The role of conscientiousness in meeting psychological needs: A whole trait theory perspective

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113138
Paul A. Story, Zhardae Bailey, Niles G. Foo
{"title":"The role of conscientiousness in meeting psychological needs: A whole trait theory perspective","authors":"Paul A. Story,&nbsp;Zhardae Bailey,&nbsp;Niles G. Foo","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>According to whole trait theory (WTT; <span><span>Fleeson &amp; Jayawickreme, 2021</span></span>), personality traits serve as a mechanism to fulfill goals, including satisfying basic psychological needs. Conscientiousness may be especially suited for satisfying such needs as it involves task and goal-directed behavior. Given that conscientiousness also includes the avoidance of negative behaviors, it may prevent the frustration of needs as well. Across two studies, we examined the usefulness of conscientiousness in predicting both need satisfaction and frustration. In study 1, we examined whether conscientiousness naturally predicts need satisfaction and need frustration at work, as well as workplace performance. In study 2, we assigned participants a task or a connection goal to determine if these goals would activate the associated personality traits and whether these traits would then increase the chances of satisfying specific psychological needs. Across both studies, conscientiousness was associated with increased need satisfaction and decreased need frustration. In study 1, conscientiousness was also associated with better workplace performance, both directly and indirectly through the needs. In study 2, conscientious goals were more likely to satisfy, and avoid frustrating, competence needs compared to social goals. We discuss the results considering whole trait and self-determination theory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 113138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188692500100X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to whole trait theory (WTT; Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2021), personality traits serve as a mechanism to fulfill goals, including satisfying basic psychological needs. Conscientiousness may be especially suited for satisfying such needs as it involves task and goal-directed behavior. Given that conscientiousness also includes the avoidance of negative behaviors, it may prevent the frustration of needs as well. Across two studies, we examined the usefulness of conscientiousness in predicting both need satisfaction and frustration. In study 1, we examined whether conscientiousness naturally predicts need satisfaction and need frustration at work, as well as workplace performance. In study 2, we assigned participants a task or a connection goal to determine if these goals would activate the associated personality traits and whether these traits would then increase the chances of satisfying specific psychological needs. Across both studies, conscientiousness was associated with increased need satisfaction and decreased need frustration. In study 1, conscientiousness was also associated with better workplace performance, both directly and indirectly through the needs. In study 2, conscientious goals were more likely to satisfy, and avoid frustrating, competence needs compared to social goals. We discuss the results considering whole trait and self-determination theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尽责性在满足心理需求中的作用:全特质理论视角
根据全特质理论(WTT;弗利森,Jayawickreme, 2021),人格特质是实现目标的机制,包括满足基本的心理需求。尽责性可能特别适合于满足这样的需求,因为它涉及到任务和目标导向的行为。考虑到责任心还包括避免消极行为,它也可能防止需求受挫。在两项研究中,我们检验了尽责性在预测需求满足和挫折方面的有用性。在研究1中,我们考察了尽责性是否自然地预测了工作中的需求满足和需求挫折,以及工作场所绩效。在研究2中,我们给参与者分配了一个任务或一个连接目标,以确定这些目标是否会激活相关的人格特质,以及这些特质是否会增加满足特定心理需求的机会。在这两项研究中,尽责性与需求满意度的增加和需求挫败感的减少有关。在研究1中,尽责性还通过需求直接或间接地与更好的工作场所绩效相关。在研究2中,与社会目标相比,良心目标更有可能满足并避免令人沮丧的能力需求。我们考虑了整体特质和自我决定理论来讨论结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Charisma is not just for the bold: Connecting tripartite narcissism and self-reports of charisma aspects Social support and prosocial decisions in times of distress: Helping a single recipient versus multiple recipients Development and validation of the individual and social music listening scale (ISMUS-LI) Proportionality as a predictor of utilitarian sacrifices: Evidence from the Polish MFQ-2 Sensing a rift in reality: Validation of the self-world existential isolation scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1