The impact of affective and cognitive empathy on stress in medical students.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1186/s41155-024-00336-9
Madson Alan Maximiano-Barreto, Julia Leles Bueno, Mariana Leles Bueno, Victor Oliveira Wercelens, Julia Guimarães Mauad Ydy, Roberta Perfeito Abrahim, Jed Montayre, Késia Maria Maximiano de Melo
{"title":"The impact of affective and cognitive empathy on stress in medical students.","authors":"Madson Alan Maximiano-Barreto, Julia Leles Bueno, Mariana Leles Bueno, Victor Oliveira Wercelens, Julia Guimarães Mauad Ydy, Roberta Perfeito Abrahim, Jed Montayre, Késia Maria Maximiano de Melo","doi":"10.1186/s41155-024-00336-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the relationship between empathy and its domains (i.e., affective and cognitive) and stress in medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online cross-sectional study with 543 medical students as respondents divided in three groups: pre-clinical cycle (n = 173), clinical cycle (n = 197), and internship (n = 173). The participants completed the sociodemographic questionnaire, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, and the Perceived stress scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants were mostly female (71.5%) with an average age of 23.54 (± 4.54) years old. Medical students in the clinical cycle, when compared to the ones in their pre-clinical cycle and internship, showed higher stress levels. Pre-clinical students presented higher levels of total empathy and its affective domain. The highest levels of empathy, especially affective empathy, were associated with higher stress levels in all three groups. Regarding cognitive empathy, there was no observed association with stress among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The levels of empathy and its affective domain correlated significantly with the stress indicators among students of different cycles (i.e., pre-clinical, clinical cycle, and internship).</p>","PeriodicalId":46901,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","volume":"38 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-024-00336-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the relationship between empathy and its domains (i.e., affective and cognitive) and stress in medical students.

Methods: An online cross-sectional study with 543 medical students as respondents divided in three groups: pre-clinical cycle (n = 173), clinical cycle (n = 197), and internship (n = 173). The participants completed the sociodemographic questionnaire, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, and the Perceived stress scale.

Results: The participants were mostly female (71.5%) with an average age of 23.54 (± 4.54) years old. Medical students in the clinical cycle, when compared to the ones in their pre-clinical cycle and internship, showed higher stress levels. Pre-clinical students presented higher levels of total empathy and its affective domain. The highest levels of empathy, especially affective empathy, were associated with higher stress levels in all three groups. Regarding cognitive empathy, there was no observed association with stress among the groups.

Conclusions: The levels of empathy and its affective domain correlated significantly with the stress indicators among students of different cycles (i.e., pre-clinical, clinical cycle, and internship).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情感和认知共情对医学生压力的影响。
目的:分析医学生共情及其情感域和认知域与压力的关系。方法:采用在线横断面研究方法,将543名医学生分为临床前期(n = 173)、临床期(n = 197)和实习期(n = 173)。参与者完成了社会人口调查问卷、人际反应指数和感知压力量表。结果:参与者以女性居多(71.5%),平均年龄23.54(±4.54)岁。临床阶段的医学生比临床前期和实习阶段的医学生表现出更高的压力水平。临床前学生表现出较高的共情水平及其情感领域。在所有三组中,最高水平的同理心,尤其是情感同理心,都与较高的压力水平相关。在认知共情方面,各组之间没有观察到与压力的联系。结论:不同阶段(临床前阶段、临床阶段和实习阶段)学生共情及其情感域水平与压力指标显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Psicologia: Reflexão & Crítica is a journal published three times a year by Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia do Desenvolvimento (Psychology Graduate Program) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul). Its objective is to publish original works in the psychology field: articles, short reports on research and reviews as well as to present to the scientific community texts which reflect a significant contribution for the psychology field. The short title of the journal is Psicol. Refl. Crít. It must be used regarding bibliographies, footnotes, as well as bibliographical strips and references.
期刊最新文献
Social support and life-threatening behavior in online psychotherapy patients: a possible "pulling-together effect" during COVID-19. Men's social representations of the body across age groups. Intercultural Scale on Conceptions of Disability: a cross-cultural validation. Impact of artificial intelligence-generated self-images on children's body image development: a cross-sectional study in Mexico. Reassessing Baumrind's framework: a systematic review of cultural adaptations and emerging parenting patterns in diverse societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1