The Social Organization of Quality of Life of Older People in Long-Term Care Facilities: An Institutional Ethnography Approach.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING Global Qualitative Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23333936251324267
Naomi Hlongwane, Lieketseng Ned
{"title":"The Social Organization of Quality of Life of Older People in Long-Term Care Facilities: An Institutional Ethnography Approach.","authors":"Naomi Hlongwane, Lieketseng Ned","doi":"10.1177/23333936251324267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the growing population in South Africa, there is a need for long-term care facilities. Using institutional ethnography, this study investigates the quality of life for older adults in South African long-term care facilities. Twenty key informants and 10 staff members were purposively sampled across 5 long-term care facilities in Gauteng, South Africa, for participation in in-depth interviews and observations. An analysis of institutional texts was conducted, focusing on legislative frameworks and practices. The findings include three analytic threads, namely: (a) Healthcare Access and Physical Well-Being, (b) Institutional Constraints on Meaningful Engagement, and (c) Efficiency Overriding Privacy and Autonomy. A significant gap exists between legislative policies and actual practices, with older adults seeking more autonomy and decision-making involvement. This institutional ethnography, rooted in the perspectives of older residents and care workers, highlights how long-term care facilities are shaped by regulatory frameworks and institutional ideologies. These frameworks often restrict care workers in fully leveraging their intimate knowledge of residents to address individual needs, as their care work interventions are bound to compliance with the textual and accountability demands of the <i>Older Persons Act 13 of</i> 2006.</p>","PeriodicalId":45940,"journal":{"name":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"23333936251324267"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936251324267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the growing population in South Africa, there is a need for long-term care facilities. Using institutional ethnography, this study investigates the quality of life for older adults in South African long-term care facilities. Twenty key informants and 10 staff members were purposively sampled across 5 long-term care facilities in Gauteng, South Africa, for participation in in-depth interviews and observations. An analysis of institutional texts was conducted, focusing on legislative frameworks and practices. The findings include three analytic threads, namely: (a) Healthcare Access and Physical Well-Being, (b) Institutional Constraints on Meaningful Engagement, and (c) Efficiency Overriding Privacy and Autonomy. A significant gap exists between legislative policies and actual practices, with older adults seeking more autonomy and decision-making involvement. This institutional ethnography, rooted in the perspectives of older residents and care workers, highlights how long-term care facilities are shaped by regulatory frameworks and institutional ideologies. These frameworks often restrict care workers in fully leveraging their intimate knowledge of residents to address individual needs, as their care work interventions are bound to compliance with the textual and accountability demands of the Older Persons Act 13 of 2006.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Qualitative Nursing Research (GQNR) is a ground breaking, international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on qualitative research in fields relevant to nursing and other health professionals world-wide. The journal specializes in topics related to nursing practice, responses to health and illness, health promotion, and health care delivery. GQNR will publish research articles using qualitative methods and qualitatively-driven mixed-method designs as well as meta-syntheses and articles focused on methodological development. Special sections include Ethics, Methodological Development, Advancing Theory/Metasynthesis, Establishing Evidence, and Application to Practice.
期刊最新文献
The Social Organization of Quality of Life of Older People in Long-Term Care Facilities: An Institutional Ethnography Approach. "The Whole Culture of Nursing Needs to Change": A Descriptive Phenomenology of Nurses Being Bullied. "Three Sides to Every Story": Living the Patient, Carer and Staff Experience of COVID. Barriers to Utilization of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services among Young People in Nigeria: A Qualitative Exploration Using the Socioecological Model. Polio Survivors' Experiences of Acute Phase Care After the Isolation Phase in the 1950s and 1960s in Finland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1