Elena Fischer , Markus Quirin , Anton-Rupert Laireiter
{"title":"Development and validation of the Future Simulation Scale (FSS): A comprehensive measure of beneficially imagining future outcomes","authors":"Elena Fischer , Markus Quirin , Anton-Rupert Laireiter","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the nuanced components of imagining personal future outcomes is essential for grasping the connections between such cognitive processes and well-being. Despite the existence of future thinking scales, a comprehensive measure capturing the crucial elements of future simulation has been lacking. In two studies, we introduced and validated the Future Simulation Scale (FSS). Employing exploratory factor analyses (Study 1, <em>N</em> = 464) and confirmatory factor analyses (Study 2, <em>N</em> = 724), we identified five factors comprising a total of 31 items: Detailed Imaginations, Positive Expectations, Future Self, Future Social Environment, and Fleeting Imaginations. The FSS exhibited robust reliability and demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity by correlating with existing future thinking measures, as well as measures encompassing well-being, ill-being, and personality traits. Notably, the FSS demonstrated incremental validity, predicting unique variance in transdiagnostic variables beyond other established future thinking scales. The FSS provides a valuable tool for exploring future simulation. While the scale was validated in German, future studies should extend its validation to other languages to enhance its cross-cultural applicability and generalizability. Furthermore, an important future task is to address the lack of criterion validity in terms of correlating our scale with an objective or behavioral measure of future-oriented thinking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 113135"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding the nuanced components of imagining personal future outcomes is essential for grasping the connections between such cognitive processes and well-being. Despite the existence of future thinking scales, a comprehensive measure capturing the crucial elements of future simulation has been lacking. In two studies, we introduced and validated the Future Simulation Scale (FSS). Employing exploratory factor analyses (Study 1, N = 464) and confirmatory factor analyses (Study 2, N = 724), we identified five factors comprising a total of 31 items: Detailed Imaginations, Positive Expectations, Future Self, Future Social Environment, and Fleeting Imaginations. The FSS exhibited robust reliability and demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity by correlating with existing future thinking measures, as well as measures encompassing well-being, ill-being, and personality traits. Notably, the FSS demonstrated incremental validity, predicting unique variance in transdiagnostic variables beyond other established future thinking scales. The FSS provides a valuable tool for exploring future simulation. While the scale was validated in German, future studies should extend its validation to other languages to enhance its cross-cultural applicability and generalizability. Furthermore, an important future task is to address the lack of criterion validity in terms of correlating our scale with an objective or behavioral measure of future-oriented thinking.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.