urgent need for alternative protein sources, insect-based foods have emerged as a promising solution. However, despite their nutritional and environmental advantages, low consumer acceptance remains a significant barrier. This research specifically explored the role of food category—utilitarian and hedonic—and found that while insect ingredients were more readily accepted in utilitarian foods, their inclusion in hedonic foods elicited significantly more negative consumer responses. Drawing on perceived value theory, we further demonstrated that this effect was driven by a reduction in perceived utilitarian and hedonic values, indicating that consumers perceived insect-based hedonic foods as not only less pleasurable and enjoyable but also less functional compared to their traditional counterparts. Moreover, we identified disgust toward entomophagy as a crucial moderating factor: higher levels of disgust led to stronger negative reactions, whereas a small subset of consumers with low disgust exhibited even more favorable responses to insect-based hedonic foods. Our findings significantly contribute to the existing literature and offer important insights for food marketers and policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105499"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000746","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Against the backdrop of increasing concerns over food sustainability and the urgent need for alternative protein sources, insect-based foods have emerged as a promising solution. However, despite their nutritional and environmental advantages, low consumer acceptance remains a significant barrier. This research specifically explored the role of food category—utilitarian and hedonic—and found that while insect ingredients were more readily accepted in utilitarian foods, their inclusion in hedonic foods elicited significantly more negative consumer responses. Drawing on perceived value theory, we further demonstrated that this effect was driven by a reduction in perceived utilitarian and hedonic values, indicating that consumers perceived insect-based hedonic foods as not only less pleasurable and enjoyable but also less functional compared to their traditional counterparts. Moreover, we identified disgust toward entomophagy as a crucial moderating factor: higher levels of disgust led to stronger negative reactions, whereas a small subset of consumers with low disgust exhibited even more favorable responses to insect-based hedonic foods. Our findings significantly contribute to the existing literature and offer important insights for food marketers and policymakers.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.