A glimmer of hope: Pro-environmental behavior increases positive emotions after confrontation with environmental threat

IF 6.1 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Environmental Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102575
Peter Zeier , Florian Lange , Zarah Rowland , Michèle Wessa , Mario Wenzel
{"title":"A glimmer of hope: Pro-environmental behavior increases positive emotions after confrontation with environmental threat","authors":"Peter Zeier ,&nbsp;Florian Lange ,&nbsp;Zarah Rowland ,&nbsp;Michèle Wessa ,&nbsp;Mario Wenzel","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>When confronted with ecological crises, people may experience a variety of emotions ranging, e.g., from fear to anger and guilt. The increasing prevalence of <em>eco-emotions</em> raises the question of how to manage these emotional states. Although individuals can choose from a variety of emotion regulation strategies, some strategies have been found to thwart pro-environmental behavior. In a series of experimental studies, we examined the emotion regulation potential of pro-environmental behavior itself. Participants in exploratory Studies 1a and 1b were presented a text about the loss of biodiversity and then decided how much time to spend on an effort task that yields donations to an environmental organization. More pro-environmental behavior was associated with an increase in hope and a decrease in fear in both studies and a decrease in guilt in Study 1b. However, more pro-environmental behavior was confounded with a greater time interval between emotional ratings. In preregistered Study 2, we controlled for possible cool-down effects by having participants complete a time-limited task that would either yield donations to an environmental organization or have no pro-environmental consequences after reading the biodiversity text. Similar to Studies 1a and 1b, participants in the pro-environmental behavior group compared to the control group reported a stronger increase in hope. However, both groups reported a similar decrease in fear and guilt. Consistent with previous research, pro-environmental behavior seems especially effective in upregulating positive emotions. Drawing hope from pro-environmental behavior while maintaining a certain level of concern and responsibility is discussed as an adaptive emotional response to environmental threat.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102575"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425000581","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When confronted with ecological crises, people may experience a variety of emotions ranging, e.g., from fear to anger and guilt. The increasing prevalence of eco-emotions raises the question of how to manage these emotional states. Although individuals can choose from a variety of emotion regulation strategies, some strategies have been found to thwart pro-environmental behavior. In a series of experimental studies, we examined the emotion regulation potential of pro-environmental behavior itself. Participants in exploratory Studies 1a and 1b were presented a text about the loss of biodiversity and then decided how much time to spend on an effort task that yields donations to an environmental organization. More pro-environmental behavior was associated with an increase in hope and a decrease in fear in both studies and a decrease in guilt in Study 1b. However, more pro-environmental behavior was confounded with a greater time interval between emotional ratings. In preregistered Study 2, we controlled for possible cool-down effects by having participants complete a time-limited task that would either yield donations to an environmental organization or have no pro-environmental consequences after reading the biodiversity text. Similar to Studies 1a and 1b, participants in the pro-environmental behavior group compared to the control group reported a stronger increase in hope. However, both groups reported a similar decrease in fear and guilt. Consistent with previous research, pro-environmental behavior seems especially effective in upregulating positive emotions. Drawing hope from pro-environmental behavior while maintaining a certain level of concern and responsibility is discussed as an adaptive emotional response to environmental threat.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
期刊最新文献
Sacrificing for the environment: The role of nonzero-sum beliefs A glimmer of hope: Pro-environmental behavior increases positive emotions after confrontation with environmental threat No waste like home: How the good provider identity drives excessive purchasing and household food waste A new brief scale for social pro-environmental behaviors in adolescents by applying item response theory: The S-PEBS-A Green visuals, greener actions: Increasing recycling behavior through nature imagery and the recycling logo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1