{"title":"Explainable machine learning models enhance prediction of PFAS bioactivity using quantitative molecular surface analysis-derived representation","authors":"Zhipeng Yin , Min Zhang , Runzeng Liu , Yong Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The extensive use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in industrial and consumer products poses health risks due to their toxicity. Computational toxicology approaches, particularly quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models are essential for predicting PFAS bioactivity. However, established QSAR models including machine learning-based ones with traditional molecular descriptors such as constitutional, topological, and geometric descriptors, have limited predictive capability and interpretability. Herein, we proposed a novel machine learning approach that leverages quantitative molecular surface analysis (QMSA) of molecular electrostatic potential. Using QMSA descriptors, five machine learning models (e.g., random forest) achieved outstanding performance, with best accuracy of 0.950 ± 0.017, AUC-ROC of 0.938 ± 0.012, F1-score of 0.734 ± 0.024, and MCC of 0.684 ± 0.111 for five targets (tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 in the absence/presence of camptothecin, ATXN2 protein, transcription factor SMAD3, and transcription factor NRF2), which outperform previously reported models. SHAP analyses revealed that estimated density, molecular volume, positive surface area, and nonpolar surface area were the most important descriptors. These descriptors were deeply involved in PFAS binding to target proteins via non-covalent interactions as evidenced by molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. Our results demonstrated that QMSA descriptors-based machine learning models are capable of predicting PFAS toxicity with extraordinary performance and interpretability. This study provides a novel machine learning framework for the high-throughput and cost-effective screening of high-risk emerging PFAS in aquatic environments. By identifying the contaminants that should be prioritized for regulation and treatment among the growing number of PFAS, our work aids in water quality monitoring and risk assessment, and guides decision-making in aquatic environmental management. Furthermore, this work enhances our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in PFAS bioactivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"280 ","pages":"Article 123500"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135425004130","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The extensive use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in industrial and consumer products poses health risks due to their toxicity. Computational toxicology approaches, particularly quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models are essential for predicting PFAS bioactivity. However, established QSAR models including machine learning-based ones with traditional molecular descriptors such as constitutional, topological, and geometric descriptors, have limited predictive capability and interpretability. Herein, we proposed a novel machine learning approach that leverages quantitative molecular surface analysis (QMSA) of molecular electrostatic potential. Using QMSA descriptors, five machine learning models (e.g., random forest) achieved outstanding performance, with best accuracy of 0.950 ± 0.017, AUC-ROC of 0.938 ± 0.012, F1-score of 0.734 ± 0.024, and MCC of 0.684 ± 0.111 for five targets (tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 in the absence/presence of camptothecin, ATXN2 protein, transcription factor SMAD3, and transcription factor NRF2), which outperform previously reported models. SHAP analyses revealed that estimated density, molecular volume, positive surface area, and nonpolar surface area were the most important descriptors. These descriptors were deeply involved in PFAS binding to target proteins via non-covalent interactions as evidenced by molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. Our results demonstrated that QMSA descriptors-based machine learning models are capable of predicting PFAS toxicity with extraordinary performance and interpretability. This study provides a novel machine learning framework for the high-throughput and cost-effective screening of high-risk emerging PFAS in aquatic environments. By identifying the contaminants that should be prioritized for regulation and treatment among the growing number of PFAS, our work aids in water quality monitoring and risk assessment, and guides decision-making in aquatic environmental management. Furthermore, this work enhances our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in PFAS bioactivity.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.