Clinical Significance of Coronary Flow Reserve Improvement After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31500
Yoshihiro Hanyu, Masahiro Hoshino, Eisuke Usui, Tomoyo Sugiyama, Yoshihisa Kanaji, Masahiro Hada, Tatsuhiro Nagamine, Kai Nogami, Hiroki Ueno, Taishi Yonetsu, Tetsuo Sasano, Tsunekazu Kakuta
{"title":"Clinical Significance of Coronary Flow Reserve Improvement After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention","authors":"Yoshihiro Hanyu,&nbsp;Masahiro Hoshino,&nbsp;Eisuke Usui,&nbsp;Tomoyo Sugiyama,&nbsp;Yoshihisa Kanaji,&nbsp;Masahiro Hada,&nbsp;Tatsuhiro Nagamine,&nbsp;Kai Nogami,&nbsp;Hiroki Ueno,&nbsp;Taishi Yonetsu,&nbsp;Tetsuo Sasano,&nbsp;Tsunekazu Kakuta","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Limited research has explored the prognostic significance of changes in coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), as measured by stress-transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (S-TDE), following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to assess whether post-PCI changes in CFVR are associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and to identify baseline clinical factors that predict improvement of CFVR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis was performed on 184 patients who underwent elective FFR-guided PCI for the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. Standard pre-PCI TDE examinations and pre- and post-PCI physiological assessments using S-TDE were performed. Patients were categorized based on CFVR improvement, defined as an increase greater than the median value of CFVR changes. MACE, including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and heart failure requiring hospitalization, was evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median improvement in CFVR was 0.50 (28.8%). During a median follow-up period of 1.9 years, MACE occurred in 26 patients (14.1%). Patients without CFVR improvement had significantly worse outcomes (<i>p</i> = 0.029). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, both lower pre-PCI CFVR and lack of CFVR improvement were associated with poor prognosis. A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified absence of diabetes, lower pre-PCI FFR, lower pre-PCI CFVR, and longer pre-PCI deceleration time of diastolic coronary flow as predictors of CFVR increase, with an AUC of 0.814 (95% CI: 0.755–0.873).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In patients undergoing elective FFR-guided LAD PCI, a lower pre-PCI CFVR and lack of CFVR improvement were associated with poor prognosis, whereas a comprehensive pre-PCI evaluation predicted CFVR improvement.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"105 7","pages":"1552-1562"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Limited research has explored the prognostic significance of changes in coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), as measured by stress-transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (S-TDE), following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to assess whether post-PCI changes in CFVR are associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and to identify baseline clinical factors that predict improvement of CFVR.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 184 patients who underwent elective FFR-guided PCI for the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. Standard pre-PCI TDE examinations and pre- and post-PCI physiological assessments using S-TDE were performed. Patients were categorized based on CFVR improvement, defined as an increase greater than the median value of CFVR changes. MACE, including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and heart failure requiring hospitalization, was evaluated.

Results

The median improvement in CFVR was 0.50 (28.8%). During a median follow-up period of 1.9 years, MACE occurred in 26 patients (14.1%). Patients without CFVR improvement had significantly worse outcomes (p = 0.029). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, both lower pre-PCI CFVR and lack of CFVR improvement were associated with poor prognosis. A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified absence of diabetes, lower pre-PCI FFR, lower pre-PCI CFVR, and longer pre-PCI deceleration time of diastolic coronary flow as predictors of CFVR increase, with an AUC of 0.814 (95% CI: 0.755–0.873).

Conclusions

In patients undergoing elective FFR-guided LAD PCI, a lower pre-PCI CFVR and lack of CFVR improvement were associated with poor prognosis, whereas a comprehensive pre-PCI evaluation predicted CFVR improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后冠脉血流储备改善的临床意义。
背景:有限的研究探讨了选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后冠状动脉血流速度储备(CFVR)变化的预后意义,CFVR是通过应力-经胸多普勒超声心动图(S-TDE)测量的。本研究旨在评估pci后CFVR的改变是否与主要不良心脏事件(MACE)相关,并确定预测CFVR改善的基线临床因素。方法:对184例选择性ffr引导下行左前降支PCI的患者进行回顾性分析。采用标准的pci前TDE检查和S-TDE进行pci前和pci后的生理评估。根据CFVR改善对患者进行分类,定义为CFVR变化的增加大于中位数。评估MACE,包括全因死亡、心肌梗死、缺血性中风和需要住院治疗的心力衰竭。结果:CFVR的中位改善为0.50(28.8%)。在中位随访1.9年期间,26例(14.1%)患者发生MACE。无CFVR改善的患者预后明显较差(p = 0.029)。在多变量Cox回归分析中,pci前CFVR较低和CFVR改善不足与预后不良相关。多因素logistic回归分析发现,无糖尿病、pci前FFR较低、pci前CFVR较低、pci前舒张期冠状动脉血流减速时间较长是CFVR增加的预测因子,AUC为0.814 (95% CI: 0.755-0.873)。结论:在接受选择性ffr引导的LAD PCI的患者中,较低的PCI前CFVR和缺乏CFVR改善与预后不良相关,而全面的PCI前评估可预测CFVR改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Contemporary and Emerging Therapies in the Management of Refractory Angina: A Clinical Review Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Management of Coronary Artery Disease and Aortic Stenosis Bench Testing Analysis of Perforation Management in the Setting of Bifurcation Coronary Intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1