Do not take away my pleasure: Investigating the conflict between hedonic foods and entomophagy among Chinese consumers

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105499
Zining Wang , Jaewoo Park
{"title":"Do not take away my pleasure: Investigating the conflict between hedonic foods and entomophagy among Chinese consumers","authors":"Zining Wang ,&nbsp;Jaewoo Park","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Against the backdrop of increasing concerns over food sustainability and the urgent need for alternative protein sources, insect-based foods have emerged as a promising solution. However, despite their nutritional and environmental advantages, low consumer acceptance remains a significant barrier. This research specifically explored the role of food category—utilitarian and hedonic—and found that while insect ingredients were more readily accepted in utilitarian foods, their inclusion in hedonic foods elicited significantly more negative consumer responses. Drawing on perceived value theory, we further demonstrated that this effect was driven by a reduction in perceived utilitarian and hedonic values, indicating that consumers perceived insect-based hedonic foods as not only less pleasurable and enjoyable but also less functional compared to their traditional counterparts. Moreover, we identified disgust toward entomophagy as a crucial moderating factor: higher levels of disgust led to stronger negative reactions, whereas a small subset of consumers with low disgust exhibited even more favorable responses to insect-based hedonic foods. Our findings significantly contribute to the existing literature and offer important insights for food marketers and policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105499"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000746","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the backdrop of increasing concerns over food sustainability and the urgent need for alternative protein sources, insect-based foods have emerged as a promising solution. However, despite their nutritional and environmental advantages, low consumer acceptance remains a significant barrier. This research specifically explored the role of food category—utilitarian and hedonic—and found that while insect ingredients were more readily accepted in utilitarian foods, their inclusion in hedonic foods elicited significantly more negative consumer responses. Drawing on perceived value theory, we further demonstrated that this effect was driven by a reduction in perceived utilitarian and hedonic values, indicating that consumers perceived insect-based hedonic foods as not only less pleasurable and enjoyable but also less functional compared to their traditional counterparts. Moreover, we identified disgust toward entomophagy as a crucial moderating factor: higher levels of disgust led to stronger negative reactions, whereas a small subset of consumers with low disgust exhibited even more favorable responses to insect-based hedonic foods. Our findings significantly contribute to the existing literature and offer important insights for food marketers and policymakers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Dietary dilemmas: Navigating trade-offs in food choice for sustainability, health, naturalness, and price “Grilling the myths”: Uncomfortable truths and promising paths in consumer research on plant-based alternatives Is it the name, or is it the impact? A sensory and consumer science changing with the times. Do not take away my pleasure: Investigating the conflict between hedonic foods and entomophagy among Chinese consumers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1