Walking travel satisfaction – A comparison of three European cities

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Urban Mobility Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100109
Katrin Lättman , Janina Welsch , Noriko Otsuka , Anna-Lena van der Vlugt , Jonas De Vos , Edward Prichard
{"title":"Walking travel satisfaction – A comparison of three European cities","authors":"Katrin Lättman ,&nbsp;Janina Welsch ,&nbsp;Noriko Otsuka ,&nbsp;Anna-Lena van der Vlugt ,&nbsp;Jonas De Vos ,&nbsp;Edward Prichard","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined and compared walking satisfaction in three case study cities in Europe: Dortmund, Genoa, and Gothenburg as part of an EU project. By analyzing household survey data, we explored levels and determinants of walking satisfaction within and between the cities, using the Satisfaction with Travel Scale to measure walking satisfaction. The results show that levels of walking satisfaction differ between the cities, both overall and in terms of its sub-dimensions positive activation, deactivation and cognitive evaluation. This implies that different experiences are present when walking in different contexts. We also found that different factors influence walking satisfaction in different contexts. Accessibility and the social setting, in terms of walking in company or not, are important for walking satisfaction in all contexts. On city level, several differences in determinants were detected. These findings point at the importance of contextual settings in evaluations of walking satisfaction. In all three cities, we also found that walking satisfaction was significantly higher for trips which allow more flexibility, such as leisure or recreational walking, than for trips with a set destination. The findings expand the existing body of knowledge about determinants of walking satisfaction in different urban settings and provides vital insights for urban planning and policies determined to foster walking-friendly and satisfactory local urban environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined and compared walking satisfaction in three case study cities in Europe: Dortmund, Genoa, and Gothenburg as part of an EU project. By analyzing household survey data, we explored levels and determinants of walking satisfaction within and between the cities, using the Satisfaction with Travel Scale to measure walking satisfaction. The results show that levels of walking satisfaction differ between the cities, both overall and in terms of its sub-dimensions positive activation, deactivation and cognitive evaluation. This implies that different experiences are present when walking in different contexts. We also found that different factors influence walking satisfaction in different contexts. Accessibility and the social setting, in terms of walking in company or not, are important for walking satisfaction in all contexts. On city level, several differences in determinants were detected. These findings point at the importance of contextual settings in evaluations of walking satisfaction. In all three cities, we also found that walking satisfaction was significantly higher for trips which allow more flexibility, such as leisure or recreational walking, than for trips with a set destination. The findings expand the existing body of knowledge about determinants of walking satisfaction in different urban settings and provides vital insights for urban planning and policies determined to foster walking-friendly and satisfactory local urban environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Walking travel satisfaction – A comparison of three European cities Mapping the Detroit mobility ecosystem: A case study of a regional initiative centered on future mobility solutions Learning through experiments: The case of low-traffic neighborhoods in London Road Transport and Urban Mobility Greenhouse Gas Emissions Factor for Air Pollution Modeling in Burkina Faso A framework for ranking potential cities for implementing emerging urban mobility technologies: A case study for eVTOL aircraft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1