{"title":"From emotional blunting to moral choices: The role of alexithymia in trait psychopathy and utilitarian decision-making","authors":"Serra Şandor","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the relationship between alexithymia, psychopathy, and moral decision-making, focusing on how emotional processing influences utilitarian choices in moral dilemmas. Based on the dual-process theory, it is hypothesized that alexithymia, marked by difficulties in emotional awareness, predicts increased utilitarian decision-making, particularly in personal moral dilemmas. Psychopathy, characterized by reduced empathy and emotional arousal, is examined as a mediator in this relationship.</div><div>In Study 1, 238 university students completed the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale, and responded to moral dilemmas. Regression and mediation analyses revealed that psychopathy, particularly primary psychopathy, mediated the relationship between alexithymia and utilitarian choices in personal moral dilemmas. Study 2 involved 49 participants, divided into high and low alexithymia groups, who were assessed for physiological and subjective emotional responses to stimuli. Results supported the hypo-arousal theory, with high alexithymia participants showing reduced emotional responsiveness and more utilitarian decisions.</div><div>The findings suggest that emotional alteration in alexithymia, coupled with psychopathic traits, leads to greater reliance on cognitive strategies in moral decision-making. This study highlights the role of emotional processing in moral behavior and provides insights into the interaction between alexithymia and psychopathy in shaping moral choices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 113147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between alexithymia, psychopathy, and moral decision-making, focusing on how emotional processing influences utilitarian choices in moral dilemmas. Based on the dual-process theory, it is hypothesized that alexithymia, marked by difficulties in emotional awareness, predicts increased utilitarian decision-making, particularly in personal moral dilemmas. Psychopathy, characterized by reduced empathy and emotional arousal, is examined as a mediator in this relationship.
In Study 1, 238 university students completed the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale, and responded to moral dilemmas. Regression and mediation analyses revealed that psychopathy, particularly primary psychopathy, mediated the relationship between alexithymia and utilitarian choices in personal moral dilemmas. Study 2 involved 49 participants, divided into high and low alexithymia groups, who were assessed for physiological and subjective emotional responses to stimuli. Results supported the hypo-arousal theory, with high alexithymia participants showing reduced emotional responsiveness and more utilitarian decisions.
The findings suggest that emotional alteration in alexithymia, coupled with psychopathic traits, leads to greater reliance on cognitive strategies in moral decision-making. This study highlights the role of emotional processing in moral behavior and provides insights into the interaction between alexithymia and psychopathy in shaping moral choices.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.