Cochlear health in a cohort of cochlear implant users carrying the p.Pro51Ser variant in the COCH gene (DFNA9): A cross-sectional study evaluating the changes in the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP)

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Research Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2025.109240
Julie Moyaert , Annick Gilles , Dyan Ramekers , Griet Mertens , Erik Fransen , Emilie Cardon , Lana Biot , Eline Verhelst , Vincent Van Rompaey , Marc JW Lammers
{"title":"Cochlear health in a cohort of cochlear implant users carrying the p.Pro51Ser variant in the COCH gene (DFNA9): A cross-sectional study evaluating the changes in the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP)","authors":"Julie Moyaert ,&nbsp;Annick Gilles ,&nbsp;Dyan Ramekers ,&nbsp;Griet Mertens ,&nbsp;Erik Fransen ,&nbsp;Emilie Cardon ,&nbsp;Lana Biot ,&nbsp;Eline Verhelst ,&nbsp;Vincent Van Rompaey ,&nbsp;Marc JW Lammers","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study focuses on DFNA9, an autosomal dominant disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the <em>COCH</em> gene. These mutations induce the formation of aggregates that are toxic to the fibrocytes in the extracellular matrix, ultimately leading to degeneration of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs), which are crucial for transmitting auditory signals from the cochlea to the brain. An important tool for evaluating the function of the SGNs, which are the target cells of a cochlear implant (CI), is the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP). Therefore, the main objective is to evaluate the eCAP to describe the function of the SGNs and study cochlear health in CI patients with DFNA9.</div><div>For this reason, we included 15 carriers of the p.Pro51Ser variant in the <em>COCH</em> gene who received a MED-EL CI (DFNA9 group) and 15 matched control CI subjects without DFNA9 to compare the impedances and subsequently the threshold, amplitude and slope of the eCAP amplitude growth function (AGF). These parameters were evaluated from intraoperative autoART recordings (MED-EL) during CI surgery. Matching of the two groups was based on sex, age at implantation, duration of deafness, and type of implant. The first results, regarding the difference in impedance between DFNA9 and non-DFNA9 patients, show a significant interaction between time and group in the middle and basal electrodes, indicating that electrode impedances were similar in the early phase after implantation between the two groups, but increased significantly more for the DFNA9 group up to one year after implantation. Secondly, the results show that the success rate (present or absent) to record eCAP responses is lower in the DNFA9 group: eCAPs were detectable in 75.5 % of the intraoperative measurements (145/192) in comparison to 96.9 % (186/192) in the group without DFNA9. ECAP absence in the DFNA9 group was observed across the whole electrode array, but more pronounced in the basal region (channels 11 and 12). Additionally, comparing the parameters of the AGF, the maximum eCAP amplitude was consistently smaller and the AGF slope consistently shallower for the DFNA9 group compared to the control group throughout the entirety of the electrode array. Finally, the eCAP thresholds in patients with DFNA9 were higher compared to those in the control patients for all cochlear locations. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the eCAP measurements in patients with DFNA9. As proven in the literature, eCAP measures correlate well with the health and survival of SGC. This means that the results of our study predominantly suggest that DFNA9 leads to an even stronger reduction in excitability and neuronal health than seen in other causes of deafness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"460 ","pages":"Article 109240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525000590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study focuses on DFNA9, an autosomal dominant disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the COCH gene. These mutations induce the formation of aggregates that are toxic to the fibrocytes in the extracellular matrix, ultimately leading to degeneration of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs), which are crucial for transmitting auditory signals from the cochlea to the brain. An important tool for evaluating the function of the SGNs, which are the target cells of a cochlear implant (CI), is the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP). Therefore, the main objective is to evaluate the eCAP to describe the function of the SGNs and study cochlear health in CI patients with DFNA9.
For this reason, we included 15 carriers of the p.Pro51Ser variant in the COCH gene who received a MED-EL CI (DFNA9 group) and 15 matched control CI subjects without DFNA9 to compare the impedances and subsequently the threshold, amplitude and slope of the eCAP amplitude growth function (AGF). These parameters were evaluated from intraoperative autoART recordings (MED-EL) during CI surgery. Matching of the two groups was based on sex, age at implantation, duration of deafness, and type of implant. The first results, regarding the difference in impedance between DFNA9 and non-DFNA9 patients, show a significant interaction between time and group in the middle and basal electrodes, indicating that electrode impedances were similar in the early phase after implantation between the two groups, but increased significantly more for the DFNA9 group up to one year after implantation. Secondly, the results show that the success rate (present or absent) to record eCAP responses is lower in the DNFA9 group: eCAPs were detectable in 75.5 % of the intraoperative measurements (145/192) in comparison to 96.9 % (186/192) in the group without DFNA9. ECAP absence in the DFNA9 group was observed across the whole electrode array, but more pronounced in the basal region (channels 11 and 12). Additionally, comparing the parameters of the AGF, the maximum eCAP amplitude was consistently smaller and the AGF slope consistently shallower for the DFNA9 group compared to the control group throughout the entirety of the electrode array. Finally, the eCAP thresholds in patients with DFNA9 were higher compared to those in the control patients for all cochlear locations. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the eCAP measurements in patients with DFNA9. As proven in the literature, eCAP measures correlate well with the health and survival of SGC. This means that the results of our study predominantly suggest that DFNA9 leads to an even stronger reduction in excitability and neuronal health than seen in other causes of deafness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究的重点是 DFNA9,这是一种由 COCH 基因致病变体引起的常染色体显性遗传疾病。这些变异会诱导形成对细胞外基质中的纤维细胞具有毒性的聚集体,最终导致螺旋神经节神经元(SGNs)变性,而螺旋神经节神经元是将听觉信号从耳蜗传输到大脑的关键。螺旋神经节神经元是人工耳蜗(CI)的靶细胞,评估螺旋神经节神经元功能的一个重要工具是电诱发复合动作电位(eCAP)。因此,我们的主要目的是评估 eCAP 以描述 SGN 的功能,并研究带有 DFNA9 的 CI 患者的耳蜗健康状况。为此,我们纳入了 15 名接受 MED-EL CI 的 COCH 基因 p.Pro51Ser 变异携带者(DFNA9 组)和 15 名不带有 DFNA9 的匹配对照 CI 受试者,以比较阻抗以及 eCAP 振幅增长函数(AGF)的阈值、振幅和斜率。这些参数是在 CI 手术过程中通过术中自动ART 记录(MED-EL)进行评估的。两组患者根据性别、植入年龄、耳聋持续时间和植入类型进行匹配。关于 DFNA9 和非 DFNA9 患者之间阻抗的差异,第一项结果显示,在中间电极和基底电极上,时间与组别之间存在显著的交互作用,表明两组患者在植入后早期的电极阻抗相似,但在植入后一年内,DFNA9 组患者的电极阻抗明显增加。其次,结果显示 DNFA9 组记录 eCAP 反应(存在或不存在)的成功率较低:术中测量的 75.5%(145/192)可检测到 eCAP,而未植入 DFNA9 的组为 96.9%(186/192)。在 DFNA9 组中,整个电极阵列都没有发现 ECAP,但在基底区域(通道 11 和 12)更为明显。此外,在整个电极阵列中,与对照组相比,比较 AGF 的参数,DFNA9 组的最大 eCAP 振幅始终较小,AGF 斜率始终较浅。最后,在所有耳蜗位置,DFNA9 患者的 eCAP 阈值均高于对照组患者。据我们所知,这是第一项调查 DFNA9 患者 eCAP 测量值的研究。文献证明,eCAP 测量结果与 SGC 的健康和存活率密切相关。这意味着,我们的研究结果主要表明,与其他耳聋病因相比,DFNA9 导致的兴奋性和神经元健康下降更为严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Research
Hearing Research 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
163
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles. Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between auditory brainstem responses, cognitive ability, and speech-in-noise perception among young adults with normal hearing thresholds Cochlear health in a cohort of cochlear implant users carrying the p.Pro51Ser variant in the COCH gene (DFNA9): A cross-sectional study evaluating the changes in the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) Tinnitus, masked speech perception, and auditory event-related potentials in clinically normal-hearing adults Evaluating the role of age on speech-in-noise perception based primarily on temporal envelope information Influence of visual analogue of speech envelope, formants, and word onsets on word recognition is not pronounced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1