{"title":"The role of conscientiousness in meeting psychological needs: A whole trait theory perspective","authors":"Paul A. Story, Zhardae Bailey, Niles G. Foo","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>According to whole trait theory (WTT; <span><span>Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2021</span></span>), personality traits serve as a mechanism to fulfill goals, including satisfying basic psychological needs. Conscientiousness may be especially suited for satisfying such needs as it involves task and goal-directed behavior. Given that conscientiousness also includes the avoidance of negative behaviors, it may prevent the frustration of needs as well. Across two studies, we examined the usefulness of conscientiousness in predicting both need satisfaction and frustration. In study 1, we examined whether conscientiousness naturally predicts need satisfaction and need frustration at work, as well as workplace performance. In study 2, we assigned participants a task or a connection goal to determine if these goals would activate the associated personality traits and whether these traits would then increase the chances of satisfying specific psychological needs. Across both studies, conscientiousness was associated with increased need satisfaction and decreased need frustration. In study 1, conscientiousness was also associated with better workplace performance, both directly and indirectly through the needs. In study 2, conscientious goals were more likely to satisfy, and avoid frustrating, competence needs compared to social goals. We discuss the results considering whole trait and self-determination theory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 113138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188692500100X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
According to whole trait theory (WTT; Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2021), personality traits serve as a mechanism to fulfill goals, including satisfying basic psychological needs. Conscientiousness may be especially suited for satisfying such needs as it involves task and goal-directed behavior. Given that conscientiousness also includes the avoidance of negative behaviors, it may prevent the frustration of needs as well. Across two studies, we examined the usefulness of conscientiousness in predicting both need satisfaction and frustration. In study 1, we examined whether conscientiousness naturally predicts need satisfaction and need frustration at work, as well as workplace performance. In study 2, we assigned participants a task or a connection goal to determine if these goals would activate the associated personality traits and whether these traits would then increase the chances of satisfying specific psychological needs. Across both studies, conscientiousness was associated with increased need satisfaction and decreased need frustration. In study 1, conscientiousness was also associated with better workplace performance, both directly and indirectly through the needs. In study 2, conscientious goals were more likely to satisfy, and avoid frustrating, competence needs compared to social goals. We discuss the results considering whole trait and self-determination theory.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.