Development and validation of the Future Simulation Scale (FSS): A comprehensive measure of beneficially imagining future outcomes

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113135
Elena Fischer , Markus Quirin , Anton-Rupert Laireiter
{"title":"Development and validation of the Future Simulation Scale (FSS): A comprehensive measure of beneficially imagining future outcomes","authors":"Elena Fischer ,&nbsp;Markus Quirin ,&nbsp;Anton-Rupert Laireiter","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the nuanced components of imagining personal future outcomes is essential for grasping the connections between such cognitive processes and well-being. Despite the existence of future thinking scales, a comprehensive measure capturing the crucial elements of future simulation has been lacking. In two studies, we introduced and validated the Future Simulation Scale (FSS). Employing exploratory factor analyses (Study 1, <em>N</em> = 464) and confirmatory factor analyses (Study 2, <em>N</em> = 724), we identified five factors comprising a total of 31 items: Detailed Imaginations, Positive Expectations, Future Self, Future Social Environment, and Fleeting Imaginations. The FSS exhibited robust reliability and demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity by correlating with existing future thinking measures, as well as measures encompassing well-being, ill-being, and personality traits. Notably, the FSS demonstrated incremental validity, predicting unique variance in transdiagnostic variables beyond other established future thinking scales. The FSS provides a valuable tool for exploring future simulation. While the scale was validated in German, future studies should extend its validation to other languages to enhance its cross-cultural applicability and generalizability. Furthermore, an important future task is to address the lack of criterion validity in terms of correlating our scale with an objective or behavioral measure of future-oriented thinking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 113135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the nuanced components of imagining personal future outcomes is essential for grasping the connections between such cognitive processes and well-being. Despite the existence of future thinking scales, a comprehensive measure capturing the crucial elements of future simulation has been lacking. In two studies, we introduced and validated the Future Simulation Scale (FSS). Employing exploratory factor analyses (Study 1, N = 464) and confirmatory factor analyses (Study 2, N = 724), we identified five factors comprising a total of 31 items: Detailed Imaginations, Positive Expectations, Future Self, Future Social Environment, and Fleeting Imaginations. The FSS exhibited robust reliability and demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity by correlating with existing future thinking measures, as well as measures encompassing well-being, ill-being, and personality traits. Notably, the FSS demonstrated incremental validity, predicting unique variance in transdiagnostic variables beyond other established future thinking scales. The FSS provides a valuable tool for exploring future simulation. While the scale was validated in German, future studies should extend its validation to other languages to enhance its cross-cultural applicability and generalizability. Furthermore, an important future task is to address the lack of criterion validity in terms of correlating our scale with an objective or behavioral measure of future-oriented thinking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未来模拟量表(FSS)的开发和验证:一种有益想象未来结果的综合措施
理解想象个人未来结果的微妙组成部分,对于掌握这种认知过程与幸福感之间的联系至关重要。尽管存在未来思维量表,但缺乏捕捉未来模拟关键要素的综合措施。在两项研究中,我们引入并验证了未来模拟量表(FSS)。采用探索性因子分析(研究1,N = 464)和验证性因子分析(研究2,N = 724),我们确定了五个因素,共31个项目:详细想象、积极期望、未来自我、未来社会环境和短暂想象。FSS通过与现有的未来思维测量,以及包括幸福感、不幸福感和人格特征在内的测量相关联,显示出稳健的信度和收敛效度和判别效度。值得注意的是,FSS证明了增量有效性,预测了跨诊断变量的独特方差,超出了其他已建立的未来思维量表。FSS为探索未来的仿真提供了一个有价值的工具。虽然量表在德语中得到了验证,但未来的研究应将其验证扩展到其他语言,以增强其跨文化适用性和普遍性。此外,一项重要的未来任务是解决缺乏标准效度的问题,将我们的量表与面向未来的思维的客观或行为测量相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Charisma is not just for the bold: Connecting tripartite narcissism and self-reports of charisma aspects Social support and prosocial decisions in times of distress: Helping a single recipient versus multiple recipients Development and validation of the individual and social music listening scale (ISMUS-LI) Proportionality as a predictor of utilitarian sacrifices: Evidence from the Polish MFQ-2 Sensing a rift in reality: Validation of the self-world existential isolation scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1